World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Business and Management
Netherlands
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 82 142 132 4 3 239 51115

Peter C. Verhoef publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter C. Verhoef between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter C. Verhoef published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2021. 6 of the 260 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2021. 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
1997 2025

260 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter C. Verhoef: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 3
1998 0
1999 1
2000 4
2001 8
2002 18
2003 11
2004 9
2005 10
2006 4
2007 11
2008 12
2009 12
2010 13
2011 14
2012 14
2013 7
2014 10
2015 11
2016 16
2017 14
2018 9
2019 7
2020 5
2021 23
2022 3
2023 5
2024 4
2025 2
Total 260
Download as CSV

Peter C. Verhoef publications per year - data summary

  • Peter C. Verhoef, a Business and Management scholar from University of Groningen, has 260 publications recorded across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1997 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 23 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1999, with 1 publication.
  • 1 of the 29 years in the span carries no publications at all (1998).
  • The rate of publication averages 9.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.3 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 37 publications, 14% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1997-2006: 68 publications (6.8 per year); 2007-2016: 120 publications (12.0 per year); 2017-2025: 72 publications (8.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Peter C. Verhoef publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Verhoef sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 235–239 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 239 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28 239
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter C. Verhoef publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • Peter C. Verhoef, a Business and Management scholar from University of Groningen, records 239 publications - the 84th percentile of the discipline.
  • 84% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Peter C. Verhoef, and about 16% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and Peter C. Verhoef ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Peter C. Verhoef D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Verhoef sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7 82
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Peter C. Verhoef D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • Peter C. Verhoef, a Business and Management scholar from University of Groningen, records 82 D-Index - the 95th percentile of the discipline.
  • 95% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Peter C. Verhoef, and about 5% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Peter C. Verhoef ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Business and Management in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Business and Management in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Business and Management in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Business and Management in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Business and Management in Netherlands Leader Award
  • Fellow of the European Marketing Academy (EMAC)
  • Fellow of the European Marketing Academy (EMAC)
  • Fellow of the European Marketing Academy (EMAC)
  • Fellow of the European Marketing Academy (EMAC)
  • Fellow of the European Marketing Academy (EMAC)

Overview

Peter C. Verhoef is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands and specializes in Business, Management, and Accounting, with a primary focus on Marketing. Their scholarly output includes 38 publications in these fields, with significant contributions to several subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law.

Their recent research covers a variety of topics within consumer behavior and digital marketing. Key areas of focus include Consumer Retail Behavior Studies, Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing, Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification, Digital Platforms and Economics, Privacy, Security, and Data Protection, Digital Marketing and Social Media, and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty.

Notable recent publications by Peter C. Verhoef include:

  • Omni-channel retailing: some reflections, 2021, Journal of Strategic Marketing
  • Reflections and predictions on effects of COVID-19 pandemic on retailing, 2022, Journal of service management

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Peter C. Verhoef are:

  • Felix Eggers
  • Jaap E. Wieringa
  • John Qi Dong
  • Frank T. Beke
  • Laurens Sloot

Peter C. Verhoef publishes regularly in several academic journals. The main publication venues include:

  • International Journal of Research in Marketing
  • Journal of Interactive Marketing
  • Journal of Strategic Marketing
  • Journal of service management
  • Journal of Business Research

In addition to journal articles, they have contributed to academic literature through book publications. One known title is "Creating Value with Data Analytics in Marketing: Mastering Data Science," published by the University of Groningen in 2022.

Their research achievements have been recognized by awards such as being named a Fellow of the European Marketing Academy (EMAC).

Best Publications

  • Understanding Customer Experience Throughout the Customer Journey

    Katherine N. Lemon;Pieter C. Verhoef

  • Customer engagement behavior : Theoretical foundations and research directions

    Jenny van Doorn;Katherine N. Lemon;Vikas Mittal;Stephan Nass

  • Customer Experience Creation: Determinants, Dynamics and Management Strategies

    Peter C. Verhoef;Katherine N. Lemon;A. Parasuraman;Anne Roggeveen

  • Digital Transformation: A Multidisciplinary Reflection and Research Agenda

    Peter C. Verhoef;Thijs Broekhuizen;Yakov Bart;Abhi Bhattacharya

  • From Multi-Channel Retailing to Omni-Channel Retailing: Introduction to the Special Issue on Multi-Channel Retailing

    Peter C. Verhoef;P.K. Kannan;J. Jeffrey Inman

  • Understanding the Effect of Customer Relationship Management Efforts on Customer Retention and Customer Share Development

    Peter C. Verhoef

  • Challenges and opportunities in multichannel customer management

    Scott A. Neslin;Dhruv Grewal;Robert Leghorn;Venkatesh Shankar

  • Customer Engagement as a New Perspective in Customer Management

    Peter C. Verhoef;Werner J. Reinartz;Manfred Krafft

  • Multichannel customer management: Understanding the research-shopper phenomenon

    Peter C. Verhoef;Scott A. Neslin;Björn Vroomen

  • The Theoretical Underpinnings of Customer Asset Management: A Framework and Propositions for Future Research

    Ruth N. Bolton;Katherine N. Lemon;Peter C. Verhoef

  • The effect of relational constructs on customer referrals and number of services purchased from a multiservice provider: Does age of relationship matter

    Peter C. Verhoef;Philip Hans Franses;Janny C. Hoekstra

  • The Theoretical Underpinnings of Customer Asset Management: A Framework and Propositions for Future Research

    Ruth N. Bolton;Katherine N. Lemo;Peter C. Verhoef;Katherine N. Lemon

  • Challenges and solutions for marketing in a digital era

    Peter S.H. Leeflang;Peter S.H. Leeflang;Peter C. Verhoef;Peter Dahlström;Tjark Freundt

  • Multichannel Shopper Segments and Their Covariates

    Umut Konus;Peter C. Verhoef;Scott A. Neslin

  • Understanding the Marketing Department's Influence Within the Firm

    Peter C. Verhoef;Peter S. H. Leeflang

  • Willingness to pay for organic products: Differences between virtue and vice foods

    Jenny van Doorn;Peter C. Verhoef

  • Possible determinants of consumers’ adoption of electronic grocery shopping in the Netherlands

    Peter C Verhoef;Fred Langerak

  • Predicting customer potential value an application in the insurance industry

    Peter C. Verhoef;Bas Donkers

  • The impact of satisfaction and payment equity on cross-buying: A dynamic model for a multi-service provider

    Peter C. Verhoef;Philip Hans Franses;Janny C. Hoekstra

  • Customer Engagement Behavior: Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions

    Jenny van Doorn;Katherine N. Lemon;Vikas Mittal;Doreen Pick

  • Driving Customer Equity, How Customer Lifetime Value is Reshaping Corporate Strategy

    Peter C Verhoef;Harry Commandeur

  • The effect of relational constructs on customer referrals and number of services purchases from a multi-service provider: Does age of a relationship matter?

    Philip Hans Franses;Peter Verhoef;Janny Hoekstra

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip Hans Franses
Philip Hans Franses Erasmus University Rotterdam
Tammo H. A. Bijmolt
Tammo H. A. Bijmolt University of Groningen
Peter S.H. Leeflang
Peter S.H. Leeflang University of Groningen
Fred Langerak
Fred Langerak Eindhoven University of Technology
Scott A. Neslin
Scott A. Neslin Dartmouth College
Katherine N. Lemon
Katherine N. Lemon Boston College
Manfred Krafft
Manfred Krafft University of Münster
P. K. Kannan
P. K. Kannan University of Maryland, College Park
Ruth N. Bolton
Ruth N. Bolton Arizona State University
Joost M.E. Pennings
Joost M.E. Pennings Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in business and management unlocks a variety of career paths. Many students opt for specialized programs such as an online construction management accelerated program to quickly enter high-demand fields.

For those seeking leadership roles, earning a doctorate in leadership can pave the way for executive and consulting opportunities. Health professionals may consider an accelerated healthcare administration degree online to qualify for management positions in a growing sector.

With so many options available, choosing one of the best online universities is crucial. Accredited institutions offer flexible, high-quality programs while supporting career advancement. Whether advancing your current career or pivoting to a new industry, these online degrees provide diverse opportunities tailored to your interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Peter C. Verhoef

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles