World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
Argentina
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 54 1728 1586 7 7 131 9306

Daniel J. Miralles publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel J. Miralles between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel J. Miralles published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2023. 18 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2023. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 7 publications
1992 2025

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel J. Miralles: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 2
1997 2
1998 2
1999 0
2000 2
2001 2
2002 1
2003 5
2004 1
2005 3
2006 3
2007 8
2008 7
2009 3
2010 3
2011 7
2012 4
2013 5
2014 11
2015 8
2016 5
2017 6
2018 6
2019 8
2020 4
2021 12
2022 6
2023 15
2024 11
2025 7
Total 164
Download as CSV

Daniel J. Miralles publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Miralles sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–135 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 131 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201 131
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Daniel J. Miralles D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Miralles sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98 54
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Argentina Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Argentina Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Agronomy
  • Botany
  • Horticulture

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Agronomy, Anthesis, photoperiodism, Cultivar and Horticulture. Daniel J. Miralles integrates Agronomy and Shading in his studies. His Anthesis research incorporates themes from Primordium, Poaceae and Plant physiology.

In his study, Field experiment is inextricably linked to Dry weight, which falls within the broad field of photoperiodism. His work is dedicated to discovering how Cultivar, Vernalization are connected with Phyllochron, Environmental factor, High yielding and Main stem and other disciplines. As a part of the same scientific study, Daniel J. Miralles usually deals with the Sowing, concentrating on Dwarfing and frequently concerns with Biomass and Grain yield.

His most cited work include:

  • PAPER PRESENTED AT INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INCREASING WHEAT YIELD POTENTIAL, CIMMYT, OBREGON, MEXICO, 20–24 MARCH 2006 Sink limitations to yield in wheat: how could it be reduced? (169 citations)
  • Floret development in near isogenic wheat lines differing in plant height (168 citations)
  • Duration of the stem elongation period influences the number of fertile florets in wheat and barley. (162 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Agronomy, Cultivar, Anthesis, Horticulture and Sowing are his primary areas of study. His Agronomy study often links to related topics such as photoperiodism. His photoperiodism study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Flor and Stem elongation.

His research investigates the link between Cultivar and topics such as Rapeseed that cross with problems in Brassica. His research integrates issues of Primordium, Dry weight, Poaceae and Field experiment in his study of Anthesis. His studies deal with areas such as Ecophysiology and Plant nutrition as well as Horticulture.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (120.90%)
  • Cultivar (52.24%)
  • Anthesis (43.28%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Agronomy (120.90%)
  • Yield (29.10%)
  • Waterlogging (17.91%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Agronomy, Yield, Waterlogging, Anthesis and Horticulture. In the field of Agronomy, his study on Sowing, Phenology, Crop and Growing season overlaps with subjects such as Yield. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Crop, photoperiodism, Canola and Brassica is strongly linked to Point of delivery.

His research in Yield focuses on subjects like Crop yield, which are connected to Plant physiology and Grain number. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Photosynthesis, Field pea and Aerenchyma. His Anthesis research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Dry weight, High nitrogen, Plant density, Tiller and Animal science.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Waterlogging of Winter Crops at Early and Late Stages: Impacts on Leaf Physiology, Growth and Yield (25 citations)
  • Warm nights in the Argentine Pampas: Modelling its impact on wheat and barley shows yield reductions (12 citations)
  • Physiological traits associated with reductions in grain number in wheat and barley under waterlogging (9 citations)

Best Publications

  • Sulfur fertilization improves nitrogen use efficiency in wheat by increasing nitrogen uptake

    Fernando Salvagiotti;Julio M. Castellarín;Daniel J. Miralles;Hugo M. Pedrol

  • Prospects of doubling global wheat yields

    Malcolm J. Hawkesford;Jose Luis Araus;Robert Park;Daniel Calderini

  • PAPER PRESENTED AT INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INCREASING WHEAT YIELD POTENTIAL, CIMMYT, OBREGON, MEXICO, 20–24 MARCH 2006 Sink limitations to yield in wheat: how could it be reduced?

    D. J. Miralles;Gustavo A. Slafer

  • Floret development in near isogenic wheat lines differing in plant height.

    Daniel J Miralles;Sergio D Katz;Alfredo Colloca;Gustavo A Slafer

  • Duration of the stem elongation period influences the number of fertile florets in wheat and barley.

    Daniel J. Miralles;Richard A. Richards;Gustavo A. Slafer

  • Wheat floret survival as related to pre-anthesis spike growth

    Fernanda Gabriela González;Daniel Julio Miralles;Daniel Julio Miralles;Gustavo Ariel Slafer

  • Radiation interception, biomass production and grain yield as affected by the interaction of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization in wheat

    Fernando Salvagiotti;Daniel J. Miralles

  • Individual grain weight responses to genetic reduction in culm length in wheat as affected by source-sink manipulations

    Daniel J. Miralles;Gustavo A. Slafer

  • Identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley

    Romina P. de San Celedonio;L. Gabriela Abeledo;L. Gabriela Abeledo;Daniel J. Miralles;Daniel J. Miralles

  • Yield, biomass and yield components in dwarf, semi-dwarf and tall isogenic lines of spring wheat under recommended and late sowing dates

    D. J. Miralles;G. A. Slafer

  • Grain and floret number in response to photoperiod during stem elongation in fully and slightly vernalized wheats

    Fernanda G González;Gustavo A Slafer;Daniel J Miralles

  • Responses of Leaf and Tiller Emergence and Primordium Initiation in Wheat and Barley to Interchanged Photoperiod

    D. J. Miralles;R. A. Richards

  • Autophagy regulated by day length determines the number of fertile florets in wheat.

    Hernán O. Ghiglione;Fernanda G. Gonzalez;Román Serrago;Sara B. Maldonado

  • Floret development and spike growth as affected by photoperiod during stem elongation in wheat

    Fernanda G González;Gustavo A Slafer;Daniel J Miralles

  • High night temperatures during grain number determination reduce wheat and barley grain yield: a field study.

    Guillermo Ariel García;M. Fernanda Dreccer;Daniel Julio Miralles;Roman Augusto Serrago

  • Waterlogging of Winter Crops at Early and Late Stages: Impacts on Leaf Physiology, Growth and Yield

    Rocío Antonella Ploschuk;Daniel Julio Miralles;Timothy David Colmer;Edmundo Leonardo Ploschuk

  • Photoperiod Sensitivity during Stem Elongation as an Avenue to Raise Potential Yield in Wheat

    G. A. Slafer;L. G. Abeledo;D. J. Miralles;F. G. Gonzalez

  • Pre-anthesis development and number of fertile florets in wheat as affected by photoperiod sensitivity genes Ppd-D1 and Ppd-B1

    Fernanda G. González;Gustavo A. Slafer;Gustavo A. Slafer;Gustavo A. Slafer;Daniel J. Miralles;Daniel J. Miralles

  • Differences in yield, biomass and their components between triticale and wheat grown under contrasting water and nitrogen environments

    Gaspar Estrada-Campuzano;Gustavo A. Slafer;Daniel J. Miralles;Daniel J. Miralles

  • Fruiting efficiency: an alternative trait to further rise wheat yield

    Gustavo A. Slafer;Mónica Elia;Roxana Savin;Guillermo Ariel García

  • Critical period for grain number establishment of near isogenic lines of two- and six-rowed barley

    Sebastián Arisnabarreta;Daniel J. Miralles;Daniel J. Miralles

  • Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of near-isogenic wheat lines with different height

    Daniel J. Miralles;Gustavo A. Slafer

Frequent Co-Authors

Gustavo A. Slafer
Gustavo A. Slafer University of Lleida
Matthew P. Reynolds
Matthew P. Reynolds International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
M. Fernanda Dreccer
M. Fernanda Dreccer University of Queensland
Roxana Savin
Roxana Savin University of Lleida
Scott C. Chapman
Scott C. Chapman University of Queensland
Richard A. Richards
Richard A. Richards Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Timothy D. Colmer
Timothy D. Colmer University of Western Australia
Victor O. Sadras
Victor O. Sadras Flinders University
John W. Snape
John W. Snape Norwich Research Park
Tong Zhu
Tong Zhu Research Triangle Park Foundation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniel J. Miralles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles