World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
67
Citations
19574
World Ranking
2574
National Ranking
1491

Candice L. Odgers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Candice L. Odgers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 136 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Candice L. Odgers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Candice L. Odgers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Candice L. Odgers is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of digital technology and adolescent development, with an emphasis on mental health and psychosocial outcomes.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Subfields of study encompass:

  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Clinical Psychology
  • General Health Professions
  • Applied Psychology

The key topics addressed in their work involve:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Early Childhood Education and Development

Odgers has contributed to a number of peer-reviewed articles, including:

  • "Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment-21" (2022), published in PsycTESTS Dataset
  • "Annual Research Review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions" (2020), published in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • "Population vs Individual Prediction of Poor Health From Results of Adverse Childhood Experiences Screening" (2021), published in JAMA Pediatrics
  • "Screen Time, Social Media Use, and Adolescent Development" (2020), published in Annual Review of Developmental Psychology
  • "Young Adolescents' Digital Technology Use, Perceived Impairments, and Well-Being in a Representative Sample" (2020), published in The Journal of Pediatrics

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Louise Arseneault
  • Terrie E. Moffitt
  • William Copeland
  • Helen L. Fisher
  • Andrea Danese

Odgers' publications have appeared repeatedly in notable venues such as:

  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Journal of Adolescent Health
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science

Best Publications

  • Group-Based Trajectory Modeling in Clinical Research

    Daniel S. Nagin;Candice L. Odgers

  • Female and male antisocial trajectories: From childhood origins to adult outcomes

    Candice L Odgers;Terrie E Moffitt;Jonathan M Broadbent;Nigel Dickson

  • Annual Research Review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions

    Candice L. Odgers;Michaeline R. Jensen

  • Persistence and Fadeout in the Impacts of Child and Adolescent Interventions

    Drew Bailey;Greg J. Duncan;Candice L. Odgers;Winnie Yu

  • Social isolation, loneliness and depression in young adulthood: a behavioural genetic analysis

    Timothy Matthews;Andrea Danese;Andrea Danese;Jasmin Wertz;Candice Odgers

  • Research Review: DSM-V conduct disorder: research needs for an evidence base

    Terrie E. Moffitt;Terrie E. Moffitt;Louise Arseneault;Sara R. Jaffee;Julia Kim-Cohen;Julia Kim-Cohen

  • Prediction of differential adult health burden by conduct problem subtypes in males.

    Candice L. Odgers;Avshalom Caspi;Jonathan M. Broadbent;Nigel Dickson

  • The epidemiology of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder in a representative cohort of young people in England and Wales

    Stephanie J Lewis;Louise Arseneault;Avshalom Caspi;Avshalom Caspi;Helen L Fisher

  • Conduct disorder

    Unknown

  • Is It Important to Prevent Early Exposure to Drugs and Alcohol Among Adolescents

    Candice L. Odgers;Avshalom Caspi;Daniel S. Nagin;Alex R. Piquero

  • Developmental Trajectories of Legal Socialization Among Serious Adolescent Offenders

    Alex R. Piquero;Jeffrey Fagan;Edward P. Mulvey;Laurence Steinberg

  • Lonely young adults in modern Britain: findings from an epidemiological cohort study.

    Tim Matthews;Andrea Danese;Avshalom Caspi;Helen Fisher

  • Blunted Cortisol Responses to Stress Signal Social and Behavioral Problems Among Maltreated/Bullied 12-Year-Old Children

    Isabelle Ouellet-Morin;Candice L. Odgers;Andrea Danese;Lucy Bowes

  • Systematic social observation of children's neighborhoods using Google Street View: a reliable and cost-effective method

    Candice L. Odgers;Avshalom Caspi;Avshalom Caspi;Christopher J. Bates;Robert J. Sampson

  • Exposure to maternal vs. paternal partner violence, PTSD, and aggression in adolescent girls and boys

    Marlene M. Moretti;Ingrid Obsuth;Candice L. Odgers;Pratibha Reebye

  • Seven fears and the science of how mobile technologies may be influencing adolescents in the digital age

    Madeleine J. George;Candice L. Odgers

  • Etiological and clinical features of childhood psychotic symptoms: results from a birth cohort.

    Guilherme Polanczyk;Terrie E. Moffitt;Louise Arseneault;Mary Cannon

  • Exploration of NO2 and PM2.5 air pollution and mental health problems using high-resolution data in London-based children from a UK longitudinal cohort study

    Susanna Roberts;Louise Arseneault;Benjamin Malyon Barratt;Sean David Beevers

  • The protective effects of neighborhood collective efficacy on British children growing up in deprivation: a developmental analysis.

    Candice L. Odgers;Terrie E. Moffitt;Laura Marie Tach;Robert J. Sampson

  • Aggressive and antisocial girls: Research update and challenges

    Candice L. Odgers;Marlene M. Moretti

  • Supportive parenting mediates neighborhood socioeconomic disparities in children's antisocial behavior from ages 5 to 12

    Candice L. Odgers;Avshalom Caspi;Michael A. Russell;Robert J. Sampson

  • Group-Based Trajectory Modeling (Nearly) Two Decades Later.

    Daniel S. Nagin;Candice L. Odgers

Frequent Co-Authors

Terrie E. Moffitt
Terrie E. Moffitt Duke University
Avshalom Caspi
Avshalom Caspi Duke University
Louise Arseneault
Louise Arseneault King's College London
Andrea Danese
Andrea Danese King's College London
Helen L. Fisher
Helen L. Fisher King's College London
Marlene M. Moretti
Marlene M. Moretti Simon Fraser University
N. Dickon Reppucci
N. Dickon Reppucci University of Virginia
Renate Houts
Renate Houts Duke University
Richie Poulton
Richie Poulton University of Otago
Daniel W. Belsky
Daniel W. Belsky Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens the door to a range of online degrees and diverse career paths. One of the most in-demand roles is that of a substance abuse counselor, an essential position for supporting individuals struggling with addiction. Requirements and pathways can vary by state and city, so it’s important to understand local guidelines and certification processes.

For example, those interested in counseling careers can learn about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Lubbock, or find out about specific steps for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Madison. Each location has distinct education requirements, certification exams, and supervised work experience.

If you’re considering work in Tennessee, reviewing the Memphis substance abuse counselor certification requirements can provide insights into state-specific licensing. Similarly, aspiring professionals should read about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Mesa to familiarize themselves with local regulations.

Online psychology degrees streamline access to these rewarding careers and help students meet the varied requirements across different regions. Thorough research ensures you choose the best path for your professional goals in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Candice L. Odgers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles