World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antoine Geissbuhler

Antoine Geissbuhler

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
8624
World Ranking
7934
National Ranking
149

Antoine Geissbuhler publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antoine Geissbuhler sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 251 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Antoine Geissbuhler D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antoine Geissbuhler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antoine Geissbuhler is affiliated with the University of Geneva in Switzerland. Their research encompasses diverse topics within the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with a focus on subfields such as General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Occupational Therapy, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, as well as Geriatrics and Gerontology.

The scientist has contributed to multiple prominent topics, including Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs, Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes, Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Electronic Health Records Systems, and broader Pharmaceutical studies and practices.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
  • Revue Médicale Suisse
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
  • Haemophilia

Recent papers authored in collaboration with others include:

  • iCHECK-DH: Guidelines and Checklist for the Reporting on Digital Health Implementations, 2023, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • The safe handling of chemotherapy drugs in low- and middle-income countries: An overview of practices, 2021, Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
  • Gamified Physical Rehabilitation for Older Adults With Musculoskeletal Issues: Pilot Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial, 2022, JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
  • Design, development and usability of an educational AI chatbot for People with Haemophilia in Senegal, 2023, Haemophilia
  • Improving Primary Care Medication Processes by Using Shared Electronic Medication Plans in Switzerland: Lessons Learned From a Participatory Action Research Study, 2020, JMIR Formative Research

The scientist collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including Caroline Perrin, Pascal Bonnabry, Awa Babington-Ashaye, Cheick Oumar Bagayoko, and Christian Lovis.

Best Publications

  • A review of content-based image retrieval systems in medical applications—clinical benefits and future directions

    Henning Müller;Nicolas Michoux;David Bandon;Antoine Geissbuhler

  • Learning from imbalanced data in surveillance of nosocomial infection

    Gilles Cohen;Mélanie Hilario;Hugo Sax;Stéphane Hugonnet

  • Building a reference multimedia database for interstitial lung diseases

    Adrien Depeursinge;Alejandro Vargas;Alexandra Platon;Antoine Geissbuhler

  • Erratum to “A review of content-based image retrieval systems in medical applications—Clinical benefits and future directions” [Int. J. Med. Inform. 73 (1) (2004) 1–23]

    Henning Müller;Nicolas Michoux;David Bandon;Antoine Geissbuhler

  • Fully three-dimensional reconstruction for a PET camera with retractable septa

    D.W. Townsend;A. Geissbuhler;M. Defrise;E.J. Hoffman

  • The RAFT network: 5 years of distance continuing medical education and tele-consultations over the Internet in French-speaking Africa.

    Antoine Geissbuhler;Cheick Oumar Bagayoko;Ousmane Ly

  • Computer literacy and E-learning perception in Cameroon: the case of Yaounde Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences

    Georges Wylfred Bediang;Georges Wylfred Bediang;Beat Stoll;Antoine Geissbuhler;Axel Maximo Klohn

  • Three dimensional reconstruction of PET data from a multi-ring camera

    D.W. Townsend;T. Sprinks;T. Jones;A. Geissbuhler

  • A normalization technique for 3D PET data

    M Defrise;D W Townsend;D Bailey;A M C Geissbuhler

  • Impact of CPOE on Mortality Rates – Contradictory Findings, Important Messages

    Elske Ammenwerth;J. Talmon;J. S. Ash;D. W. Bates

  • Clinical data mining: a review.

    J. Iavindrasana;G. Cohen;A. Depeursinge;H. Müller

  • Evolution of health web certification through the HONcode experience.

    Célia Boyer;Vincent Baujard;Antoine Geissbuhler

  • Telemedicine in Western Africa: lessons learned from a pilot project in Mali, perspectives and recommendations.

    Antoine Geissbuhler;Ousmane Ly;Christian Lovis;Jean-François L’Haire

  • Trustworthy reuse of health data: A transnational perspective

    Antoine Geissbuhler;C Safran;I Buchan;R Bellazzi

  • A Rotating PET Scanner Using BGO Block Detectors: Design, Performance and Applications

    David W. Townsend;Martin Wensveen;Larry G. Byars;Antoine Geissbuhler

  • Using argumentation to extract key sentences from biomedical abstracts.

    Patrick Ruch;Celia Boyer;Christine Chichester;Imad Tbahriti;Imad Tbahriti

  • Using lexical disambiguation and named-entity recognition to improve spelling correction in the electronic patient record

    Patrick Ruch;Robert Baud;Antoine Geissbühler

  • Automatic medical encoding with SNOMED categories

    Patrick Ruch;Julien Gobeill;Christian Lovis;Antoine Geissbühler

  • Assessment of Internet-based tele-medicine in Africa (the RAFT project).

    Cheick Oumar Bagayoko;Henning Müller;Antoine Geissbuhler

  • Near-Affine-Invariant Texture Learning for Lung Tissue Analysis Using Isotropic Wavelet Frames

    A. Depeursinge;D. Van de Ville;A. Platon;A. Geissbuhler

Frequent Co-Authors

Henning Müller
Henning Müller University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland
Christian Lovis
Christian Lovis University of Geneva
Patrick Ruch
Patrick Ruch Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Adrien Depeursinge
Adrien Depeursinge University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland
Randolph A. Miller
Randolph A. Miller Vanderbilt University
Michel Defrise
Michel Defrise Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Terry Jones
Terry Jones University of California, Davis
William R. Hersh
William R. Hersh Oregon Health & Science University
Paul Clough
Paul Clough University of Sheffield
Pearl Pu
Pearl Pu École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to many related fields and flexible study options. Students seeking a fast track can consider a 1 year computer science degree online. These accelerated programs are designed for students who want to quickly build industry-ready skills and enter tech careers sooner.

Other STEM-focused pathways are also available. For instance, those interested in tackling environmental challenges may explore environmental engineering schools online. Engineering fans have further options, such as earning an online degree in mechanical engineering, to learn how to design and innovate across industries ranging from automotive to manufacturing.

For students drawn to science and research, a physics degree online can open opportunities in technology, data science, and academia. These online programs offer flexibility and affordability, making advanced education in STEM accessible to a wider range of learners, whether starting a new career or advancing in your current field.

Best Scientists Citing Antoine Geissbuhler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles