World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
40
Citations
13123
World Ranking
7152
National Ranking
109

Patrick Ruch publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Ruch sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 235 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Patrick Ruch D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Ruch sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick Ruch is affiliated with the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics in Switzerland. Their research activity is primarily situated within the broader field of Engineering, focusing especially on Biomedical Engineering. Subfields closely related to their work include Bioengineering, Sensory Systems, Electrochemistry, and Nutrition and Dietetics.

The scientist's research topics reflect a concentration on sensor technologies and analytical methods in chemistry and biology. These include:

  • Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
  • Food Supply Chain Traceability

Patrick Ruch has contributed to several recent papers, collaborating frequently with authors such as Gianmarco Gabrieli, Michał Muszyński, Yuksel Temiz, Ralph Heller, and Kitahiro Kaneda. Their recent publications include:

  • Digital Fingerprinting of Complex Liquids Using a Reconfigurable Multi-Sensor System with Foundation Models, 2024, Advanced Science
  • Activity recognition in scientific experimentation using multimodal visual encoding, 2024, Digital Discovery
  • Accelerated estimation of coffee sensory profiles using an AI-assisted electronic tongue, 2022, Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies
  • Feature importance methods unveiling the cross-sensitive response of an integrated sensor array to quantify major cations in drinking water, 2022, 2022 IEEE Sensors
  • Combining an Integrated Sensor Array with Machine Learning for the Simultaneous Quantification of Multiple Cations in Aqueous Mixtures, 2021, Analytical Chemistry

The scientist's publications appear repeatedly in specific venues such as 2022 IEEE Sensors, Analytical Chemistry, Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, Advanced Science, and Digital Discovery. The most frequent publication venue is 2022 IEEE Sensors, where two papers have been published.

Collaborative efforts are an important aspect of their scientific contributions, with frequent co-authors including Gianmarco Gabrieli, with whom they have coauthored nine papers, as well as Michał Muszyński, Yuksel Temiz, Ralph Heller, and Kitahiro Kaneda.

Best Publications

  • UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021

    Alex Bateman;Maria-Jesus Martin;Sandra Orchard

  • Overview of BioCreative II gene normalization.

    Alexander A. Morgan;Zhiyong Lu;Xinglong Wang;Aaron M. Cohen

  • Aging and failure mode of electrochemical double layer capacitors during accelerated constant load tests

    R. Kötz;P.W. Ruch;D. Cericola

  • DisProt: intrinsic protein disorder annotation in 2020.

    András Hatos;Borbála Hajdu-Soltész;Alexander M Monzon;Nicolas Palopoli

  • Aging of electrochemical double layer capacitors with acetonitrile-based electrolyte at elevated voltages

    P.W. Ruch;D. Cericola;A. Foelske-Schmitz;R. Kötz

  • On the use of activated carbon as a quasi-reference electrode in non-aqueous electrolyte solutions

    Patrick W. Ruch;Dario Cericola;Matthias Hahn;Rüdiger Kötz

  • A comparison of the aging of electrochemical double layer capacitors with acetonitrile and propylene carbonate-based electrolytes at elevated voltages

    P.W. Ruch;D. Cericola;A. Foelske;R. Kötz

  • The gene normalization task in BioCreative III

    Zhiyong Lu;Hung-Yu Kao;Chih-Hsuan Wei;Minlie Huang

  • An in situ Raman study of the intercalation of supercapacitor-type electrolyte into microcrystalline graphite

    Laurence J. Hardwick;Matthias Hahn;Patrick Ruch;Michael Holzapfel

  • Automatic assignment of biomedical categories: toward a generic approach

    Patrick Ruch

  • In situ Raman spectroscopy of insertion electrodes for lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors: First cycle effects

    Laurence J. Hardwick;Patrick W. Ruch;Matthias Hahn;Werner Scheifele

  • The COMBREX Project: Design, Methodology, and Initial Results

    Brian P. Anton;Yi-Chien Chang;Peter Brown;Han-Pil Choi

  • A Dilatometric Study of Lithium Intercalation into Powder-Type Graphite Electrodes

    M. Hahn;H. Buqa;P. W. Ruch;D. Goers

  • Medical document anonymization with a semantic lexicon.

    Patrick Ruch;Robert H. Baud;Anne-Marie Rassinoux;Pierrette Bouillon

  • In situ X-ray diffraction of the intercalation of (C2H5)4N+ and BF4− into graphite from acetonitrile and propylene carbonate based supercapacitor electrolytes

    P.W. Ruch;M. Hahn;F. Rosciano;M. Holzapfel

  • Using argumentation to extract key sentences from biomedical abstracts.

    Patrick Ruch;Celia Boyer;Christine Chichester;Imad Tbahriti;Imad Tbahriti

  • Using lexical disambiguation and named-entity recognition to improve spelling correction in the electronic patient record

    Patrick Ruch;Robert Baud;Antoine Geissbühler

  • Electrochemical characterization of single-walled carbon nanotubes for electrochemical double layer capacitors using non-aqueous electrolyte

    P.W. Ruch;R. Kötz;A. Wokaun

  • Simulation of a supercapacitor/Li-ion battery hybrid for pulsed applications

    Dario Cericola;Patrick W. Ruch;Rüdiger Kötz;Petr Novák

  • Automatic medical encoding with SNOMED categories

    Patrick Ruch;Julien Gobeill;Christian Lovis;Antoine Geissbühler

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Lovis
Christian Lovis University of Geneva
Antoine Geissbuhler
Antoine Geissbuhler University of Geneva
Rüdiger Kötz
Rüdiger Kötz Paul Scherrer Institute
Henning Müller
Henning Müller University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland
Petr Novák
Petr Novák ETH Zurich
Alexander Wokaun
Alexander Wokaun Paul Scherrer Institute
Pascale Gaudet
Pascale Gaudet Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Cecilia N. Arighi
Cecilia N. Arighi University of Delaware
Amos Marc Bairoch
Amos Marc Bairoch Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Chun-Nan Hsu
Chun-Nan Hsu University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Ruch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles