World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
11627
World Ranking
7062
National Ranking
3101

George R. Thoma publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George R. Thoma sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 333 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

George R. Thoma D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George R. Thoma sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - SPIE Fellow

Overview

George R. Thoma is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research spans a range of topics within economics, econometrics, finance, and business management, with a particular focus on innovation policy, intellectual property, and capital investment risk analysis.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance
  • Business, Management and Accounting

Subfields of their research emphasize:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Finance

The primary topics covered in their publications are:

  • Innovation Policy and R&D
  • Intellectual Property and Patents
  • Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
  • Firm Innovation and Growth

George R. Thoma's recent scholarly output includes the following papers:

  • "Composite value index of trademark indicators: A market value analysis using Tobin's Q," 2021, published in World Patent Information
  • "Patents as Real Options: A Sensitivity Analysis of Option Valuation Using the Binomial Model," 2023, published in Quarterly Journal of Finance
  • "A Sensitivity Analysis of the Patent Real Option Valuation Using the Binomial Model," 2021, published in Academy of Management Proceedings
  • "Market valuation of international patenting using a real option approach: the moderating role of uncertainty," 2024, published in Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • World Patent Information
  • Quarterly Journal of Finance
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Economics of Innovation and New Technology

George R. Thoma was recognized as an SPIE Fellow in 1999.

Best Publications

  • Preparing a collection of radiology examinations for distribution and retrieval

    Dina Demner-Fushman;Marc D. Kohli;Marc B. Rosenman;Sonya E. Shooshan

  • Two public chest X-ray datasets for computer-aided screening of pulmonary diseases.

    Stefan Jaeger;Sema Candemir;Sameer Antani;Yì-Xiáng J. Wáng

  • Automatic Tuberculosis Screening Using Chest Radiographs

    Stefan Jaeger;Alexandros Karargyris;Sema Candemir;Les Folio

  • Lung Segmentation in Chest Radiographs Using Anatomical Atlases With Nonrigid Registration

    Sema Candemir;Stefan Jaeger;Kannappan Palaniappan;Jonathan P. Musco

  • Image analysis and machine learning for detecting malaria

    Mahdieh Poostchi;Kamolrat Silamut;Richard J. Maude;Stefan Jaeger

  • Pre-trained convolutional neural networks as feature extractors toward improved malaria parasite detection in thin blood smear images

    Sivaramakrishnan Rajaraman;Sameer K. Antani;Mahdieh Poostchi;Kamolrat Silamut

  • Histology image analysis for carcinoma detection and grading

    Lei He;L. Rodney Long;Sameer Antani;George R. Thoma

  • Automated page orientation and skew angle detection for binary document images

    Daniel S Le;George R Thoma;Harry Wechsler

  • CNN-based image analysis for malaria diagnosis

    Zhaohui Liang;Andrew Powell;Ilker Ersoy;Mahdieh Poostchi

  • Visualization and Interpretation of Convolutional Neural Network Predictions in Detecting Pneumonia in Pediatric Chest Radiographs.

    Sivaramakrishnan Rajaraman;Sema Candemir;Incheol Kim;George Thoma

  • Multimodal Recurrent Model with Attention for Automated Radiology Report Generation

    Yuan Xue;Tao Xu;L. Rodney Long;Zhiyun Xue

  • A Learning-Based Similarity Fusion and Filtering Approach for Biomedical Image Retrieval Using SVM Classification and Relevance Feedback

    M. Rahman;S. Antani;G. Thoma

  • Harmonizing and Combining Large Datasets - An Application to Firm-Level Patent and Accounting Data

    Grid Thoma;Salvatore Torrisi;Alfonso Gambardella;Dominique Guellec

  • Feature Selection for Automatic Tuberculosis Screening in Frontal Chest Radiographs.

    Szilárd Vajda;Alexandros Karargyris;Stefan Jaeger;K.C. Santosh

  • Design and Development of a Multimodal Biomedical Information Retrieval System

    Dina Demner-Fushman;Sameer K. Antani;Matthew S. Simpson;George R. Thoma

  • Detecting tuberculosis in radiographs using combined lung masks

    Stefan Jaeger;Alexandros Karargyris;Sameer Antani;George Thoma

  • Automatic screening for tuberculosis in chest radiographs: a survey.

    Stefan Jaeger;Alexandros Karargyris;Sema Candemir;Jenifer Siegelman

  • Combination of texture and shape features to detect pulmonary abnormalities in digital chest X-rays

    Alexandros Karargyris;Jenifer Siegelman;Jenifer Siegelman;Dimitris Tzortzis;Stefan Jaeger

  • SPIRS: A Web-based Image Retrieval System for Large Biomedical Databases

    William Hsu;Sameer K. Antani;L. Rodney Long;Leif Neve

  • Content-Based Image Retrieval in Medicine: Retrospective Assessment, State of the Art, and Future Directions

    L. Rodney Long;Sameer K. Antani;Thomas Martin Deserno;George R. Thoma

Frequent Co-Authors

Sameer Antani
Sameer Antani National Institutes of Health
Dina Demner-Fushman
Dina Demner-Fushman National Institutes of Health
William V. Stoecker
William V. Stoecker Missouri University of Science and Technology
Kannappan Palaniappan
Kannappan Palaniappan University of Missouri
Daniel P. Lopresti
Daniel P. Lopresti Lehigh University
Harry Wechsler
Harry Wechsler George Mason University
Xiaolei Huang
Xiaolei Huang Pennsylvania State University
Venu Govindaraju
Venu Govindaraju University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Zhongfei Zhang
Zhongfei Zhang Binghamton University
Michael Gill
Michael Gill Trinity College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up a variety of online academic and career pathways. For those looking to quickly enter the workforce, there are 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These can equip you with practical skills in coding, cybersecurity, or data analysis, often with minimal time and financial investment.

If you’re seeking advanced credentials, the shortest masters degree programs let you upgrade your qualifications in as little as a year. Many students also consider the value of their degree—picking from masters degrees that are worth it to boost career prospects in fields like AI, data science, or software engineering.

For a flexible and affordable start, an online associate degree in computer science offers a pathway to entry-level roles or a transfer to bachelor’s programs. Whether you want a quick certification or a robust graduate degree, there are online options tailored to diverse goals and timelines in the technology sector.

Best Scientists Citing George R. Thoma

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles