World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
8125
World Ranking
6548
National Ranking
392

Paul Clough publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Clough sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 247 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Paul Clough D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Clough sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Clough is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their research spans interdisciplinary fields including Computer Science and Social Sciences, with specific contributions to Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, Safety Research, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics.

Their recent research works demonstrate a focus on network analysis techniques, software engineering, and social media studies. The topics covered in their publications include:

  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Topic Modeling
  • Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Media and Politics

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Paul Clough include:

  • "Paraphrase type identification for plagiarism detection using contexts and word embeddings," 2021, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
  • "Investigating clickbait in Chinese social media: A study of WeChat," 2020, Online Social Networks and Media
  • "Investigating the Usage of IoT-Based Smart Parking Services in the Borough of Westminster," 2021, Journal of Global Information Management
  • "Automated evaluation of comments to aid software maintenance," 2022, Journal of Software Evolution and Process
  • "Generative AI for Software Metadata: Overview of the Information Retrieval in Software Engineering Track at FIRE 2023," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, reflecting a variety of interdisciplinary research projects. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Srijoni Majumdar
  • Partha Pratim Das
  • Jahna Otterbacher
  • Faisal Alvi
  • Mark Stevenson

Paul Clough's work appears across several publication venues, illustrating an engagement with both educational and technological literature. These publication venues are:

  • International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
  • Online Social Networks and Media
  • Journal of Global Information Management
  • Journal of Software Evolution and Process
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

In addition to journal publications, Paul Clough has contributed to book literature, including an authored work titled Morality and Economic Growth in Rural West Africa, published by Berghahn Books in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Modelling vague places with knowledge from the Web

    C. B. Jones;R. S. Purves;P. D. Clough;H. Joho

  • Multilingual Information Access for Text, Speech and Images

    Carol Peters;Paul Clough;Julio Gonzalo;Gareth J. F. Jones

  • ENSM-SE at CLEF 2006 : Fuzzy Proximity Method with an Adhoc Influence Function in Evaluation of Multilingual and Multi-modal Information Retrieval 7th Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum, CLEF 2006, Alicante, Spain

    Carol Peters;Paul Clough;Fredric C. Gey;Jussi Karlgren

  • The CLEF 2005 cross–language image retrieval track

    Paul Clough;Henning Müller;Thomas Deselaers;Michael Grubinger

  • Overview of the ImageCLEFmed 2006 medical retrieval and medical annotation tasks

    Henning Müller;Thomas Deselaers;Thomas Deserno;Paul Clough

  • Plagiarism in natural and programming languages: an overview of current tools and technologies

    Paul Clough

  • Easy on that trigger dad: a study of long term family photo retrieval

    Steve Whittaker;Ofer Bergman;Paul Clough

  • Measuring Text Reuse

    Paul Clough;Robert Gaizauskas;Scott S.L. Piao;Yorick Wilks

  • The design and implementation of SPIRIT: a spatially aware search engine for information retrieval on the Internet

    Ross S. Purves;Paul Clough;Christopher B. Jones;Avi Arampatzis

  • ImageCLEF: Experimental Evaluation in Visual Information Retrieval

    Henning Mller;Paul Clough;Thomas Deselaers;Barbara Caputo

  • Do user preferences and evaluation measures line up

    Mark Sanderson;Monica Lestari Paramita;Paul Clough;Evangelos Kanoulas

  • The relationship between IR effectiveness measures and user satisfaction

    Azzah Al-Maskari;Mark Sanderson;Paul Clough

  • Old and new challenges in automatic plagiarism detection

    Paul Clough;Regent Court

  • Developing a corpus of plagiarised short answers

    Paul Clough;Mark Stevenson

  • Flickr: a first look at user behaviour in the context of photography as serious leisure

    Andrew M. Cox;Paul D. Clough;Jennifer Marlow

  • The CLEF Cross Language Image Retrieval Track (ImageCLEF) 2004

    Paul D. Clough;Mark Sanderson;Henning Müller

  • The CLEF 2004 cross-language image retrieval track

    Paul Clough;Henning Müller;Mark Sanderson

  • Competent Men and Warm Women: Gender Stereotypes and Backlash in Image Search Results

    Jahna Otterbacher;Jo Bates;Paul Clough

  • GeoCLEF: the CLEF 2005 cross-language geographic information retrieval track overview

    Fredric Gey;Ray Larson;Mark Sanderson;Hideo Joho

  • Extracting metadata for spatially-aware information retrieval on the internet

    Paul Clough

  • Overview of the ImageCLEFphoto 2008 photographic retrieval task

    Thomas Arni;Paul Clough;Mark Sanderson;Michael Grubinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Sanderson
Mark Sanderson RMIT University
Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson University of Melbourne
Henning Müller
Henning Müller University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland
Eneko Agirre
Eneko Agirre University of the Basque Country
Evangelos Kanoulas
Evangelos Kanoulas University of Amsterdam
Robert Gaizauskas
Robert Gaizauskas University of Sheffield
Ross S. Purves
Ross S. Purves University of Zurich
Thomas Deselaers
Thomas Deselaers Apple (United States)
Julio Gonzalo
Julio Gonzalo National University of Distance Education
Ben Carterette
Ben Carterette Spotify, US

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Computer Science continues to expand, offering numerous online degree options to fit diverse interests and career goals. Earning a degree from one of the highly accredited online universities in the USA can provide a strong foundation in both fundamentals and specialized skills, ensuring your qualification is recognized and valued by employers.

If you enjoy creativity and technology, consider pursuing a game design degree. These programs blend programming, storytelling, and visual design to prepare you for careers in the thriving gaming industry.

With cybersecurity threats on the rise, there is high demand for professionals trained through a reputable cybersecurity degree online. These degrees focus on safeguarding data, networks, and digital systems, opening doors to roles across all industries.

Computer Science skills are also crucial for fields like construction project management. A construction management degree online can equip you with the expertise to oversee modern, tech-driven building projects from anywhere in the world.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Clough

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles