World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alberto Barrón-Cedeño

Alberto Barrón-Cedeño

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
6143
World Ranking
6953
National Ranking
170

Alberto Barrón-Cedeño publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alberto Barrón-Cedeño sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 119 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alberto Barrón-Cedeño D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alberto Barrón-Cedeño sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alberto Barrón-Cedeño is affiliated with the University of Bologna in Italy. Their research domain primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Social Sciences, with a significant number of publications in Artificial Intelligence and Sociology and Political Science as subfields.

Their work often addresses topics such as:

  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Topic Modeling
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Software Engineering Research

Alberto Barrón-Cedeño has contributed to numerous recent papers including:

  • "Automated Fact-Checking for Assisting Human Fact-Checkers" (2021), published in Padua Research Archive (University of Padua)
  • "Cross-Language Source Code Re-Use Detection Using Latent Semantic Analysis" (2020), published in Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)
  • "SemEval-2020 Task 11: Detection of Propaganda Techniques in News Articles" (2020), published on arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Online information disorder: fake news, bots and trolls" (2022), published in International Journal of Data Science and Analytics
  • "Overview of the CLEF-2019 CheckThat!: Automatic Identification and Verification of Claims" (2021), published on arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors in Alberto Barrón-Cedeño's research include:

  • Giovanni Da San Martino
  • Preslav Nakov
  • Tamer Elsayed
  • Maram Hasanain
  • Fatima Haouari

Their publications appear predominantly in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Language Resources and Evaluation
  • International Journal of Data Science and Analytics
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Alberto Barrón-Cedeño has also contributed to book publications, including one with Springer Science+Business Media titled Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction published in 2022.

Best Publications

  • An Evaluation Framework for Plagiarism Detection

    Martin Potthast;Benno Stein;Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Paolo Rosso

  • Overview of the 2nd International Competition on Plagiarism Detection

    Martin Potthast;Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Andreas Eiselt;Benno Stein

  • Cross-language plagiarism detection

    Martin Potthast;Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Benno Stein;Paolo Rosso

  • Fine-Grained Analysis of Propaganda in News Article

    Giovanni Da San Martino;Seunghak Yu;Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Rostislav Petrov

  • Overview of the 1st international competition on plagiarism detection

    Martin Potthast;Benno Stein;Andreas Eiselt;Alberto Barrón-Cedeno

  • Overview of the author identification task at PAN 2014

    Efstathios Stamatatos;Walter Daelemans;Ben Verhoeven;Benno Stein

  • Proppy: Organizing the news based on their propagandistic content

    Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Israa Jaradat;Giovanni Da San Martino;Preslav Nakov

  • Plagiarism meets paraphrasing: Insights for the next generation in automatic plagiarism detection

    Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Marta Vila;M. Martí;Paolo Rosso

  • SemEval-2020 Task 11: Detection of Propaganda Techniques in News Articles

    Giovanni Da San Martino;Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Henning Wachsmuth;Rostislav Petrov

  • On Automatic Plagiarism Detection Based on n-Grams Comparison

    Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Paolo Rosso

  • Automated Fact-Checking for Assisting Human Fact-Checkers

    Preslav Nakov;David P. A. Corney;Maram Hasanain;Firoj Alam

  • A Survey on Computational Propaganda Detection.

    Giovanni Da San Martino;Stefano Cresci;Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Seunghak Yu

  • Plagiarism Detection across Distant Language Pairs

    Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Paolo Rosso;Eneko Agirre;Gorka Labaka

  • On cross-lingual plagiarism analysis using a statistical model

    Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Paolo Rosso;David Pinto;Alfons Juan

  • Overview of the CLEF-2018 CheckThat! Lab on Automatic Identification and Verification of Political Claims

    Preslav Nakov;Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Tamer Elsayed;Reem Suwaileh

  • Fully Automated Fact Checking Using External Sources

    Georgi Karadzhov;Preslav Nakov;Lluís Màrquez;Alberto Barrón-Cedeño

  • Methods for cross-language plagiarism detection

    Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Parth Gupta;Paolo Rosso

  • Overview of CheckThat! 2020: Automatic Identification and Verification of Claims in Social Media

    Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Tamer Elsayed;Preslav Nakov;Giovanni Da San Martino

  • A Context-Aware Approach for Detecting Worth-Checking Claims in Political Debates

    Pepa Gencheva;Preslav Nakov;Lluís Màrquez;Alberto Barrón-Cedeño

  • Overview of the CLEF-2019 CheckThat! Lab: Automatic Identification and Verification of Claims

    Tamer Elsayed;Preslav Nakov;Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Maram Hasanain

  • Fine-Grained Analysis of Propaganda in News Articles

    Giovanni Da San Martino;Seunghak Yu;Alberto Barrón-Cedeño;Rostislav Petrov

  • SemEval-2020 Task 11: Detection of Propaganda Techniques in News Articles

    G. Da San Martino;A. Barrón-Cedeño;H. Wachsmuth;R. Petrov

Frequent Co-Authors

Preslav Nakov
Preslav Nakov Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Paolo Rosso
Paolo Rosso Universitat Politècnica de València
Lluís Màrquez
Lluís Màrquez Amazon (United States)
Alessandro Moschitti
Alessandro Moschitti Amazon (United States)
Benno Stein
Benno Stein Bauhaus University, Weimar
Shafiq Joty
Shafiq Joty Salesforce (United States)
Martin Potthast
Martin Potthast Leipzig University
Yonatan Belinkov
Yonatan Belinkov Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Kareem Darwish
Kareem Darwish Hamad bin Khalifa University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree options and career pathways. Many students consider the fastest associates degree programs to quickly enter tech fields or build a foundation for further study.

If you are interested in pursuing advanced leadership or academic roles, looking at programs like an online edd could be the right move. These degrees enhance skills in research, management, and educational technology—valuable for tech educators and administrators.

Choosing a reliable university is crucial. There are many good online colleges that offer accredited and flexible computer science programs suitable for various career objectives.

Interested in the gaming industry? Explore the video game programs available online, which blend creative arts with coding and game development skills—preparing students for dynamic tech roles in this growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Alberto Barrón-Cedeño

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles