World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 54 4568 4439 2136 2061 274 11623

Shafiq Joty publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shafiq Joty between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shafiq Joty published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 19.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 68 publications in 2023. 46 of the 390 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 68. Peak 68 publications in 2023. 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 35 publications 2021: 41 publications 2022: 37 publications 2023: 68 publications 2024: 54 publications 2025: 44 publications 2026: 2 publications
2007 2026

390 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shafiq Joty: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 4
2008 7
2009 3
2010 1
2011 4
2012 1
2013 5
2014 8
2015 8
2016 13
2017 16
2018 20
2019 19
2020 35
2021 41
2022 37
2023 68
2024 54
2025 44
2026 2
Total 390
Download as CSV

Shafiq Joty publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shafiq Joty sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 272–281 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 274 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335 274
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Shafiq Joty D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shafiq Joty sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500 54
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Shafiq Joty is affiliated with Salesforce in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science. Their research spans various subfields, primarily focusing on artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, information systems, signal processing, and general health professions.

The scientist's work is concentrated on several main topics including topic modeling, natural language processing techniques, multimodal machine learning applications, domain adaptation and few-shot learning, speech and dialogue systems, advanced text analysis techniques, and text readability and simplification.

Among Shafiq Joty's recent publications are:

  • CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generation (2021), Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillation (2021), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Conversational Agents in Health Care: Scoping Review and Conceptual Analysis (2020), Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning (2022), Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022
  • Chart-to-Text: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Chart Summarization (2022), Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
  • Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering

Collaborators frequently coauthoring research with Shafiq Joty are:

  • Caiming Xiong
  • Chengwei Qin
  • Steven C. H. Hoi
  • Lidong Bing
  • Chien-Sheng Wu

Shafiq Joty's body of work includes over 360 publications, the majority of which lie within computer science disciplines, particularly in artificial intelligence. Their contributions reflect ongoing engagement with both foundational and applied research topics within these fields.

Best Publications

  • CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generation

    Yue Wang;Weishi Wang;Shafiq R. Joty;Steven C. H. Hoi

  • Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillation

    Junnan Li;Ramprasaath R. Selvaraju;Akhilesh Deepak Gotmare;Shafiq R. Joty

  • Fine-grained Opinion Mining with Recurrent Neural Networks and Word Embeddings

    Pengfei Liu;Shafiq Joty;Helen Meng

  • Look, Imagine and Match: Improving Textual-Visual Cross-Modal Retrieval with Generative Models

    Jiuxiang Gu;Jianfei Cai;Shafiq Joty;Li Niu

  • Sleep Quality Prediction From Wearable Data Using Deep Learning

    Aarti Sathyanarayana;Shafiq Joty;Luis Fernandez-Luque;Ferda Ofli

  • GeDi: Generative Discriminator Guided Sequence Generation

    Ben Krause;Akhilesh Deepak Gotmare;Bryan McCann;Nitish Shirish Keskar

  • DeepER - Deep Entity Resolution.

    Muhammad Ebraheem;Saravanan Thirumuruganathan;Shafiq R. Joty;Mourad Ouzzani

  • Unpaired Image Captioning via Scene Graph Alignments

    Jiuxiang Gu;Shafiq Joty;Jianfei Cai;Handong Zhao

  • Robust classification of crisis-related data on social networks using convolutional neural networks

    Dat Tien Nguyen;Kamela Ali Al Mannai;Shafiq Joty;Hassan Sajjad

  • Distributed representations of tuples for entity resolution

    Muhammad Ebraheem;Saravanan Thirumuruganathan;Shafiq Joty;Mourad Ouzzani

  • Combining Intra- and Multi-sentential Rhetorical Parsing for Document-level Discourse Analysis

    Shafiq Joty;Giuseppe Carenini;Raymond Ng;Yashar Mehdad

  • Codra: A novel discriminative framework for rhetorical analysis

    Shafiq Joty;Giuseppe Carenini;Raymond T. Ng

  • ANR: Aspect-based Neural Recommender

    Jin Yao Chin;Kaiqi Zhao;Shafiq Joty;Gao Cong

  • DAGA: Data Augmentation with a Generation Approach for Low-resource Tagging Tasks

    Bosheng Ding;Linlin Liu;Lidong Bing;Canasai Kruengkrai

  • Domain Adaptation with Adversarial Training and Graph Embeddings

    Firoj Alam;Shafiq R. Joty;Muhammad Imran

  • Using Discourse Structure Improves Machine Translation Evaluation

    Francisco Guzmán;Shafiq Joty;Llu'is Màrquez;Preslav Nakov

  • Impact of Physical Activity on Sleep: A Deep Learning Based Exploration.

    Aarti Sathyanarayana;Shafiq R. Joty;Luis Fernández-Luque;Ferda Ofli

  • SegBot: A Generic Neural Text Segmentation Model with Pointer Network

    Jing Li;Aixin Sun;Shafiq Rayhan Joty

  • Sentence-level evidence embedding for claim verification with hierarchical attention networks

    Jing Ma;Wei Gao;Shafiq R. Joty;Kam-Fai Wong

  • Unpaired Image Captioning by Language Pivoting

    Jiuxiang Gu;Shafiq Rayhan Joty;Jianfei Cai;Gang Wang

  • VD-BERT: A Unified Vision and Dialog Transformer with BERT

    Yue Wang;Shafiq R. Joty;Michael R. Lyu;Irwin King

Frequent Co-Authors

Preslav Nakov
Preslav Nakov Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Lluís Màrquez
Lluís Màrquez Amazon (United States)
Giuseppe Carenini
Giuseppe Carenini University of British Columbia
Jianfei Cai
Jianfei Cai Monash University
Steven C. H. Hoi
Steven C. H. Hoi Alibaba Group (China)
Alessandro Moschitti
Alessandro Moschitti Amazon (United States)
Raymond T. Ng
Raymond T. Ng University of British Columbia
Caiming Xiong
Caiming Xiong Salesforce (United States)
Alberto Barrón-Cedeño
Alberto Barrón-Cedeño University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science opens up diverse career possibilities and connects with several related fields. Many students explore flexible learning options through online accredited colleges, making it easier to balance education with other commitments.

Online programs have expanded to include specialized areas such as game development. Choosing the best online game design degree can lead to careers in the rapidly growing gaming industry, combining creativity with technical skills.

Cybersecurity is another high-demand field connected to computer science. For those concerned about affordability, options like a cyber security online degree cost analysis can help identify programs that deliver value without high tuition fees.

Computer science knowledge is also increasingly relevant in fields like construction management. Obtaining a construction management degree online allows students to gain tech skills needed for modern project leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Shafiq Joty

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles