World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
22013
World Ranking
16735
National Ranking
8394

Paul M. Ness publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Ness sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 431 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul M. Ness D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Ness sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul M. Ness is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research predominantly focuses on the field of Medicine, with notable contributions across several subfields, including Biochemistry, Management of Technology and Innovation, Hematology, Genetics, and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine.

Their work centers mainly on blood transfusion and management, covering topics such as blood donation and transfusion practices, trauma and emergency care studies, trauma, hemostasis, coagulopathy, resuscitation, hemoglobinopathies and related disorders, blood groups and transfusion, and cardiac arrest and resuscitation.

Frequent publication venues for Paul M. Ness include:

  • Transfusion
  • Anesthesia & Analgesia
  • UNC Libraries
  • The Journal of Pediatrics
  • Blood Advances

They have co-authored extensively with several researchers, including:

  • Evan M. Bloch
  • Aaron A.R. Tobian
  • Ruchika Goel
  • Eric A. Gehrie
  • Cassandra D. Josephson

Among their recent published papers are:

  • Variation in Neonatal Transfusion Practice, 2021, The Journal of Pediatrics
  • Civilian walking blood bank emergency preparedness plan, 2021, Transfusion
  • Blood transfusion trends in the United States: national inpatient sample, 2015 to 2018, 2021, Blood Advances
  • Individual- and hospital-level correlates of red blood cell, platelet, and plasma transfusions among hospitalized children and neonates: a nationally representative study in the United States, 2020, Transfusion
  • Perioperative Transfusions and Venous Thromboembolism, 2020, PEDIATRICS

Best Publications

  • Improved survival in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome. Clinical experience in 108 patients.

    William R. Bell;Hayden G. Braine;Paul M. Ness;Thomas S. Kickler

  • The Declining Risk of Post-Transfusion Hepatitis C Virus Infection

    James G. Donahue;Alvaro Muñoz;Paul M. Ness;Donald E. Brown

  • Dose of prophylactic platelet transfusions and prevention of hemorrhage.

    Sherrill J. Slichter;Richard M. Kaufman;Susan F. Assmann;Jeffrey McCullough

  • Effects of Red-Cell Storage Duration on Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

    Marie E. Steiner;Paul M. Ness;Susan F. Assmann;Darrell J. Triulzi

  • Fibrin glue: the perfect operative sealant?

    J W Gibble;P M Ness

  • The effect of previous pregnancy and transfusion on HLA alloimmunization in blood donors: implications for a transfusion-related acute lung injury risk reduction strategy

    Darrell J. Triulzi;Steven Kleinman;Ram M. Kakaiya;Michael. P. Busch

  • Coronary thrombosis in myocardial infarction. Report of a workshop on the role of coronary thrombosis in the pathogenesis of acute myocardial infarction.

    A.Bleakley Chandler;Irving Chapman;Leif R. Erhardt;William C. Roberts

  • Septic reactions to platelet transfusions. A persistent problem.

    John F. Morrow;Hayden G. Braine;Thomas S. Kickler;Paul M. Ness

  • The differentiation of delayed serologic and delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions: incidence, long-term serologic findings, and clinical significance

    Paul M. Ness;R. S. Shirey;S. K. Thoman;S. A. Buck

  • Single-donor platelets reduce the risk of septic platelet transfusion reactions

    Paul Ness;Hayden Braine;Karen King;Christine Barrasso

  • Universal leukoreduction decreases the incidence of febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions to RBCs

    Karen E. King;R. Sue Shirey;Sandra K. Thoman;Debra Bensen-Kennedy

  • Platelet transfusions in platelet consumptive disorders are associated With arterial thrombosis and in-hospital mortality

    Ruchika Goel;Paul M. Ness;Clifford M. Takemoto;Lakshmanan Krishnamurti

  • The life-sustaining capacity of human polymerized hemoglobin when red cells might be unavailable.

    Steven A Gould;Ernest E Moore;David B Hoyt;Paul M Ness

  • Efficacy of transfusion with granulocytes from G-CSF/dexamethasone–treated donors in neutropenic patients with infection

    Thomas H. Price;Michael Boeckh;Michael Boeckh;Ryan W. Harrison;Jeffrey McCullough

  • Indications for and Adverse Effects of Red-Cell Transfusion

    Jeffrey L. Carson;Darrell J. Triulzi;Paul M. Ness

  • Acquired FV inhibitors: a needless iatrogenic complication of bovine thrombin exposure.

    Michael B. Streiff;Paul M. Ness

  • A randomized trial of perioperative hemodilution versus transfusion of preoperatively deposited autologous blood in elective surgery.

    P.M. Ness;D.L. Bourke;P.C. Walsh

  • The contribution of sociodemographic, medical, and attitudinal factors to blood donation among the general public.

    L.E. Boulware;L.E. Ratner;P.M. Ness;L.A. Cooper

  • Variability in blood and blood component utilization as assessed by an anesthesia information management system

    Steven M. Frank;Will J. Savage;Jim A. Rothschild;Richard J. Rivers

  • Blood banking in China

    Hua Shan;Jing Xing Wang;Fu Rong Ren;Yuan Zhi Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Aaron A.R. Tobian
Aaron A.R. Tobian Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Thomas S. Kickler
Thomas S. Kickler Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Kenrad Edwin Nelson
Kenrad Edwin Nelson Johns Hopkins University
Jing Liu
Jing Liu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Edward L. Murphy
Edward L. Murphy University of California, San Francisco
Michael P. Busch
Michael P. Busch University of California, San Francisco
Jeffrey McCullough
Jeffrey McCullough University of Minnesota
Scott M. Lippman
Scott M. Lippman University of California, San Diego
Steven Kleinman
Steven Kleinman University of British Columbia
John R. Hess
John R. Hess University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens up various opportunities beyond pursuing an MD. Today, there are many flexible online programs that support healthcare professionals at different stages of their journey.

For those interested in healthcare administration, online medical billing and coding courses provide the technical skills needed to work in healthcare facilities, insurance, or medical offices. These programs offer a pathway for entering the medical field without direct patient care.

If you’re considering becoming a nurse, there are a variety of affordable nursing programs available online. For more advanced roles, such as becoming a nurse practitioner, you can find some of the cheapest online np programs to further your clinical skills and increase your earning potential.

Ambitious nurses looking to lead research or teach at universities can pursue an online nursing doctorate. This pathway offers the highest level of nursing education and prepares graduates for leadership roles in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Paul M. Ness

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles