World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 76 1917 78 391 20192
Medicine 77 18456 682 423 21164

Anneke Brand publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anneke Brand between 1975 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anneke Brand published across 50 years, from 1975 to 2024, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2010. 1 of the 429 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2010. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 15 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 15 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 32 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1975 2024

429 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anneke Brand: publications per year, 1975 to 2024
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 2
1977 4
1978 5
1979 2
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 3
1985 4
1986 1
1987 4
1988 7
1989 14
1990 6
1991 12
1992 6
1993 11
1994 15
1995 10
1996 7
1997 15
1998 8
1999 9
2000 8
2001 11
2002 11
2003 10
2004 12
2005 11
2006 14
2007 14
2008 22
2009 12
2010 32
2011 20
2012 15
2013 25
2014 10
2015 15
2016 14
2017 10
2018 6
2019 5
2020 3
2021 1
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
Total 429
Download as CSV

Anneke Brand publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anneke Brand sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 382–391 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 391 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71 391
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

Anneke Brand D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anneke Brand sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163 76
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Anneke Brand is affiliated with Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine with a specialized emphasis on Hematology, supported by contributions in Physiology, Immunology, Family Practice, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The main topics explored in their work include:

  • Blood groups and transfusion
  • Platelet Disorders and Treatments
  • Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
  • Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Blood transfusion and management

Anneke Brand has contributed to multiple research articles published across several venues. The frequent publication venues include:

  • Transfusion Clinique et Biologique
  • Transfusion and Apheresis Science
  • Transfusion
  • Vox Sanguinis

Selected recent papers by Anneke Brand are:

  • "Review of indications for immunoglobulin (IG) use: Narrowing the gap between supply and demand," 2020, Transfusion Clinique et Biologique
  • "Medical student education in transfusion medicine, part II: Moving forward to building up a 'Know How' education program in transfusion medicine for under-graduate medical students," 2020, Transfusion and Apheresis Science
  • "Anti-D immunization after D positive platelet transfusions in D negative recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis," 2024, Transfusion
  • "Prevalence of red-blood-cell and non-red-blood-cell-targeted autoantibodies in alloimmunized postpartum women," 2020, Vox Sanguinis

Collaboration is evident in Anneke Brand's research through frequent co-authorship with:

  • Olivier Garraud
  • Miquel Lozano
  • Henk Schonewille
  • Vincenzo De Angelis
  • Tomislav Vuk

The scope of their work shows an engagement with both clinical and educational aspects of transfusion medicine, emphasizing blood group compatibility, platelet disorders, and immunological responses following transfusion. Their contributions also extend to advancing medical education in transfusion medicine, aiming to enhance knowledge transfer to undergraduate medical students.

Best Publications

  • Platelet transfusion versus standard care after acute stroke due to spontaneous cerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet therapy (patch): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

    M. Irem Baharoglu;Charlotte Cordonnier;Rustam Al-Shahi Salman;Koen De Gans

  • Morbidity and mortality in adults with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura

    Johanna E. A. Portielje;Rudi G. J. Westendorp;Hanneke C. Kluin-Nelemans;Anneke Brand

  • Beneficial Effects of Leukocyte Depletion of Transfused Blood on Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Leo M.G. van de Watering;Jo Hermans;Jos G.A. Houbiers;Pieter J. van den Broek

  • Red blood cell alloantibodies after transfusion: factors influencing incidence and specificity

    Henk Schonewille;Leo M.G. Van De Watering;Dominique S.E. Loomans;Anneke Brand

  • Feasibility of Immunotherapy of Relapsed Leukemia With Ex Vivo–Generated Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Specific for Hematopoietic System-Restricted Minor Histocompatibility Antigens

    Tuna Mutis;Rob Verdijk;Ellen Schrama;Bennie Esendam

  • Randomised controlled trial comparing transfusion of leucocyte-depleted or buffy-coat-depleted blood in surgery for colorectal cancer

    J.G.A Houbiers;A Brand;L.M.G van de Watering;C.J.H van de Velde

  • Polyriboinosinic Polyribocytidylic Acid (Poly(I:C)) Induces Stable Maturation of Functionally Active Human Dendritic Cells

    Rob M. Verdijk;Tuna Mutis;Ben Esendam;Janine Kamp

  • High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

    P.A. van Doorn;A. Brand;P.F.W. Strengers;J. Meulstee

  • In vitro induction of human cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses against peptides of mutant and wild-type p53.

    J. G. A. Houbiers;H. W. Nijman;S. H. Van Der Burg;J. W. Drijfhout

  • Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Leukocyte-Depleted Erythrocyte Transfusions in Cardiac Valve Surgery

    Y.M. Bilgin;L.M.G. van de Watering;L. Eijsman;M.I.M. Versteegh

  • Effects of storage time of red blood cell transfusions on the prognosis of coronary artery bypass graft patients

    Leo van de Watering;Jos Lorinser;Michel Versteegh;Rudi Westendord

  • Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a double blind, placebo controlled study.

    M. Vermeulen;P. A. Van Doorn;A. Brand;P. F. W. Strengers

  • Pregnancy induces minor histocompatibility antigen–specific cytotoxic T cells: implications for stem cell transplantation and immunotherapy

    Rob M Verdijk;Antoinette Kloosterman;Jos Pool;Maarten van de Keur

  • Long-term follow-up of severe aplastic anaemia patients treated with antithymocyte globulin. Severe Aplastic Anaemia Working Party of the European Cooperative Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).

    de Planque Mm;Bacigalupo A;Würsch A;Hows Jm

  • Transfusion of red cells is associated with increased incidence of bacterial infection after colorectal surgery: a prospective study.

    J.G.A. Houbiers;C.J.H. van de Veld;L.M. Watering;J. Hermans

  • Immunological aspects of blood transfusions.

    Anneke Brand

  • Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome after intrauterine transfusion for hemolytic disease of the fetus/newborn: the LOTUS study.

    Irene T. Lindenburg;Vivianne E. Smits-Wintjens;Jeanine M. van Klink;Esther Verduin

  • Recognition of minor histocompatibility antigens on lymphocytic and myeloid leukemic cells by cytotoxic T-cell clones.

    van der D. Harst;E.A.J.M. Goulmy;J.H.F. Falkenburg;Y.M.C. Kooij-Winkelaar

  • Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with improvement.

    P. A. van Doom;M. Vermeulen;A. Brand;P. G. H. Mulder

  • Occurrence of Allogeneic HLA and Non-HLA Antibodies After Transfusion of Prestorage Filtered Platelets and Red Blood Cells: A Prospective Study

    V. M. J. Novotny;R. Van Doorn;M. D. Witvliet;F. H. J. Claas

  • Antibodies against p53 are associated with poor prognosis of colorectal cancer.

    J. G. A. Houbiers;S. H. Van Der Burg;L. M. G. Van De Watering;R. A. E. M. Tollenaar

Frequent Co-Authors

Frans H.J. Claas
Frans H.J. Claas Leiden University Medical Center
Marinus Vermeulen
Marinus Vermeulen University of Amsterdam
Dave L. Roelen
Dave L. Roelen Leiden University Medical Center
Jaap Jan Zwaginga
Jaap Jan Zwaginga Leiden University Medical Center
Els Goulmy
Els Goulmy Leiden University Medical Center
P.A. van Doorn
P.A. van Doorn Erasmus University Rotterdam
Willem E. Fibbe
Willem E. Fibbe Leiden University Medical Center
Ilias I.N. Doxiadis
Ilias I.N. Doxiadis Leiden University Medical Center
J. J. Van Rood
J. J. Van Rood Leiden University
Machteld Oudshoorn
Machteld Oudshoorn Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Immunology, exploring related healthcare fields can offer diverse career opportunities. Nursing is a popular path that complements immunology knowledge, with several online options available. Non-nurses looking to enter the field can consider the best online rn programs for non nurses, which provide a solid foundation for patient care and clinical experience.

If you want a quicker entry into nursing, exploring the easiest accelerated nursing programs can be a smart choice. These programs allow students with prior degrees to transition efficiently into a nursing career, often pairing well with immunology specialties such as infectious diseases or allergy treatments.

For those seeking practical nursing roles, the easy lpn programs to get into offer accessible pathways with shorter timeframes. Licensed Practical Nurses often work under the supervision of immunologists in clinical settings, providing hands-on patient support.

Finally, advancing your career as a Family Nurse Practitioner is possible through the easiest fnp program options. FNPs frequently handle immunology-related care, including chronic conditions and immune therapies, making this a valuable step for career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Anneke Brand

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles