World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 100 8178 7689 799 762 450 45712

Richard A. C. Hughes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard A. C. Hughes between 1963 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard A. C. Hughes published across 63 years, from 1963 to 2025, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2002. 6 of the 455 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1963 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2002. 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 3 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 7 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 12 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 13 publications 1991: 13 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 16 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 26 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
1963 2025

455 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard A. C. Hughes: publications per year, 1963 to 2025
Year Publications
1963 1
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 1
1975 1
1976 1
1977 3
1978 3
1979 1
1980 3
1981 7
1982 3
1983 2
1984 12
1985 8
1986 3
1987 6
1988 5
1989 6
1990 13
1991 13
1992 11
1993 12
1994 16
1995 13
1996 7
1997 14
1998 9
1999 13
2000 12
2001 14
2002 26
2003 14
2004 22
2005 16
2006 18
2007 12
2008 16
2009 15
2010 18
2011 15
2012 12
2013 4
2014 10
2015 9
2016 5
2017 7
2018 2
2019 2
2020 3
2021 5
2022 1
2023 2
2024 4
2025 2
Total 455
Download as CSV

Richard A. C. Hughes publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. C. Hughes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 450 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 450
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard A. C. Hughes D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. C. Hughes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 100
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard A. C. Hughes is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine with a focus on infectious diseases, immunology, pathology and forensic medicine, genetics, and oncology. Their research primarily addresses topics such as SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, biosimilars and bioanalytical methods, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, multiple sclerosis, immunodeficiency and autoimmune disorders, and autoimmune bullous skin diseases.

They have published research in several prominent venues, notably:

  • Neurology
  • Revue Neurologique
  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • Bioanalysis
  • JAMA Network Open

Frequent co-authors of Richard A. C. Hughes include:

  • Stephen L. Hauser
  • Licínio Craveiro
  • Harold Koendgen
  • Annette Sauter
  • Tobias Derfuß

Their recent published papers include:

  • "Safety of Ocrelizumab in Patients With Relapsing and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis," 2021, Neurology
  • "COVID-19 in ocrelizumab-treated people with multiple sclerosis," 2020, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • "COVID-19 in persons with multiple sclerosis treated with ocrelizumab - A pharmacovigilance case series," 2020, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • "Genome-Wide Association Studies of ARIA From the Aducanumab Phase 3 ENGAGE and EMERGE Studies," 2023, Neurology
  • "P36 Serum immunoglobulin levels and risk of serious infections in the pivotal phase III trials of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis and their open-label extensions," 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology

The researcher's work extensively covers multiple sclerosis, including treatment safety and COVID-19 implications for patients receiving ocrelizumab. Their investigations also intersect with pharmacovigilance and immunological responses tied to autoimmune and infectious diseases.

Best Publications

  • Neuropathic pain Redefinition and a grading system for clinical and research purposes

    R. D. Treede;T. S. Jensen;J. N. Campbell;G. Cruccu

  • Guillain-Barré syndrome

    Richard A C Hughes;David R Cornblath

  • CONTROLLED TRIAL OF PREDNISOLONE IN ACUTE POLYNEUROPATHY

    R.A.C. Hughes;J.M. Newsom-Davis;G.D. Perkin;J.M. Pierce

  • 119th ENMC international workshop: trial design in adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, with the exception of inclusion body myositis, 10-12 October 2003, Naarden, The Netherlands.

    Jessica E Hoogendijk;Anthony A Amato;Bryan R Lecky;Ernest H Choy

  • Electrophysiological classification of guillain-barré syndrome: Clinical associations and outcome

    R. D. M. Hadden;D. R. Cornblath;R. A. C. Hughes;J. Zielasek

  • Campylobacter jejuni infection and Guillain-Barré syndrome.

    Jeremy H. Rees;Sara E. Soudain;Norman A. Gregson;Richard A.C. Hughes

  • Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia.

    Michael P T Lunn;Richard A C Hughes;Philip J Wiffen

  • Intravenous immune globulin (10% caprylate-chromatography purified) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (ICE study): a randomised placebo-controlled trial

    Richard A C Hughes;Peter Donofrio;Vera Bril;Marinos C Dalakas

  • Intravenous immunoglobulin for Guillain-Barré syndrome

    Richard A C Hughes;Anthony V Swan;Pieter A van Doorn

  • Guillain-Barré syndrome and Fisher syndrome: case definitions and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.

    James J. Sejvar;Katrin S. Kohl;Jane Gidudu;Anthony Amato

  • Epidemiology of peripheral neuropathy.

    C. N. Martyn;R. A. C. Hughes

  • Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy

    Brian C Callaghan;Ann A Little;Eva L Feldman;Richard A C Hughes

  • Randomized controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin versus oral prednisolone in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

    R Hughes;Peter Van den Bergh;S Bensa;H Willison

  • Diagnosis and management of Guillain–Barré syndrome in ten steps

    Sonja E. Leonhard;Melissa R. Mandarakas;Francisco A. A. Gondim;Kathleen Bateman

  • Clinical and Epidemiologic Features of Guillain-Barré Syndrome

    Richard A. C. Hughes;Jeremy H. Rees

  • European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on management of multifocal motor neuropathy. Report of a Joint Task Force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society - first revision

    Robert D. Hadden;Eduardo Nobile-Orazio;Claudia Sommer;Angelika Hahn

  • Immunotherapy for Guillain-Barré syndrome: A systematic review

    Richard A C Hughes;Anthony V Swan;Jean-Claude Raphaël;Djillali Annane

  • Pathogenesis Of Guillain-Barre Syndrome

    R.A.C. Hughes;R.D.M. Hadden;N.A. Gregson;K.J. Smith

  • Preceding infections, immune factors, and outcome in Guillain-Barré syndrome

    R.D.M. Hadden;R.D.M. Hadden;H. Karch;H.-P. Hartung;H.-P. Hartung;J. Zielasek

  • Plasma exchange for Guillain‐Barré syndrome

    Jean Claude Raphaël;Sylvie Chevret;Richard A C Hughes;Djillali Annane

Frequent Co-Authors

David R. Cornblath
David R. Cornblath Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Hugh J. Willison
Hugh J. Willison University of Glasgow
Hans-Peter Hartung
Hans-Peter Hartung Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Marinos C. Dalakas
Marinos C. Dalakas Thomas Jefferson University
Norman Latov
Norman Latov Cornell University
Kenneth Smith
Kenneth Smith University of Nottingham
Irene J Higginson
Irene J Higginson King's College London
P.A. van Doorn
P.A. van Doorn Erasmus University Rotterdam
Claudia Sommer
Claudia Sommer University of Würzburg
Bart C. Jacobs
Bart C. Jacobs Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternatives to traditional medical degrees can open more flexible and accessible career options in healthcare. Many students interested in medical fields start with roles such as medical billing and coding. For those needing financial support, medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid offer pathways to begin a healthcare career without overwhelming debt.

Nursing is another attractive entry point, but there can be barriers like entrance exams. If you’re concerned about the TEAS test, discover the answer to do I need to take the TEAS test for LPN and find schools with less restrictive admissions processes.

For those aiming to advance quickly, accelerated healthcare programs can help you earn your degree faster, getting you into the workforce or leadership roles sooner. Experienced nurses interested in advanced practice roles can look to RN to NP programs for streamlined routes from associate degrees to nurse practitioner licensure.

Each of these online pathways provides flexibility, financial aid opportunities, and clear routes for career advancement in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Richard A. C. Hughes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles