World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bart C.J.M. Fauser

Bart C.J.M. Fauser

Award Badge
Medicine
Netherlands
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
119
Citations
72810
World Ranking
3823
National Ranking
148

Bart C.J.M. Fauser publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart C.J.M. Fauser sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 502 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Bart C.J.M. Fauser D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart C.J.M. Fauser sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2019 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Bart C.J.M. Fauser is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a primary focus on reproductive medicine. Their research spans various subfields including public health, environmental and occupational health, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, obstetrics and gynecology, as well as cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Reproductive biology and fertility
  • Assisted reproductive technology and twin pregnancy
  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Reproductive health and technologies
  • Endometriosis research and treatment
  • Hormonal and reproductive studies

Their recent publications include:

  • Does an association exist between menstrual cycle length within the normal range and ovarian reserve biomarkers during the reproductive years? A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020), published in Human Reproduction Update
  • A Polygenic and Phenotypic Risk Prediction for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Evaluated by Phenome-Wide Association Studies (2020), published in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • Early Onset of Coronary Artery Calcification in Women With Previous Preeclampsia (2020), published in Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Randomized Controlled Trial of Neurokinin 3 Receptor Antagonist Fezolinetant for Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (2021), published in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • The cardiovascular risk profile of middle age women previously diagnosed with premature ovarian insufficiency: A case-control study (2020), published in PLoS ONE

Frequent coauthors collaborating with them include:

  • Joop S.E. Laven
  • Juan A. García-Velasco
  • Kamal Ahuja
  • Jacques Cohen
  • Nick Macklon

Bart C.J.M. Fauser's work has been published repeatedly in notable venues such as:

  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online
  • Fertility and Sterility
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Medicine

Among their academic contributions is a book titled Female Reproductive Dysfunction, published by Springer International Publishing in 2020.

The scientist has been recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome

    Bart C. J. M. Fauser

  • Consensus on women's health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): The Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group

    Bart C.J.M. Fauser;Basil C. Tarlatzis;Robert W. Rebar;Richard S. Legro

  • Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome

    Helena J. Teede;Helena J. Teede;Marie L. Misso;Marie L. Misso;Michael F. Costello;Anuja Dokras

  • ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria

    A.P. Ferraretti;A. La Marca;B.C.J.M. Fauser;B. Tarlatzis

  • Anti‐Müllerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitment

    Christien Weenen;Joop S.E. Laven;Anne R.M. von Bergh;Mark Cranfield

  • Ovarian Aging: Mechanisms and Clinical Consequences

    F. J. Broekmans;M. R. Soules;B. C. Fauser

  • SERUM ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE LEVELS: A NOVEL MEASURE OF OVARIAN RESERVE

    I.A.J. van Rooij;F.J.M. Broekmans;E.R. te Velde;B.C.J.M. Fauser

  • Antimüllerian hormone serum levels: a putative marker for ovarian aging.

    Annemarie de Vet;Joop S.E. Laven;Frank H. de Jong;Axel P.N. Themmen

  • A meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

    C.M. Boomsma;M.J.C. Eijkemans;E.G. Hughes;G.H.A. Visser

  • Conception to ongoing pregnancy: the ‘black box’ of early pregnancy loss

    N S Macklon;J P M Geraedts;B C J M Fauser

  • Primary ovarian insufficiency

    Michel De Vos;Paul Devroey;Bart C. J. M. Fauser

  • Fertility and ageing.

    D T Baird;J Collins;J Egozcue;L H Evers

  • Anti-Müllerian Hormone Serum Concentrations in Normoovulatory and Anovulatory Women of Reproductive Age

    Joop S. E. Laven;Annemarie G. M. G. J. Mulders;Jenny A. Visser;Axel P. Themmen

  • Association of Age at Onset of Menopause and Time Since Onset of Menopause With Cardiovascular Outcomes, Intermediate Vascular Traits, and All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Taulant Muka;Clare Oliver-Williams;Setor K Kunutsor;Joop S E Laven

  • Manipulation of Human Ovarian Function: Physiological Concepts and Clinical Consequences

    Bart C. J. M. Fauser;Arne M. van Heusden

  • Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial

    Esther B. Baart;Elena Martini;Marinus J Eijkemans;Diane Van Opstal

  • Intraovarian control of early folliculogenesis

    Aaron J. W. Hsueh;Kazuhiro Kawamura;Yuan Cheng;Bart C. J. M. Fauser

  • Anti-Müllerian hormone: ovarian reserve testing and its potential clinical implications.

    Simone L. Broer;Frank J.M. Broekmans;Joop S.E. Laven;Bart C.J.M. Fauser

  • The management of anovulatory infertility in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance

    Adam H. Balen;Lara C. Morley;Marie Misso;Stephen Franks

  • The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.

    Nick S. Macklon;Richard L. Stouffer;Linda C. Giudice;Bart C. J. M. Fauser

Frequent Co-Authors

Nick S. Macklon
Nick S. Macklon University of Copenhagen
Joop S.E. Laven
Joop S.E. Laven Erasmus University Rotterdam
Marinus J.C. Eijkemans
Marinus J.C. Eijkemans Utrecht University
Frank J.M. Broekmans
Frank J.M. Broekmans Utrecht University
Paul Devroey
Paul Devroey Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Frank H. de Jong
Frank H. de Jong Erasmus University Rotterdam
Axel P. N. Themmen
Axel P. N. Themmen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Basil C. Tarlatzis
Basil C. Tarlatzis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Wim C. J. Hop
Wim C. J. Hop Erasmus University Rotterdam
Yvonne T. van der Schouw
Yvonne T. van der Schouw Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways and related degrees can expand your career options in the health sector. Many students consider affordable options such as the cheapest online bsn to dnp programs to advance their nursing education and qualify for higher clinical or leadership positions.

If you’re interested in pharmacy, pharm d online programs offer flexible learning that prepares graduates for a professional pharmacy license. Diverse career routes also include health informatics; accredited rhit programs online train students in medical information management, opening roles in both clinical and administrative settings.

For those seeking entry-level positions, understanding medical billing and coding certification cost can be valuable. Certification in this field offers quick access to medical office roles, with demand continuing to grow nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Bart C.J.M. Fauser

Trending Scientists