World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
32464
World Ranking
12139
National Ranking
30

Basil C. Tarlatzis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Basil C. Tarlatzis sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 485 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Basil C. Tarlatzis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Basil C. Tarlatzis sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Basil C. Tarlatzis is affiliated with the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki in Greece and has focused research efforts primarily within the field of Medicine, contributing a total of 82 publications. Their work is particularly concentrated in several subfields, including Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Immunology, and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The main research topics covered by Basil C. Tarlatzis include:

  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Frequent collaborators in Basil C. Tarlatzis's research include:

  • Grigoris Grimbizis (12 co-publications)
  • Efstratios M. Kolibianakis (8 co-publications)
  • Dimitrios G. Goulis (7 co-publications)
  • Katerina Chatzimeletiou (7 co-publications)
  • Theoni B Tarlatzi (5 co-publications)

Publications by Basil C. Tarlatzis are often featured in several key venues within reproductive and medical research, notably:

  • Human Reproduction (5 publications)
  • Human Reproduction Update (4 publications)
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (4 publications)
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online (4 publications)
  • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine (3 publications)

Representative recent papers include:

  • "Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature," 2023, Human Reproduction Update
  • "Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously or after ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis," 2020, Human Reproduction Update
  • "A picture of medically assisted reproduction activities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe," 2020, Human Reproduction Open
  • "The ethics of preconception expanded carrier screening in patients seeking assisted reproduction," 2020, Human Reproduction Open
  • "Effect of Exercise on the Resting Metabolic Rate and Substrate Utilization in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Results of a Pilot Study," 2022, Metabolites

Best Publications

  • Consensus on women's health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): The Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group

    Bart C.J.M. Fauser;Basil C. Tarlatzis;Robert W. Rebar;Richard S. Legro

  • ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria

    A.P. Ferraretti;A. La Marca;B.C.J.M. Fauser;B. Tarlatzis

  • Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results

    Grigoris F. Grimbizis;Michel Camus;Basil C. Tarlatzis;John N. Bontis

  • Fertility and ageing.

    D T Baird;J Collins;J Egozcue;L H Evers

  • Consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome

    B. C. Tarlatzis;B. C.J.M. Fauser;R. S. Legro;R. J. Norman

  • Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review

    B C Tarlatzis;L Zepiridis;G Grimbizis;J N Bontis

  • Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles

    C A Venetis;E M Kolibianakis;J K Bosdou;B C Tarlatzis

  • Neurodevelopmental fetal assessment using KANET scoring system in low and high risk pregnancies.

    Apostolos P. Athanasiadis;Themistoklis Mikos;George P. Tambakoudis;Theodoros D. Theodoridis

  • A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization and natural conception

    M. Bonduelle;U.-B. Wennerholm;A. Loft;B.C. Tarlatzis

  • Multiple gestation pregnancy

    Andre Van Steirteghem;Ingeborg Liebaers;R.g. Edwards;Dt. Baird

  • Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Kalliopi E. Loutradi;Efstratios M. Kolibianakis;Christos A. Venetis;Evangelos G. Papanikolaou

  • Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2009: results generated from European registers by ESHRE

    A.P. Ferraretti;V. Goossens;M. Kupka;S. Bhattacharya

  • Consensus on women's health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)

    B. C. J. M. Fauser;B. C. Tarlatzis;R. W. Rebar;R. S. Legro

  • The complex interaction between obesity, metabolic syndrome and reproductive axis: a narrative review.

    Konstantinos Michalakis;Gesthimani Mintziori;Athina Kaprara;Basil C. Tarlatzis

  • Adiponectin levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

    K A Toulis;D G Goulis;D Farmakiotis;N A Georgopoulos

  • Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Evangelos G. Papanikolaou;Efstratios M. Kolibianakis;Herman Tournaye;Christos A Venetis

  • Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHRE

    C. Calhaz-Jorge;C. de Geyter;M.S. Kupka;J. de Mouzon

  • How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization : a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Dimitra Kyrou;Efstratios M. Kolibianakis;Christos A. Venetis;Evangelos G. Papanikolaou

  • Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS): Long-term metabolic consequences.

    Panagiotis Anagnostis;Basil C. Tarlatzis;Robert P. Kauffman

  • Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

    Christos A Venetis;Christos A Venetis;Stamatis P Papadopoulos;Rudi Campo;Stephan Gordts

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Devroey
Paul Devroey Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Frederick Naftolin
Frederick Naftolin New York University
Bart C.J.M. Fauser
Bart C.J.M. Fauser Utrecht University
Herman Tournaye
Herman Tournaye Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Guido Pennings
Guido Pennings Ghent University
Klaus Diedrich
Klaus Diedrich University of Lübeck
Andres Negro-Vilar
Andres Negro-Vilar National Institutes of Health
Robert J. Norman
Robert J. Norman University of Adelaide
Neil J. MacLusky
Neil J. MacLusky University of Guelph

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking beyond an MD, there are several flexible online degree options for those interested in allied health and medical careers. For those with a non-nursing background looking to enter the nursing field, entry level msn programs online offer a direct and accelerated pathway to an advanced nursing degree. These programs are ideal for career-changers seeking a fast entry into nursing leadership roles.

If you prefer to start your nursing career quickly, consider adn programs. These Associate Degree in Nursing courses often have fewer prerequisites and can help you become a registered nurse in less time.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, medical coding and billing classes online with financial aid are widely available. These programs can lead to essential roles in managing health records and ensuring accurate billing, all while providing potential financial support.

Licensed practical nurses looking to advance their education can consider lpn to rn programs without teas test, which help you earn your RN without the additional testing requirements, making the path to career advancement more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Basil C. Tarlatzis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles