World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
6476
World Ranking
9331
National Ranking
3963

Daniel G. Aliaga publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Aliaga sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 155 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Daniel G. Aliaga D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Aliaga sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel G. Aliaga is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, focusing primarily on Environmental Science, Computer Science, and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Within these areas, Aliaga has contributed extensively across multiple subfields, including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, and Ocean Engineering.

Aliaga's published work covers a range of topics, reflecting interdisciplinary applications of computer science and environmental studies. The main themes in their research include:

  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Automated Road and Building Extraction
  • Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods

The scientist has authored numerous papers that contribute to understanding urban and environmental systems by leveraging computational models and data-driven approaches. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Modeling Large-Scale Heatwave by Incorporating Enhanced Urban Representation," 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Deep learning-based urban morphology for city-scale environmental modeling," 2023, PNAS Nexus
  • "GLObal Building heights for Urban Studies (UT-GLOBUS) for city- and street- scale urban simulations: Development and first applications," 2024, Scientific Data
  • "Impact of green roofs on heavy rainfall in tropical, coastal urban area," 2021, Environmental Research Letters
  • "Generative Building Feature Estimation From Satellite Images," 2023, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Many of Aliaga's collaborations have resulted in repeated partnerships, indicating ongoing research relationships with other experts. Frequent co-authors include Dev Niyogi, Pratiman Patel, He Liu, Sajad Jamshidi, and Raghu Nadimpalli.

The venues in which Aliaga publishes reflect a broad interdisciplinary engagement, including prominent outlets such as arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), The Visual Computer, Computer Graphics Forum, and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.

Best Publications

  • A Survey of Urban Reconstruction

    P. Musialski;P. Musialski;P. Wonka;P. Wonka;D. G. Aliaga;M. Wimmer

  • MMR: an interactive massive model rendering system using geometric and image-based acceleration

    Daniel Aliaga;Jon Cohen;Andrew Wilson;Eric Baker

  • Modelling the appearance and behaviour of urban spaces

    Carlos A. Vanegas;Daniel G. Aliaga;Peter Wonka;Pascal Müller

  • Urban sensing: Using smartphones for transportation mode classification

    Dongyoun Shin;Daniel G. Aliaga;Bige Tunçer;Stefan Müller Arisona

  • Building reconstruction using manhattan-world grammars

    Carlos A. Vanegas;Daniel G. Aliaga;Bedrich Benes

  • Interactive sketching of urban procedural models

    Gen Nishida;Ignacio Garcia-Dorado;Daniel G. Aliaga;Bedrich Benes

  • Inverse design of urban procedural models

    Carlos A. Vanegas;Ignacio Garcia-Dorado;Daniel G. Aliaga;Bedrich Benes

  • Style Grammars for Interactive Visualization of Architecture

    D.G. Aliaga;P.A. Rosen;D.R. Bekins

  • Plenoptic stitching: a scalable method for reconstructing 3D interactive walk throughs

    Daniel G. Aliaga;Ingrid Carlbom

  • Inverse Procedural Modeling by Automatic Generation of L‐systems

    O. Št'ava;B. Beneš;R. Měch;D. G. Aliaga

  • Interactive example-based urban layout synthesis

    Daniel G. Aliaga;Carlos A. Vanegas;Bedrich Benes

  • An object-oriented framework for the integration of interactive animation techniques

    Robert C. Zeleznik;D. Brookshire Conner;Matthias M. Wloka;Daniel G. Aliaga

  • Interactive design of urban spaces using geometrical and behavioral modeling

    Carlos A. Vanegas;Daniel G. Aliaga;Bedrich Benes;Paul A. Waddell

  • Sea of images

    D.G. Aliaga;T. Funkhouser;D. Yanovsky;I. Carlbom

  • Hybrid simplification: combining multi-resolution polygon and point rendering

    Jonathan D. Cohen;Daniel G. Aliaga;Weiqiang Zhang

  • Automatic image placement to provide a guaranteed frame rate

    Daniel G. Aliaga;Anselmo Lastra

  • Accurate catadioptric calibration for real-time pose estimation in room-size environments

    D.G. Aliaga

  • Architectural walkthroughs using portal textures

    Daniel G. Aliaga;Anselmo A. Lastra

  • Procedural Generation of Parcels in Urban Modeling

    Carlos A. Vanegas;Tom Kelly;Basil Weber;Jan Halatsch

  • Visualization of complex models using dynamic texture-based simplification

    Daniel G. Aliaga

Frequent Co-Authors

Bedrich Benes
Bedrich Benes Purdue University West Lafayette
Manuel M. Oliveira
Manuel M. Oliveira Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Dev Niyogi
Dev Niyogi The University of Texas at Austin
Thomas Funkhouser
Thomas Funkhouser Google (United States)
Peter Wonka
Peter Wonka King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Paul Waddell
Paul Waddell University of California, Berkeley
Luc Van Gool
Luc Van Gool Institute for Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence and Technology (INSAIT)
Fei Chen
Fei Chen National Center for Atmospheric Research
Rao S. Govindaraju
Rao S. Govindaraju Purdue University West Lafayette
Indrajeet Chaubey
Indrajeet Chaubey University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to many flexible educational options and diverse career paths. If you’re concerned about your academic history, there are online colleges that accept 2.0 GPA, giving more students the chance to pursue higher education.

Accelerated learning is also possible, especially through a 2-year computer science degree online. These programs let you gain industry-ready skills in less time, helping you enter the job market sooner.

Computer science overlaps with many fields. For example, technology is driving innovations in environmental science and engineering. If you’re curious about broader opportunities, you might ask, what can you do with an environmental science major? This degree can lead to roles in research, policy, sustainability, and technology-driven solutions.

For those interested in blending technical and environmental expertise, consider an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online. This path equips graduates to tackle global challenges with advanced STEM knowledge—all from the flexibility of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel G. Aliaga

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles