World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marinus J.C. Eijkemans

Marinus J.C. Eijkemans

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
99
Citations
41650
World Ranking
8509
National Ranking
335

Marinus J.C. Eijkemans publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marinus J.C. Eijkemans sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 385 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Marinus J.C. Eijkemans D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marinus J.C. Eijkemans sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marinus J.C. Eijkemans is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a specific focus on statistics, reproductive medicine, public health, cardiology, and pediatrics. Their published work spans 77 scientific publications largely concentrated in these areas.

Their research topics cover a range of subjects including:

  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Advanced causal inference techniques
  • Assisted reproductive technology and twin pregnancy
  • Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Statistical methods in clinical trials
  • Reproductive biology and fertility
  • Reproductive system and pregnancy

Several recent papers authored or co-authored by Eijkemans include:

  • Age-related natural fertility outcomes in women over 35 years: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis, 2020, published in Human Reproduction
  • An old friend who has overstayed their welcome: the ALSFRS-R total score as primary endpoint for ALS clinical trials, 2021, published in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
  • Artificial intelligence to enhance clinical value across the spectrum of cardiovascular healthcare, 2023, published in European Heart Journal
  • Endometrial scratching in women with one failed IVF/ICSI cycle-outcomes of a randomised controlled trial (SCRaTCH), 2020, published in Human Reproduction
  • A framework for assessing neuropsychiatric phenotypes by using smartphone-based location data, 2020, published in Translational Psychiatry

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Frank J. Broekmans
  • Ben W. Mol
  • Lawrence N. Kazembe
  • Tobias Chirwa
  • Madelon van Wely

Eijkemans' publications are commonly found in:

  • Human Reproduction
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
  • PLoS ONE
  • Neurology

Their interdisciplinary approach involves integrating statistical and probabilistic methods, clinical trial methodologies, and applications in reproductive and cardiovascular medicine. The diversity of venues and topics reflects their engagement with multiple facets of medical research with an emphasis on improving understanding and treatment in reproductive health and related areas.

Best Publications

  • Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis.

    Ewout W Steyerberg;Frank E Harrell;Gerard J.J.M Borsboom;M.J.C Eijkemans

  • A meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

    C.M. Boomsma;M.J.C. Eijkemans;E.G. Hughes;G.H.A. Visser

  • Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Measurements in Cardiovascular Risk Prediction A Meta-analysis

    Hester M. den Ruijter;Sanne A.E. Peters;Todd J. Anderson;Annie R. Britton

  • Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis : a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Marinus J.C. Eijkemans;Frank E. Harrell;J. Dik F. Habbema

  • Age at menopause as a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality

    Y.T van der Schouw;Y van der Graaf;E.W Steyerberg;M.J.C Eijkemans

  • Prognostic modeling with logistic regression analysis: in search of a sensible strategy in small data sets.

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Marinus J. C. Eijkemans;Frank E. Harrell;J. Dik F. Habbema

  • Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial

    Esther B. Baart;Elena Martini;Marinus J Eijkemans;Diane Van Opstal

  • Substantial effective sample sizes were required for external validation studies of predictive logistic regression models

    Yvonne Vergouwe;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Marinus J.C. Eijkemans;J. Dik F. Habbema

  • Obesity affects spontaneous pregnancy chances in subfertile, ovulatory women

    Jan Willem van der Steeg;Jan Willem van der Steeg;Jan Willem van der Steeg;Pieternel Steures;Pieternel Steures;Pieternel Steures;Marinus J.C. Eijkemans;J. Dik F. Habbema

  • Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Annemieke Kasius;Janine G. Smit;Helen L. Torrance;Marinus J.C. Eijkemans

  • Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve

    László F.J.M.M Bancsi;Frank J.M Broekmans;Marinus J.C Eijkemans;Frank H de Jong

  • Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: A study on sample size and shrinkage

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Gerard J. J. M. Borsboom;Hans C. van Houwelingen;Marinus J. C. Eijkemans

  • Stepwise selection in small data sets : A simulation study of bias in logistic regression analysis

    E. W. Steyerberg;M. J. C. Eijkemans;J. D. F. Habbema

  • PCOS according to the Rotterdam consensus criteria: change in prevalence among WHO‐II anovulation and association with metabolic factors

    F. J. Broekmans;E. A. H. Knauff;O. Valkenburg;J. S. Laven

  • Added value of ovarian reserve testing on patient characteristics in the prediction of ovarian response and ongoing pregnancy: an individual patient data approach

    Simone L Broer;Jeroen van Disseldorp;Jeroen van Disseldorp;Kimiko A Broeze;Kimiko A Broeze;Madeleine Dolleman;Madeleine Dolleman

  • Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria:

    Maarten van Smeden;Karel G.M. Moons;Joris A.H. de Groot;Gary S. Collins

  • A meta-analysis of outcomes of conventional IVF in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

    E.M.E.W. Heijnen;M.J.C. Eijkemans;E.G. Hughes;J.S.E. Laven

  • A mild treatment strategy for in-vitro fertilisation: a randomised non-inferiority trial

    Esther M. E. W. Heijnen;Esther M. E. W. Heijnen;Marinus J. C. Eijkemans;Marinus J. C. Eijkemans;Cora De Klerk;Suzanne Polinder

  • Comparison of inter- and intra-cycle variability of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle counts

    J. van Disseldorp;C.B. Lambalk;J. Kwee;C.W.N. Looman

  • Treatment of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia with Topical Imiquimod

    Manon van Seters;Marc van Beurden;Fiebo J.W. ten Kate;Ilse Beckmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Bart C.J.M. Fauser
Bart C.J.M. Fauser Utrecht University
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg Leiden University Medical Center
Frank J.M. Broekmans
Frank J.M. Broekmans Utrecht University
Joop S.E. Laven
Joop S.E. Laven Erasmus University Rotterdam
J. Dik F. Habbema
J. Dik F. Habbema Erasmus University Rotterdam
Nick S. Macklon
Nick S. Macklon University of Copenhagen
Ben Willem J. Mol
Ben Willem J. Mol Monash University
Régine P.M. Steegers-Theunissen
Régine P.M. Steegers-Theunissen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Frank H. de Jong
Frank H. de Jong Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ad J.J.C. Bogers
Ad J.J.C. Bogers Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine goes far beyond becoming a physician. There is an increasing demand for well-trained professionals across a variety of healthcare roles. Thankfully, online education has made it possible to pursue advanced degrees from anywhere, often at a lower cost. For those interested in healthcare leadership, consider researching the best online mha programs and the cheapest online master degree in healthcare administration. These programs suit students aiming for management positions in hospitals, clinics, and health organizations.

If your career goals are centered around advanced nursing practice, you might want to look at the cheapest dnp options available online. For those interested in pharmacy, pursuing an online pharmacist degree can lead to high-demand roles in both clinical and research settings.

These alternative pathways can offer flexibility, affordability, and access to fulfilling careers in the healthcare industry—including many non-physician roles essential to patient care and system operations.

Best Scientists Citing Marinus J.C. Eijkemans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles