World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Netherlands
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 140 1692 1568 59 58 805 74575

Wim C. J. Hop publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wim C. J. Hop between 1978 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wim C. J. Hop published across 46 years, from 1978 to 2023, averaging 17.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2007. 2 of the 812 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2007. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 5 publications 1983: 10 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 13 publications 1992: 24 publications 1993: 24 publications 1994: 22 publications 1995: 21 publications 1996: 19 publications 1997: 21 publications 1998: 38 publications 1999: 28 publications 2000: 46 publications 2001: 28 publications 2002: 28 publications 2003: 38 publications 2004: 32 publications 2005: 44 publications 2006: 29 publications 2007: 47 publications 2008: 46 publications 2009: 44 publications 2010: 32 publications 2011: 41 publications 2012: 41 publications 2013: 37 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications
1978 2023

812 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wim C. J. Hop: publications per year, 1978 to 2023
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 1
1980 3
1981 1
1982 5
1983 10
1984 3
1985 2
1986 1
1987 1
1988 4
1989 8
1990 7
1991 13
1992 24
1993 24
1994 22
1995 21
1996 19
1997 21
1998 38
1999 28
2000 46
2001 28
2002 28
2003 38
2004 32
2005 44
2006 29
2007 47
2008 46
2009 44
2010 32
2011 41
2012 41
2013 37
2014 11
2015 4
2016 2
2017 2
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 2
Total 812
Download as CSV

Wim C. J. Hop publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim C. J. Hop sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 801–820 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 805 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204 805
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Wim C. J. Hop D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim C. J. Hop sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 140–141 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 140 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134 140
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Wim C. J. Hop is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research expertise lies within the broader field of Medicine, with a focus on surgical practices and related medical disciplines.

Their work spans several subfields, including Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Internal Medicine. This multidisciplinary involvement reflects an engagement with complex clinical problems across multiple areas of patient care.

Key topics frequently explored in their research include:

  • Hernia repair and management
  • Appendicitis diagnosis and management
  • Pelvic and acetabular injuries
  • Esophageal cancer research and treatment
  • Esophageal and gastrointestinal pathology
  • Gastric cancer management and outcomes
  • Acute myocardial infarction research

Wim C. J. Hop has published articles in several peer-reviewed journals, including:

  • EClinicalMedicine
  • Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Recent publications include the following:

  • "Twelve-year outcomes of watchful waiting versus surgery of mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic inguinal hernia in men aged 50 years and older: a randomised controlled trial," 2023, EClinicalMedicine
  • "A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi-mechanical with hand-sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE-study)," 2020, Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • "Are troponin T levels in women with pre-eclampsia related to development of pulmonary oedema?", 2023, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, with notable co-authors including Sarah van Egmond, Jort Heijne, Joost van Rosmalen, Barry de Goede, and A. R. Wijsmuller. Each co-author has contributed to multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

    Veldkamp R;Kuhry E;Hop Wc;Jeekel J

  • A Comparison of Suture Repair with Mesh Repair for Incisional Hernia

    Luijendijk Rw;Hop Wc;van den Tol Mp;de Lange Dc

  • Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Suture Versus Mesh Repair of Incisional Hernia

    Jacobus W.A. Burger;Roland W. Luijendijk;Wim C.J. Hop;Jens A. Halm

  • Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial

    Martijn H. G. M. van der Pas;Eva Haglind;Miguel A. Cuesta;Alois Fürst

  • Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

    Mark Buunen;Ruben Veldkamp;Wim C J Hop

  • Prognostic value of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood

    Jacques Jm van Dongen;Taku Seriu;E Renate Panzer-Grümayer;Andrea Biondi

  • Immunophenotyping of blood lymphocytes in childhood: Reference values for lymphocyte subpopulations

    W.Marieke Comans-Bitter;Ronald de Groot;René van den Beemd;Herman J. Neijens

  • Blood Transfusions and Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer

    O R Busch;W C Hop;M A Hoynck van Papendrecht;R L Marquet

  • Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis.

    H. Jacob Bonjer;H. Jacob Bonjer;Wim C. J. Hop;Heidi Nelson;Daniel J. Sargent

  • An immunohistochemical procedure to detect patients with paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma with germline SDHB, SDHC, or SDHD gene mutations: a retrospective and prospective analysis.

    Francien H van Nederveen;José Gaal;Judith Favier;Esther Korpershoek

  • Subclinical hepatic encephalopathy impairs daily functioning

    Michael Groeneweg;Juan C. Quero;Ilone De Bruijn;Ieneke J.C. Hartmann

  • Controlled clinical trial of selective decontamination for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis.

    Ernest J. T. Luiten;Wim C. J. Hop;Johan F. Lange;Hajo A. Bruining

  • The Natural Course of Infantile Pompe’s Disease: 20 Original Cases Compared With 133 Cases From the Literature

    Hannerieke M. P. van den Hout;Wim Hop;Otto P. van Diggelen;Jan A. M. Smeitink

  • Survival and prognostic indicators in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive cirrhosis of the liver

    Felix E. De Jongh;Harry L.A. Janssen;Robert A. De Man;Wim C.J. Hop

  • Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors.

    Khe T. C. Tran;Hans G. Smeenk;Casper H. J. van Eijck;Geert Kazemier

  • Titrating steroids on exhaled nitric oxide in children with asthma: a randomized controlled trial.

    Mariëlle W. Pijnenburg;E. Marije Bakker;Wim C. Hop;Johan C. De Jongste

  • Prospective study on the relationship between infections and multiple sclerosis exacerbations

    D. Buljevac;H. Z. Flach;W. C. J. Hop;D. Hijdra

  • Hybrid genotypes in the pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans

    Teun Boekhout;Bart Theelen;Mara Diaz;Jack W. Fell

  • Long-Term Intravenous Treatment of Pompe Disease With Recombinant Human -Glucosidase From Milk

    M. Christa;B. Loonen;Arnold G. Vulto;Adri Cromme-Dijkhuis

  • Clinical manifestation and natural course of late-onset Pompe's disease in 54 Dutch patients

    M. L. C. Hagemans;L. P. F. Winkel;P. A. Van Doorn;W. J. C. Hop

Frequent Co-Authors

Johannes Jeekel
Johannes Jeekel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dick Tibboel
Dick Tibboel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Rob Pieters
Rob Pieters Princess Máxima Center
Hugo W. Tilanus
Hugo W. Tilanus Erasmus University Rotterdam
Solko W. Schalm
Solko W. Schalm Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan N. M. IJzermans
Jan N. M. IJzermans Erasmus University Rotterdam
Eric A.P. Steegers
Eric A.P. Steegers Erasmus University Rotterdam
P.A. van Doorn
P.A. van Doorn Erasmus University Rotterdam
Peter D. Siersema
Peter D. Siersema Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a medical career goes beyond traditional MD programs. Today, students have access to a range of online health degrees and certifications that open alternative pathways in healthcare. These options are ideal for those seeking greater flexibility, affordability, or who wish to specialize in areas outside direct patient care.

For advanced nursing careers, check out the most affordable online DNP programs. Pharmacists can explore pharm d online programs, offering the chance to earn a doctorate in pharmacy from home.

Beyond clinical roles, healthcare relies on skilled professionals in informatics and administration. Explore health informatics degrees to become an expert in managing patient data. Or, if you're looking for a faster entry point, consider the cheapest medical billing and coding online courses for certification in this in-demand field.

Each pathway offers unique opportunities and meets different career goals within the vast landscape of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Wim C. J. Hop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles