World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
26263
World Ranking
16554
National Ranking
627

Hugo W. Tilanus publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugo W. Tilanus sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 280 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Hugo W. Tilanus D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugo W. Tilanus sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hugo W. Tilanus is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine with a focus on Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine as subfields.

The scientist's main topics of work include:

  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Hugo W. Tilanus has contributed to multiple publications with notable papers such as:

  • "Ten-Year Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: The Randomized Controlled CROSS Trial" (2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology)
  • "A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi-mechanical with hand-sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE-study)" (2020, Journal of Surgical Oncology)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • J. Jan B. van Lanschot
  • Ben M. Eyck
  • Maarten C.C.M. Hulshof
  • Berend J. van der Wilk
  • Joël Shapiro

Frequently publishing in venues such as:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Journal of Surgical Oncology

Best Publications

  • Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial

    Joel Shapiro;J Jan B van Lanschot;Maarten C C M Hulshof;Pieter van Hagen

  • Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

    Jan B F Hulscher;Johanna W van Sandick;Angela G E M de Boer;Bas P L Wijnhoven

  • Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients

    J.J. Bonenkamp;I. Songun;K. Welvaart;C.J.H. van de Velde

  • Extended Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer: Who May Benefit? Final Results of the Randomized Dutch Gastric Cancer Group Trial

    H.H. Hartgrink;C.J.H. van de Velde;H. Putter;J.J. Bonenkamp

  • Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial.

    Jikke M. T. Omloo;Sjoerd M. Lagarde;Jan B. F. Hulscher;Johannes B. Reitsma

  • Exosome-mediated transmission of hepatitis C virus between human hepatoma Huh7.5 cells

    Vedashree Ramakrishnaiah;Christine Thumann;Isabel Fofana;Francois Habersetzer

  • Single-dose brachytherapy versus metal stent placement for the palliation of dysphagia from oesophageal cancer: multicentre randomised trial

    Marjolein Y V Homs;Ewout W Steyerberg;Wilhelmina M H Eijkenboom;Hugo W Tilanus

  • Ten-Year Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: The Randomized Controlled CROSS Trial

    Ben M Eyck;J Jan B van Lanschot;J Jan B van Lanschot;Maarten C C M Hulshof;Berend J van der Wilk

  • Outcome of surgical treatment for early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction

    Marinke Westerterp;Linetta B. Koppert;Christianne J. Buskens;Hugo W. Tilanus

  • Risk factors for the development of an adenocarcinoma in columnar‐lined (Barrett) esophagus

    Marian B. E. Menke-Pluymers;Wim C. J. Hop;Jan Dees;Mark van Blankenstein

  • Coated self-expanding metal stents versus latex prostheses for esophagogastric cancer with special reference to prior radiation and chemotherapy: a controlled, prospective study

    Peter D. Siersema;Wim C.J. Hop;Jan Dees;Hugo W. Tilanus

  • Indications and Long-term Outcome of Treatment for Benign Hepatic Tumors: A Critical Appraisal

    Türkan Terkivatan;Johannes H. W. de Wilt;Robert A. de Man;Rick R. van Rijn

  • Ingestion of acid and alkaline agents: outcome and prognostic value of early upper endoscopy ☆

    Jan-Werner Poley;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Ernst J. Kuipers;Jan Dees

  • Surgical Mortality in Patients With Esophageal Cancer: Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Score

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Bridget A. Neville;Linetta B. Koppert;Valery E.P.P. Lemmens

  • Endoscopic ablation therapy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: a review.

    Jolanda van den Boogert;Richard van Hillegersberg;Peter D Siersema;Ron W.F de Bruin

  • Reduced expression of the cadherin–catenin complex in oesophageal adenocarcinoma correlates with poor prognosis

    K. K. Krishnadath;H. W. Tilanus;M. Van Blankenstein;W. C. J. Hop

  • An evaluation of prognostic factors and tumor staging of resected carcinoma of the esophagus

    Bas P. L. Wijnhoven;Khe T. C. Tran;Adrian Esterman;David I. Watson

  • Long-Term Esophageal Cancer Risk in Patients With Primary Achalasia: A Prospective Study

    Ivonne Leeuwenburgh;Pieter Scholten;Joyce Alderliesten;Hugo Tilanus

  • Hepatocyte-derived microRNAs as serum biomarkers of hepatic injury and rejection after liver transplantation.

    Waqar R. R. Farid;Qiuwei Pan;Adriaan J. P. van der Meer;Petra E. de Ruiter

  • Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery versus Surgery Alone in Patients with Resectable Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long-term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

    Jurjen J. Boonstra;Tjebbe C. Kok;Bas P. L. Wijnhoven;Mark van Heijl

Frequent Co-Authors

Luc J. W. van der Laan
Luc J. W. van der Laan Erasmus University Rotterdam
Peter D. Siersema
Peter D. Siersema Radboud University
Wim C. J. Hop
Wim C. J. Hop Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ernst J. Kuipers
Ernst J. Kuipers Nanyang Technological University
Jan N. M. IJzermans
Jan N. M. IJzermans Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg Leiden University Medical Center
Harry L.A. Janssen
Harry L.A. Janssen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Fiebo J.W. ten Kate
Fiebo J.W. ten Kate Utrecht University
Olivier R. Busch
Olivier R. Busch University of Amsterdam
Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen
Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen Catharina Ziekenhuis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine but seeking alternative or flexible career routes, there are several related online degrees that can open doors in healthcare. Nursing is a rewarding and in-demand field with many accessible academic pathways available online.

Aspiring nurses looking to advance their education may consider online nursing phd programs to gain expertise and leadership roles in clinical or academic settings. Meanwhile, those who already have an RN qualification but want to earn a bachelor’s degree can explore the cheapest rn to bsn program options for cost-effective advancement.

If you hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, transitioning into the profession is still possible, thanks to non nursing bachelor's to msn online pathways—offering a fast track to a master’s degree in nursing. Those just beginning their nursing journey should consider accredited online adn programs, which are often more accessible and convenient for first-time students.

Each of these pathways provides flexibility and diverse entry points for those committed to making a difference in healthcare—without the traditional constraints of on-campus programs.

Best Scientists Citing Hugo W. Tilanus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles