World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
China
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
90
Citations
38697
World Ranking
580
National Ranking
59

John C. Moore publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Moore sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 480 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

John C. Moore D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Moore sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in China Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in China Leader Award

Overview

John C. Moore is a researcher affiliated with Beijing Normal University in China. Their work spans key areas in environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, contributing to several subfields such as environmental engineering, ecology, global and planetary change, sociology and political science, and nature and landscape conservation.

The main topics of John C. Moore's research include:

  • Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

Their recent publications cover diverse themes reflecting these interests:

  • "The productivity-stability trade-off in global food systems," 2024, published in Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • "Mysterious Mycorrhizae? A Field Trip & Classroom Experiment to Demystify the Symbioses Formed between Plants & Fungi," 2021, published by UNC Libraries
  • "Global Change Asymmetrically Rewires Ecosystems," 2025, published in Ecology Letters

Repeated collaborations have been noted with the following coauthors:

  • Kevin S. McCann
  • Bailey C. McMeans
  • Ian Donohue
  • Carling Bieg
  • Charlotte Ward

John C. Moore's research has frequently appeared in these publication venues:

  • Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • UNC Libraries
  • Ecology Letters

The diverse scope of research topics and collaborative networks illustrate a multidisciplinary approach to the study of ecological systems and environmental challenges. The focus on both theoretical and applied aspects, such as symbiotic relationships in mycorrhizae and global changes affecting ecosystems, is indicative of a broad academic interest aligned with current scientific priorities in sustainability and ecosystem resilience.

Best Publications

  • Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series

    A. Grinsted;J. C. Moore;S. Jevrejeva

  • Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity

    John C. Moore;Eric L. Berlow;David C. Coleman;Quan Dong

  • A meta-analysis of context-dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi

    Jason D. Hoeksema;V. Bala Chaudhary;Catherine A. Gehring;Nancy Collins Johnson

  • Structural asymmetry and the stability of diverse food webs

    Neil Rooney;Kevin McCann;Gabriel Gellner;John C. Moore

  • Energetics, Patterns of Interaction Strengths, and Stability in Real Ecosystems

    Peter C. De Ruiter;Anje Margriet Neutel;John C. Moore

  • The detrital food web in a shortgrass prairie

    H. W. Hunt;D. C. Coleman;E. R. Ingham;R. E. Ingham

  • Reconstructing sea level from paleo and projected temperatures 200 to 2100 ad

    Aslak Grinsted;Aslak Grinsted;John C. Moore;John C. Moore;Svetlana Jevrejeva

  • Arthropod regulation of micro- and mesobiota in below-ground detrital food webs

    J. C. Moore;D. E. Walter;H. W. Hunt

  • Recent Global Sea Level Acceleration Started Over 200 Years Ago

    Svetlana Jevrejeva;J. Moore;J. Moore;A. Grinsted;P. Woodworth

  • Home-field advantage accelerates leaf litter decomposition in forests

    Edward Ayres;Heidi Steltzer;Breana L. Simmons;Rodney T. Simpson

  • Dependence of the evolution of carbon dynamics in the northern permafrost region on the trajectory of climate change.

    A. David McGuire;David M. Lawrence;Charles Koven;Joy S. Clein

  • Influence of the Arctic Oscillation and El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on ice conditions in the Baltic Sea: The wavelet approach

    S. Jevrejeva;J. C. Moore;A. Grinsted

  • Long-term warming restructures Arctic tundra without changing net soil carbon storage

    Seeta A. Sistla;John C. Moore;Rodney T. Simpson;Laura Gough

  • Nonlinear trends and multiyear cycles in sea level records

    Svetlana Jevrejeva;Aslak Grinsted;Aslak Grinsted;John C. Moore;S. Holgate

  • Resource compartmentation and the stability of real ecosystems

    John C. Moore;H. William Hunt

  • TOP-DOWN IS BOTTOM-UP: DOES PREDATION IN THE RHIZOSPHERE REGULATE ABOVEGROUND DYNAMICS?

    John C. Moore;Kevin McCann;Heikki Setälä;Peter C. De Ruiter

  • Interactions Underground: Soil biodiversity, mutualism, and ecosystem processes

    Diana H. Wall;John C. Moore

  • Simulation of nitrogen mineralization in the belowground food webs of two winter wheat fields.

    P.C. de Ruiter;J.C. Moore;K.B. Zwart;L.A. Bouwman

  • The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

    Simone Tilmes;John Fasullo;Jean-Francois Lamarque;Daniel R. Marsh

  • Electrical conductivity measurements from the GISP2 and GRIP Greenland ice cores

    K. C. Taylor;C. U. Hammer;R. B. Alley;H. B. Clausen

  • Recent advances in carbon emissions reduction: policies, technologies, monitoring, assessment and modeling

    Donald Huisingh;Zhihua Zhang;John C. Moore;Qi Qiao

  • Reconstructing sea level from paleo and projected temperatures 200 to 2100AD

    Aslak Grinsted;Aslak Grinsted;J Moore;S Jevrejeva

Frequent Co-Authors

Aslak Grinsted
Aslak Grinsted University of Copenhagen
Svetlana Jevrejeva
Svetlana Jevrejeva National Oceanography Centre
Duoying Ji
Duoying Ji Beijing Normal University
Thomas Zwinger
Thomas Zwinger CSC - IT Center for Science (Finland)
Veijo A. Pohjola
Veijo A. Pohjola Uppsala University
Annette Rinke
Annette Rinke Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Elisabeth Isaksson
Elisabeth Isaksson Norwegian Polar Institute
Peter C. de Ruiter
Peter C. de Ruiter University of Amsterdam
Shingo Watanabe
Shingo Watanabe Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
Ben Kravitz
Ben Kravitz Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many students look for affordable options, and programs like the cheapest online general studies degree programs provide budget-friendly pathways to higher education without compromising quality.

If you prefer a less intensive course load, there are also options categorized as easy bachelor degrees. These programs can help balance studies with work or personal commitments while still delivering valuable knowledge relevant to environmental fields.

Specialized areas such as geology play a significant role in environmental science careers. Pursuing an online geology degree offers insight into earth processes, natural resources, and sustainability—all critical for understanding environmental challenges.

Another growing field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which is essential for data analysis and environmental planning. Considering the best gis graduate programs can open doors to careers in spatial data management, conservation, and urban development.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles