World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
3163
World Ranking
9493
National Ranking
3402

Nicholas P. Webb publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas P. Webb sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 79 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Nicholas P. Webb D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas P. Webb sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicholas P. Webb is affiliated with New Mexico State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, earth and planetary sciences, and agricultural and biological sciences. Within these broad areas, specific subfields of study include earth-surface processes, global and planetary change, soil science, ecology, and atmospheric science.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, particularly aeolian processes and effects, soil erosion and sediment transport, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, rangeland and wildlife management, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, and atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics.

Webb has authored numerous papers published across various reputable venues. Among recent publications are:

  • "Vegetation Canopy Gap Size and Height: Critical Indicators for Wind Erosion Monitoring and Management" (2021, Rangeland Ecology & Management)
  • "Critical standing crop residue amounts for wind erosion control in the inland Pacific Northwest, USA" (2020, CATENA)
  • "A North American dust emission climatology (2001-2020) calibrated to dust point sources from satellite observations" (2021, Aeolian Research)
  • "Satellites reveal Earth's seasonally shifting dust emission sources" (2023, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • "Provoking a Cultural Shift in Data Quality" (2021, BioScience)

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Nicholas P. Webb include Brandon L. Edwards, Sarah E. McCord, Justin W. Van Zee, Michael C. Duniway, and Emily Kachergis. These collaborations correspond to substantial co-authorship counts, indicating ongoing research partnerships.

Their publications commonly appear in journals such as Aeolian Research, Rangeland Ecology & Management, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, The Science of The Total Environment, and Rangelands. Notably, Aeolian Research and Rangeland Ecology & Management are prominent venues for their work.

Best Publications

  • Land degradation and climate change: building climate resilience in agriculture

    Nicholas P Webb;Nadine A Marshall;Lindsay C Stringer;Mark S Reed

  • Soil erodibility dynamics and its representation for wind erosion and dust emission models

    Nicholas P. Webb;Craig L. Strong

  • Minimising soil organic carbon erosion by wind is critical for land degradation neutrality

    Adrian Chappell;Nicholas P. Webb;John F. Leys;Cathleen M. Waters

  • AUSLEM (AUStralian Land Erodibility Model): A tool for identifying wind erosion hazard in Australia

    Nicholas P. Webb;Nicholas P. Webb;Hamish A. McGowan;Hamish A. McGowan;Stuart R. Phinn;Grant Harvey McTainsh;Grant Harvey McTainsh

  • Social vulnerability to climate change in primary producers: A typology approach

    N.A. Marshall;C.J. Stokes;N.P. Webb;P.A. Marshall

  • The Grassland–Shrubland Regime Shift in the Southwestern United States: Misconceptions and Their Implications for Management

    Brandon T. Bestelmeyer;Debra P.C. Peters;Steven R. Archer;Dawn M. Browning

  • Quantifying Anthropogenic Dust Emissions

    Nicholas P. Webb;Caroline Pierre

  • Using albedo to reform wind erosion modelling, mapping and monitoring

    Adrian Chappell;Nicholas P. Webb

  • The significance of carbon-enriched dust for global carbon accounting

    Nicholas P. Webb;Nicholas P. Webb;Adrian Chappell;Craig L. Strong;Samuel K. Marx

  • Indicators and benchmarks for wind erosion monitoring, assessment and management

    Nicholas P. Webb;Emily Kachergis;Scott W. Miller;Scott W. Miller;Sarah E. McCord

  • Improving ground cover monitoring for wind erosion assessment using MODIS BRDF parameters

    Adrian Chappell;Nicholas P. Webb;Juan Pablo Guerschman;Juan Pablo Guerschman;Dean T. Thomas

  • Grazing impacts on the susceptibility of rangelands to wind erosion: The effects of stocking rate, stocking strategy and land condition

    Hélène Aubault;Nicholas P. Webb;Craig L. Strong;Grant H. McTainsh

  • Soil organic carbon dust emission: an omitted global source of atmospheric CO2.

    Adrian Chappell;Nicholas P. Webb;Harry J. Butler;Craig L. Strong

  • Approaches to modelling land erodibility by wind

    Nicholas P. Webb;Hamish A. McGowan

  • The National Wind Erosion Research Network: Building a standardized long-term data resource for aeolian research, modeling and land management

    Nicholas P. Webb;Jeffrey E. Herrick;Justin W. Van Zee;Ericha M. Courtright

  • Vegetation in Drylands: Effects on Wind Flow and Aeolian Sediment Transport

    Jerome R. Mayaud;Nicholas P. Webb

  • The effect of roughness elements on wind erosion: The importance of surface shear stress distribution

    Nicholas P. Webb;Gregory S. Okin;Shannon Brown

  • Ecological site‐based assessments of wind and water erosion: informing accelerated soil erosion management in rangelands.

    Nicholas P. Webb;Jeffrey E. Herrick;Michael C. Duniway

  • Vegetation Canopy Gap Size and Height: Critical Indicators for Wind Erosion Monitoring and Management

    Nicholas P. Webb;Sarah E. McCord;Brandon L. Edwards;Jeffrey E. Herrick

  • Dust emission from crusted surfaces: Insights from field measurements and modelling

    Martina Klose;Thomas E. Gill;Vicken Etyemezian;George Nikolich

  • Threshold wind velocity dynamics as a driver of aeolian sediment mass flux

    Nicholas P. Webb;Magda S. Galloza;Ted M. Zobeck;Jeffrey E. Herrick

  • The Land‐Potential Knowledge System (LandPKS): mobile apps and collaboration for optimizing climate change investments

    Jeffrey E. Herrick;Adam Beh;Edmundo Barrios;Ioana Bouvier

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrian Chappell
Adrian Chappell Cardiff University
Jeffrey E. Herrick
Jeffrey E. Herrick New Mexico State University
Grant Harvey McTainsh
Grant Harvey McTainsh Griffith University
Hamish A. McGowan
Hamish A. McGowan University of Queensland
Gregory S. Okin
Gregory S. Okin University of California, Los Angeles
Stuart R. Phinn
Stuart R. Phinn University of Queensland
Thomas E. Gill
Thomas E. Gill The University of Texas at El Paso
Nadine Marshall
Nadine Marshall James Cook University
Béatrice Marticorena
Béatrice Marticorena Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
David R. Huggins
David R. Huggins Washington State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related fields can open up diverse career opportunities. Degrees such as a best online bachelor degree in sociology offer valuable insights into social behaviors and human-environment interactions, which are crucial for effective environmental policy and community engagement.

Public administration skills are also essential in managing environmental programs and initiatives. Pursuing one of the best online masters in public administration can prepare professionals for leadership roles within government agencies and NGOs focused on sustainability and conservation.

For educators seeking to enhance their expertise, online programs such as edd no dissertation programs offer flexible paths to advanced degrees without the traditional dissertation requirement, speeding up the process to apply research in environmental education settings.

Additionally, those interested in advanced leadership roles should consider accredited eds to edd programs, which provide a structured progression from a specialist degree to a doctorate, equipping professionals with both research and practical skills to drive environmental progress.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas P. Webb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles