World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen

Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
24874
World Ranking
17485
National Ranking
659

Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 385 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen is affiliated with Catharina Ziekenhuis in the Netherlands. Their research primarily concentrates on medical fields, with a significant focus on surgery and oncology in relation to gastrointestinal diseases.

Their main fields of study include Medicine, with substantial contributions to Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Oncology. Subfields extend to Cancer Research and Gastroenterology, highlighting a multidisciplinary approach within clinical and surgical oncology.

The scientist's key research topics cover:

  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Nieuwenhuijzen's frequent publication venues reflect specialization in surgical oncology and related disciplines. The most common journals include:

  • European Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Diseases of the Esophagus
  • British Journal of Surgery
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Annals of Surgery

Collaborations with other researchers are evident, with frequent coauthors being:

  • Camiel Rosman
  • Misha Luyer
  • Ewout A. Kouwenhoven
  • Suzanne S. Gisbertz
  • Sjoerd M. Lagarde

Their recent published papers illustrate ongoing research interests and clinical trial involvement. Selected recent works include:

  • Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial, 2020, The Lancet Oncology
  • Ten-Year Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: The Randomized Controlled CROSS Trial, 2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Radiotherapy or Surgery of the Axilla After a Positive Sentinel Node in Breast Cancer: 10-Year Results of the Randomized Controlled EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial, 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial, 2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer, 2021, JAMA Surgery

Best Publications

  • Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial

    Joel Shapiro;J Jan B van Lanschot;Maarten C C M Hulshof;Pieter van Hagen

  • Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial

    Mila Donker;Geertjan van Tienhoven;Marieke E Straver;Philip Meijnen

  • Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

    Renu R Bahadoer;Esmée A Dijkstra;Boudewijn van Etten;Corrie A M Marijnen;Corrie A M Marijnen

  • Cytokine patterns in patients after major vascular surgery, hemorrhagic shock, and severe blunt trauma. Relation with subsequent adult respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure.

    R.M.H. Roumen;T. Hendriks;J. van der Ven-Jongekrijg;G.A. Nieuwenhuijzen

  • Ten-Year Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: The Randomized Controlled CROSS Trial

    Ben M Eyck;J Jan B van Lanschot;J Jan B van Lanschot;Maarten C C M Hulshof;Berend J van der Wilk

  • Comparison of morbidity between axillary lymph node dissection and sentinel node biopsy

    M.P. Schijven;A.J.J.M. Vingerhoets;H.J.T. Rutten;G.A.P. Nieuwenhuijzen

  • Less extensive treatment and inferior prognosis for breast cancer patient with comorbidity: a population-based study

    W.J. Louwman;M.L.G. Janssen-Heijnen;S. Houterman;A.C. Voogd

  • Oncological outcome of malignant colonic obstruction in the Dutch Stent-In 2 trial

    D. A. M. Sloothaak;M. W. van den Berg;M. G. W. Dijkgraaf;P. Fockens

  • Detection of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer (preSANO): a prospective multicentre, diagnostic cohort study.

    Bo Jan Noordman;Manon C W Spaander;Roelf Valkema;Bas P L Wijnhoven

  • Radical resection after IORT-containing multimodality treatment is the most important determinant for outcome in patients treated for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

    Raphaëla C. Dresen;Marleen J. Gosens;Hendrik Martijn;Grard A. Nieuwenhuijzen

  • Reduction of Postoperative Ileus by Early Enteral Nutrition in Patients Undergoing Major Rectal Surgery Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Petra G. Boelens;Fanny F. B. M. Heesakkers;Misha D. P. Luyer;Kevin W. Y. van Barneveld

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial

    Charlotte S Loozen;Hjalmar C van Santvoort;Peter van Duijvendijk;Marc Gh Besselink

  • Learning Curve and Associated Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

    Frans van Workum;Marianne H. B. C. Stenstra;Gijs H. K. Berkelmans;Annelijn E. Slaman

  • Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus active surveillance for oesophageal cancer: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial

    Bo Jan Noordman;Bas P. L. Wijnhoven;Sjoerd M. Lagarde;Jurjen J. Boonstra

  • Defining Benchmarks for Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Multicenter Analysis of Total Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Low Risk Patients.

    Henner M. Schmidt;Susanne S. Gisbertz;Johnny Moons;Ioannis Rouvelas

  • Circumferential Margin Involvement Is the Crucial Prognostic Factor after Multimodality Treatment in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma

    Marleen J.E.M. Gosens;René A. Klaassen;Ivonne Tan-Go;Harm J.T. Rutten

  • Safety and effectiveness of SGM-101, a fluorescent antibody targeting carcinoembryonic antigen, for intraoperative detection of colorectal cancer: a dose-escalation pilot study.

    Leonora S F Boogerd;Charlotte E S Hoogstins;Dennis P Schaap;Miranda Kusters

  • Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

    Arjen van der Veen;Hylke J F Brenkman;Maarten F J Seesing;Leonie Haverkamp

  • Increased incidence and survival for oesophageal cancer but not for gastric cardia cancer in the Netherlands

    Johan L. Dikken;Johan L. Dikken;Valery E. Lemmens;Michel W.J.M. Wouters;Bas P. Wijnhoven

  • Clinical management of women with metastatic breast cancer: a descriptive study according to age group.

    Klaartje Manders;Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse;Geert-Jan Creemers;Gerard Vreugdenhil

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard van Hillegersberg
Richard van Hillegersberg Utrecht University
Peter D. Siersema
Peter D. Siersema Radboud University
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg Leiden University Medical Center
Cornelis J.H. van de Velde
Cornelis J.H. van de Velde Leiden University Medical Center
Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh
Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh Maastricht University
Hugo W. Tilanus
Hugo W. Tilanus Erasmus University Rotterdam
Cornelis J. A. Punt
Cornelis J. A. Punt University of Amsterdam
Olivier R. Busch
Olivier R. Busch University of Amsterdam
Jan Willem Coebergh
Jan Willem Coebergh Erasmus University Rotterdam
Henk M.W. Verheul
Henk M.W. Verheul Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open additional pathways in healthcare. Many students interested in Medicine pursue nursing qualifications online, drawn by flexibility and affordability. When considering how much is online nursing school, it’s essential to compare tuition, accreditation, and financial aid to find the best fit.

Advancing in your career may involve earning an online nursing doctorate. These programs are designed for working professionals seeking leadership or academic roles. Many institutions also offer cheap rn to bsn online programs that allow registered nurses to complete their bachelor's degree affordably and at their own pace.

Aspiring nurses without a nursing background can fast-track healthcare careers through non nursing bachelor's to msn online programs. These pathways help diverse students transition into the nursing field quickly, offering both flexibility and strong career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles