World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 108 5970 5611 226 221 512 46179

Jan Willem Coebergh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Willem Coebergh between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Willem Coebergh published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 13 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2010. 1 of the 518 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2010. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 21 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 31 publications 2006: 36 publications 2007: 36 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 38 publications 2010: 41 publications 2011: 33 publications 2012: 31 publications 2013: 32 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1986 2025

518 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan Willem Coebergh: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 3
1992 3
1993 4
1994 8
1995 7
1996 11
1997 9
1998 14
1999 21
2000 8
2001 18
2002 7
2003 22
2004 19
2005 31
2006 36
2007 36
2008 28
2009 38
2010 41
2011 33
2012 31
2013 32
2014 18
2015 13
2016 5
2017 6
2018 2
2019 2
2020 2
2021 1
2022 2
2023 1
2024 0
2025 1
Total 518
Download as CSV

Jan Willem Coebergh publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Willem Coebergh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 512 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 512
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan Willem Coebergh D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Willem Coebergh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 108
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jan Willem Coebergh is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with extensive research spanning related subfields such as Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Neurology, Economics and Econometrics, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's research focuses on topics including Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research, Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment, Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer, Family Support in Illness, Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare, and the Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism.

Recent publications by Jan Willem Coebergh emphasize cancer epidemiology and treatment outcomes in pediatric and young adolescent populations. Selected papers include:

  • Significant improvement in survival of advanced stage childhood and young adolescent cancer in the Netherlands since the 1990s (2021) in European Journal of Cancer
  • Progress against childhood and adolescent acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in the Netherlands, 1990-2015 (2020) in Leukemia
  • Increasing incidence of cancer and stage migration towards advanced disease in children and young adolescents in the Netherlands, 1990-2017 (2020) in European Journal of Cancer
  • Temporal lobe perceptual predictions for speech are instantiated in motor cortex and reconciled by inferior frontal cortex (2023) in Cell Reports
  • Improved survival for adolescents and young adults with Hodgkin lymphoma and continued high survival for children in the Netherlands: a population-based study during 1990-2015 (2020) in British Journal of Haematology

Jan Willem Coebergh frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Ardine Reedijk
  • Leontien C.M. Kremer
  • Rob Pieters
  • Henrike E. Karim-Kos
  • Olaf Ortmann

Their work appears predominantly in journals such as:

  • European Journal of Cancer
  • Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
  • Leukemia
  • Cell Reports
  • British Journal of Haematology

Best Publications

  • Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012

    J. Ferlay;Eva Steliarova-Foucher;Joannie Lortet-Tieulent;Sonia Rosso

  • Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995–99: results of the EUROCARE-4 study

    Franco Berrino;Roberta De Angelis;Milena Sant;Stefano Rosso

  • Recent trends of cancer in Europe: a combined approach of incidence, survival and mortality for 17 cancer sites since the 1990s.

    Henrike E. Karim-Kos;Esther de Vries;Isabelle Soerjomataram;Valery Lemmens

  • Geographical patterns and time trends of cancer incidence and survival among children and adolescents in Europe since the 1970s (the ACCIS project): an epidemiological study

    Eva Steliarova-Foucher;Charles Stiller;Peter Kaatsch;Franco Berrino

  • Quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors: A systematic review

    Floortje Mols;Ad J.J.M. Vingerhoets;Jan Willem Coebergh;Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse

  • An overview of prognostic factors for long-term survivors of breast cancer

    Isabelle Soerjomataram;Marieke W. J. Louwman;Jacques G. Ribot;Jan A. Roukema

  • Recent trends in incidence of five common cancers in 26 European countries since 1988: Analysis of the European Cancer Observatory.

    Melina Arnold;Henrike E. Karim-Kos;Jan Willem Coebergh;Graham Byrnes

  • Survival of European children and young adults with cancer diagnosed 1995-2002.

    Gemma Gatta;Giulia Zigon;Riccardo Capocaccia;Jan Willem Coebergh

  • EURECCA colorectal: Multidisciplinary management: European consensus conference colon & rectum

    Cornelis J.H. Van De Velde;Petra G. Boelens;Josep M. Borras;Jan Willem Coebergh

  • Changing epidemiology of malignant cutaneous melanoma in Europe 1953-1997: rising trends in incidence and mortality but recent stabilizations in western Europe and decreases in Scandinavia.

    Esther De Vries;Esther De Vries;Freddie I. Bray;Jan Willem W. Coebergh;Donald M. Parkin

  • C-Reactive Protein Levels, Variation in the C-Reactive Protein Gene, and Cancer Risk: The Rotterdam Study

    Claire Siemes;Loes E. Visser;Jan-Willem W. Coebergh;Ted A.W. Splinter

  • Prognostic impact of increasing age and co-morbidity in cancer patients: A population-based approach

    Maryska L.G. Janssen-Heijnen;Saskia Houterman;Valery E.P.P. Lemmens;Marieke W.J. Louwman

  • The changing epidemiology of lung cancer in Europe

    Maryska L.G. Janssen-Heijnen;Jan-Willem W. Coebergh

  • Prevalence of co-morbidity in lung cancer patients and its relationship with treatment: A population-based study

    Maryska L.G Janssen-Heijnen;Rob M Schipper;Peter P.A Razenberg;Mariad A Crommelin

  • Stage at diagnosis is a key explanation of differences in breast cancer survival across Europe

    Milena Sant;Claudia Allemani;Riccardo Capocaccia;Timo Hakulinen

  • Predictors and survival of synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin: A population-based study

    Valery E. Lemmens;Yvonne L. Klaver;Vic J. Verwaal;Harm J. Rutten

  • The Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial treatment and Long term Evaluation of Survivorship registry: Scope, rationale and design of an infrastructure for the study of physical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivorship cohorts

    Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse;Nicole Horevoorts;Mies van Eenbergen;Johan Denollet

  • Understanding variations in survival for colorectal cancer in Europe: a EUROCARE high resolution study

    G Gatta;R Capocaccia;M Sant;C M J Bell

  • Incident cancer burden attributable to excess body mass index in 30 European countries

    Andrew G. Renehan;Isabelle Soerjomataram;Margaret Tyson;Matthias Egger;Matthias Egger

  • Cutaneous malignant melanoma in Europe.

    Elisabeth de Vries;Jan Willem Coebergh

Frequent Co-Authors

Otto Visser
Otto Visser VU University Medical Center
Isabelle Soerjomataram
Isabelle Soerjomataram International Agency For Research On Cancer
Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets
Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets Tilburg University
Eero Pukkala
Eero Pukkala Tampere University
Philip Poortmans
Philip Poortmans University of Antwerp
Charles A. Stiller
Charles A. Stiller Public Health England
Lambertus A. Kiemeney
Lambertus A. Kiemeney Radboud University
Freddie Bray
Freddie Bray International Agency For Research On Cancer
Franco Berrino
Franco Berrino Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Alexander M.M. Eggermont
Alexander M.M. Eggermont Institut Gustave Roussy

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and supplementary pathways in healthcare can open doors to diverse and in-demand careers. For students interested in the administrative side of healthcare, pursuing programs at medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid offers an accessible entry point. These programs prepare learners for vital back-office roles while often reducing financial barriers.

Nursing continues to be a high-growth field with flexible study options. If the idea of entrance exams is holding you back, consider a nursing school that does not require teas test, allowing for a smoother admissions process.

For those seeking leadership opportunities in healthcare, an online healthcare administration accelerated degree can fast-track your advancement toward management and executive roles.

Registered nurses aiming to expand their clinical expertise can benefit from a streamlined rn to np bridge program, paving the way toward becoming a nurse practitioner with greater autonomy and earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Willem Coebergh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles