World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
30
Citations
4158
World Ranking
9596
National Ranking
260

Bob W. van Dijk publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bob W. van Dijk sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 62 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Bob W. van Dijk D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bob W. van Dijk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bob W. van Dijk is affiliated with the VU University Medical Center in the Netherlands, with a research focus situated primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work encompasses several interconnected subfields, including Human-Computer Interaction, Ophthalmology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's research topics prominently involve Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology, Glaucoma and Retinal Disorders, and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens-related investigations.

Van Dijk has authored multiple recent papers that contribute to these areas. Notable publications include:

  • "A validation study on the accuracy and precision of gaze and vergence using stereoscopic eye-tracking technology," 2025, published in Behavior Research Methods
  • "Enhancing Calibration-Free Stereoscopic Eye-Tracking With the Navarro Aspherical Cornea Model," 2025, published in IEEE Access

The frequent co-authors collaborating with van Dijk reflect consistency in research partnerships. Key collaborators include:

  • Arthur R Pijpaert
  • Jeroen Goossens
  • L J Bert Roetman
  • Ruth M. A. van Nispen
  • Laurentius J René van Rijn

Publication venues for van Dijk's research are chiefly recognized journals within the relevant scientific communities, such as Behavior Research Methods and IEEE Access, each hosting one of the recent published works.

The scope of van Dijk's research, balancing technical and clinical aspects, addresses advancements in eye-tracking technologies and their application in ophthalmic health. This dual focus supports efforts to better understand, detect, and manage eye-related disorders while improving human-computer interaction systems.

Best Publications

  • Spatial patterns of visual cortical fast EEG during conditioned reflex in a rhesus monkey.

    Walter J. Freeman;Bob W. van Dijk

  • Altered temporal correlations in parietal alpha and prefrontal theta oscillations in early-stage Alzheimer disease

    Teresa Montez;Simon-Shlomo Poil;Bethany F. Jones;Ilonka Manshanden

  • Disturbed functional connectivity in brain tumour patients: Evaluation by graph analysis of synchronization matrices

    Fabrice Bartolomei;Fabrice Bartolomei;Ingeborg Bosma;Martin Klein;Johannes C. Baayen

  • Generalized synchronization of MEG recordings in Alzheimer's Disease: evidence for involvement of the gamma band.

    Cornelis J Stam;Anne Marie van Cappellen van Walsum;Yolande A L Pijnenburg;Henk W Berendse

  • Mathematical dipoles are adequate to describe realistic generators of human brain activity

    Unknown

  • Nonlinear synchronization in EEG and whole-head MEG recordings of healthy subjects.

    Cornelis J Stam;Michael Breakspear;Michael Breakspear;Anne-Marie van Cappellen van Walsum;Bob W van Dijk

  • Magnetoencephalographic analysis of cortical activity in Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study.

    H.W Berendse;J.P.A Verbunt;Ph Scheltens;B.W van Dijk

  • How do brain tumors alter functional connectivity? A magnetoencephalography study.

    Fabrice Bartolomei;Ingeborg Bosma;Martin Klein;Johannes C. Baayen

  • Disturbed functional brain networks and neurocognitive function in low-grade glioma patients: a graph theoretical analysis of resting-state MEG

    Ingeborg Bosma;Jaap C Reijneveld;Martin Klein;Linda Douw

  • Synchronized brain activity and neurocognitive function in patients with low-grade glioma: a magnetoencephalography study.

    Ingeborg Bosma;Linda Douw;Fabrice Bartolomei;Jan J. Heimans

  • Integrating cross-frequency and within band functional networks in resting-state MEG: A multi-layer network approach

    Prejaas Tewarie;Arjan Hillebrand;Bob W van Dijk;Cornelis J Stam

  • Resting-state oscillatory brain dynamics in Alzheimer disease.

    Willem de Haan;Cornelis J. Stam;Bethany F. Jones;Ilonka M. Zuiderwijk

  • Multiple sclerosis patients show a highly significant decrease in alpha band interhemispheric synchronization measured using MEG.

    Keith S Cover;Hugo Vrenken;Jeroen J G Geurts;Bob W van Oosten

  • A neural complexity measure applied to MEG data in Alzheimer's disease

    A.-M van Cappellen van Walsum;Y.A.L Pijnenburg;H.W Berendse;B.W van Dijk

  • Cognitive and clinical dysfunction, altered MEG resting-state networks and thalamic atrophy in multiple sclerosis.

    Prejaas Tewarie;Menno M. Schoonheim;Cornelis J. Stam;Marieke L. van der Meer

  • Motion-onset visual-evoked potentials as a function of retinal eccentricity in man

    Ljudmila Schlykowa;Bob W. van Dijk;Walter H. Ehrenstein

  • Magnetoencephalography as a Putative Biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease

    Edward Zamrini;Fernando Maestu;Eero Pekkonen;Michael Funke

  • Assessing the reproducibility of the SienaX and Siena brain atrophy measures using the ADNI back-to-back MP-RAGE MRI scans

    Keith S. Cover;Ronald A. van Schijndel;Bob W. van Dijk;Alberto Redolfi

  • Top-down modulation in human visual cortex predicts the stability of a perceptual illusion

    N.A. Kloosterman;T. Meindertsma;A. Hillebrand;B.W. van Dijk

  • Visual stimulation reduces EEG activity in man.

    Peter C.M. Vijn;Bob W. van Dijk;Henk Spekreijse

  • A Healthy Brain in a Healthy Body: Brain Network Correlates of Physical and Mental Fitness

    Linda Douw;Dagmar Nieboer;Bob W. van Dijk;Cornelis J. Stam

Frequent Co-Authors

Cornelis J. Stam
Cornelis J. Stam Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Frederik Barkhof
Frederik Barkhof University College London
Hugo Vrenken
Hugo Vrenken Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Giovanni B. Frisoni
Giovanni B. Frisoni University of Geneva
Henk Spekreijse
Henk Spekreijse University of Amsterdam
Philip Scheltens
Philip Scheltens Amsterdam UMC
Linda Douw
Linda Douw Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Martin Klein
Martin Klein Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dirk L. Knol
Dirk L. Knol VU University Medical Center
Arjan Hillebrand
Arjan Hillebrand Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience isn’t the only pathway to a rewarding career. Many students are considering the most lucrative majors in science and healthcare, which can offer competitive salaries and high demand. These majors often align with neuroscience by emphasizing critical thinking, data analysis, and research skills.

For those seeking flexible educational options, there are fafsa-approved online certificate programs in related fields like psychology, biology, or health sciences. These accredited programs make it easier to access federal financial aid and pursue education remotely.

If you’re interested in quicker entry into the workforce, consider short certificate programs that pay well. These programs focus on practical skills and can jumpstart careers in allied health, research assistance, or data analysis within months.

For those balancing studies with other commitments, there are also easy degrees to get online. These degree paths typically offer flexibility, lighter workloads, and can still provide valuable knowledge relevant to neuroscience and healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Bob W. van Dijk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles