World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
8148
World Ranking
7829
National Ranking
4208

Marshall M. Haith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marshall M. Haith sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marshall M. Haith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marshall M. Haith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1978 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1978 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Marshall M. Haith is affiliated with the University of Denver in the United States. Their academic career includes recognition by major scientific organizations, reflecting involvement in broader scientific communities.

In 1978, they were named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). The same year, they were also awarded Fellow status by the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation. These honors indicate recognition by peers and institutions for contributions to their field.

There is no specific data available about recent publications, co-authors, main or subfields of study, or particular topics covered in their research. Similarly, no book publications or frequent publication venues are listed. The absence of detailed research outputs in the data limits elaboration on the scope or focus of their scholarly work.

Overall, Marshall M. Haith's profile is characterized by an academic affiliation with a U.S. university and honors awarded in the late 1970s. Details on specific research contributions, collaborations, or thematic areas of work are not documented here.

Best Publications

  • Phonological Processing Skills and Deficits in Adult Dyslexics

    Bruce F. Pennington;Guy C. van Orden;Shelley D. Smith;Phyllis A. Green

  • Expectation and Anticipation of Dynamic Visual Events by 3.5-Month-Old Babies.

    Marshall M. Haith;Cindy Hazan;Gail S. Goodman

  • EYE CONTACT AND FACE SCANNING IN EARLY INFANCY

    Marshall M. Haith;Terry Bergman;Michael J. Moore

  • Eye contact and face scanning in early infancy.

    Marshall M. Haith;Terry Bergman;Michael J. Moore

  • Who put the cog in infant cognition ? Is rich interpretation too costly ?

    Marshall M. Haith

  • The five to seven year shift : the age of reason and responsibility

    Arnold J. Sameroff;Marshall M. Haith

  • Young Infants' Visual Expectations for Symmetric and Asymmetric Stimulus Sequences.

    Richard L. Canfield;Marshall M. Haith

  • Phonological Processing Skills and Deficits in Adult Dyslexics

    Unknown

  • Infancy and developmental psychobiology

    Joseph J. Campos;Marshall M. Haith

  • Infant predictors of preschool and adult IQ: A study of infant twins and their parents.

    Lisabeth F. DiLalla;L. A. Thompson;Robert Plomin;Kay Phillips

  • When a child takes the stand: Jurors' perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony.

    Gail S. Goodman;Jonathan M. Golding;Vicki S. Helgeson;Marshall M. Haith

  • The development of future-oriented processes

    Marshall M. Haith;Janette B. Benson;Ralph J. Roberts Jr.;Bruce F. Pennington

  • Left-handedness and immune disorders in familial dyslexics.

    Bruce F. Pennington;Shelley D. Smith;William J. Kimberling;Phyllis A. Green

  • Jurors' Reactions to Child Witnesses

    Gail S. Goodman;Jonathan M. Golding;Marshall M. Haith

  • Information Processing Through the First Year of Life: A Longitudinal Study Using the Visual Expectation Paradigm

    Unknown

  • Automatic Processing as a Function of Age and Reading Ability.

    Robert E. Guttentag;Marshall M. Haith

  • Stability of Visual Expectations at 3.0 Months of Age.

    Marshall M. Haith;Michael E. McCarty

  • Face scanning and responsiveness to social cues in infant rhesus monkeys.

    Morton J. Mendelson;Marshall M. Haith;Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic

  • Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development

    Marshall M. Haith;Janette B. Benson

  • Infant expectations and reaction time as predictors of childhood speed of processing and IQ.

    Thomas M. Dougherty;Marshall M. Haith

  • Peripheral Visual Processing.

    Deborah Lott Holmes;Karen M. Cohen;Marshall M. Haith;Frederick J. Morrison

  • The Relation between Audition and Vision in the Human Newborn

    Unknown

  • Development of visual organization: the perception of subjective contours.

    Bennett I. Bertenthal;Joseph J. Campos;Marshall M. Haith

  • The partial-lag design: A method for controlling spontaneous regression in the infant-control habituation paradigm*

    Bennett I. Bertenthal;Marshall M. Haith;Joseph J. Campos

  • The 5- to 7-Year Shift: Does It Still Exist?@@@The Five to Seven Year Shift: The Age of Reason and Responsibility

    Denise Davidson;Arnold J. Sameroff;Marshall M. Haith

Frequent Co-Authors

Gail S. Goodman
Gail S. Goodman University of California, Davis
Bruce F. Pennington
Bruce F. Pennington University of Denver
Jerome Kagan
Jerome Kagan Harvard University
Michael J. Moore
Michael J. Moore Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Jonathan M. Golding
Jonathan M. Golding University of Kentucky
Arnold J. Sameroff
Arnold J. Sameroff University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Joseph J. Campos
Joseph J. Campos University of California, Berkeley
David W. Fulker
David W. Fulker University of Colorado Boulder
Bennett I. Bertenthal
Bennett I. Bertenthal Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree online opens up several specialized career pathways, particularly in behavioral analysis. One prominent route is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a credential highly valued in educational and healthcare settings. Each state, and even specific cities, may have unique steps and coursework requirements for this certification.

To get a clearer picture, it’s worth reviewing the bcba certification requirements in Columbus or understanding the process of becoming a bcba in Corpus Christi. These guides outline everything from necessary graduate degrees to supervised fieldwork. If you are planning to work in Texas, you may also want to check out the specific Dallas bcba education requirements.

For those considering the profession in Colorado, learning about the Denver bcba requirements can help you anticipate the steps you’ll need to take. No matter your location, pursuing these advanced credentials online can offer the flexibility and targeted expertise needed for long-term career growth in psychology and behavioral sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Marshall M. Haith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles