World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 70 2259 2059 1317 1173 192 20619

David W. Fulker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David W. Fulker between 1966 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David W. Fulker published across 58 years, from 1966 to 2023, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 1988. 3 of the 202 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 1988. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 4 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 3 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 8 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 10 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 19 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 15 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication
1966 2023

202 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David W. Fulker: publications per year, 1966 to 2023
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 0
1968 1
1969 0
1970 4
1971 1
1972 3
1973 3
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 6
1980 2
1981 8
1982 0
1983 8
1984 10
1985 3
1986 8
1987 4
1988 19
1989 10
1990 8
1991 6
1992 15
1993 13
1994 9
1995 13
1996 8
1997 6
1998 9
1999 11
2000 0
2001 4
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 1
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
2020 0
2021 1
2022 2
2023 1
Total 202
Download as CSV

David W. Fulker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Fulker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 192 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 192
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

David W. Fulker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Fulker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 70
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1996 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

David W. Fulker is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Surgery. Subfields of study within their work include Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Rheumatology.

Their research topics center on Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes, Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty, Orthopedic Infections and Treatments, Coronary Artery Anomalies, Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair, Pericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade, as well as knee injuries and reconstruction techniques.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David W. Fulker include Simon W. Young, Nina Zeng, Mei Lin Tay, Christina I. Esposito, and Matthew Carter.

Key recent publications demonstrate engagement with clinical trials, orthopedic surgery, and cardiovascular research. Selected papers include:

  • A prospective randomised controlled trial of mechanical axis with soft tissue release balancing vs functional alignment with bony resection balancing in total knee replacement-a study using Stryker Mako robotic arm-assisted technology (2022, Trials)
  • Evaluation of Proximal Femoral Bone Mineral Density in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty (2023, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery)
  • Investigating the haemodynamics of myocardial bridging (2021, Experiments in Fluids)
  • A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial of Mechanical Axis with Soft Tissue Release Balancing vs Functional Alignment with Bony Resection Balancing in Total Knee Replacement - A Study Using Stryker Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted Technology (2022, Research Square)

Their contributions appear predominantly in journals related to orthopedic surgery and cardiovascular research, including Trials, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Experiments in Fluids, and Research Square.

David W. Fulker was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1996.

Best Publications

  • The Science and Politics of IQ

    D. W. Fulker;Leon J. Kamin

  • Multiple Regression Analysis of Twin Data

    J. C. DeFries;David W. Fulker

  • Altruism and aggression: The heritability of individual differences.

    J. P. Rushton;D. W. Fulker;M. C. Neale;D. K. B. Nias

  • Quantitative trait locus for reading disability on chromosome 6.

    Lon R. Cardon;Shelley D. Smith;David W. Fulker;William J. Kimberling

  • Comparison of the biometrical genetical, MAVA, and classical approaches to the analysis of the human behavior.

    Unknown

  • Specific Deficits in Component Reading and Language Skills: Genetic and Environmental Influences

    Richard Olson;Barbara Wise;Frances Conners;John Rack

  • Genotype-environment correlations in late childhood and early adolescence: antisocial behavioral problems and coercive parenting.

    Thomas G. O'Connor;Kirby Deater-Deckard;David Fulker;Michael Rutter

  • Combined Linkage and Association Sib-Pair Analysis for Quantitative Traits

    D.W. Fulker;D.W. Fulker;S.S. Cherny;S.S. Cherny;P.C. Sham;J.K. Hewitt

  • Nature and nurture during infancy and early childhood

    Robert Plomin;John C. DeFries;David W. Fulker

  • A simple genetic basis for a complex psychological trait in laboratory mice

    Jonathan Flint;Robin Corley;John C. DeFries;David W. Fulker

  • Evidence for a genetic aetiology in reading disability of twins

    J. C. DeFries;David W. Fulker;Michele C. LaBuda

  • Linkage between sexual orientation and chromosome Xq28 in males but not in females

    Stella Hu;Angela M. L. Pattatucci;Chavis Patterson;Lin Li

  • Multiple regression analysis of twin data: etiology of deviant scores versus individual differences.

    J.C. DeFries;D.W. Fulker

  • Temperament, emotion, and cognition at fourteen months: the MacArthur Longitudinal Twin Study.

    Robert N. Emde;Robert Plomin;JoAnn Robinson;Robin Corley

  • Testing structural equation models for twin data using LISREL.

    Andrew Heath;M. C. Neale;J. K. Hewitt;L. J. Eaves

  • Quantitative-Trait Locus for Specific Language and Reading Deficits on Chromosome 6p

    Javier Gayán;Shelley D. Smith;Stacey S. Cherny;Stacey S. Cherny;Lon R. Cardon

  • Genetic Change and Continuity from Fourteen to Twenty Months: The MacArthur Longitudinal Twin Study

    Robert Plomin;Jerome Kagan;Robert N. Emde;J. Steven Reznick

  • A genetic and environmental analysis of sensation seeking

    David W Fulker;Sybil B.G Eysenck;Marvin Zuckerman

  • Nature, Nurture, and Cognitive Development from 1 to 16 Years: A Parent-Offspring Adoption Study

    Robert Plomin;David W. Fulker;Robin Corley;John C DeFries

  • High-resolution mapping of quantitative trait loci in outbred mice

    Christopher J. Talbot;Alison Nicod;Stacey S. Cherny;David W. Fulker

  • Genetic Influence on Tester-Rated Infant Temperament as Assessed by Bayley's Infant Behavior Record: Nonadoptive and Adoptive Siblings and Twins.

    Julia M. Braungart;Robert Plomin;J. C. DeFries;David W. Fulker

  • A sib-pair approach to interval mapping of quantitative trait loci

    Fulker Dw;Cardon Lr

Frequent Co-Authors

John C. DeFries
John C. DeFries University of Colorado Boulder
Robert Plomin
Robert Plomin King's College London
Stacey S. Cherny
Stacey S. Cherny Tel Aviv University
Robin P. Corley
Robin P. Corley University of Colorado Boulder
Robert N. Emde
Robert N. Emde University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
John K. Hewitt
John K. Hewitt University of Colorado Boulder
Lon R. Cardon
Lon R. Cardon The Jackson Laboratory
Hans J. Eysenck
Hans J. Eysenck King's College London
Hilary Coon
Hilary Coon University of Utah
Sally J. Wadsworth
Sally J. Wadsworth University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up a wide range of online degree options and specialized career paths. One of the fastest-growing fields is Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), with the Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) credential being highly sought after across the USA.

Requirements to become a BCBA can vary by location, so it's important to know the specific steps for your area. For instance, if you are interested in becoming a bcba in Dallas, you’ll need to follow state and city regulations in addition to national certification standards. Likewise, you can find detailed guidance on how to start how to become a bcba in Denver.

For those living in the Midwest, Detroit bcba requirements highlight the importance of selecting accredited programs and fulfilling supervised experience hours. Meanwhile, individuals interested in opportunities in North Carolina can review steps for becoming a bcba in Durham.

No matter where you are located, psychology degrees paired with online ABA coursework and field experience can prepare you for a rewarding and impactful career. Explore your options and align your education with your long-term goals.

Best Scientists Citing David W. Fulker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles