World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Keith E. Stanovich

Keith E. Stanovich

Award Badge
Psychology
Canada
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
118
Citations
85512
World Ranking
271
National Ranking
6

Keith E. Stanovich publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith E. Stanovich sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 306 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Keith E. Stanovich D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith E. Stanovich sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Canada Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Canada Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Canada Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Canada Leader Award
  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 2012 - E. L. Thorndike Award, American Psychological Association
  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Keith E. Stanovich is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their main field of study is Social Sciences, with a focus on several subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Statistics and Probability, and Political Science and International Relations.

Stanovich's research covers a range of topics, such as:

  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Media Influence and Health

Recent papers by Stanovich include:

  • "Actively Open-Minded Thinking and Its Measurement," 2023, published in Journal of Intelligence
  • "Conspiracy beliefs in the context of a comprehensive rationality assessment," 2024, published in Thinking & Reasoning
  • "A good architecture for fast and slow thinking, but exclusivity is exclusively in the past," 2023, published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • "Toward a Psychology of Ideas Rather Than Demographics: Commentary on Hommel (2024)," 2024, published in Perspectives on Psychological Science

Co-authors frequently collaborating with Stanovich are:

  • Maggie E. Toplak
  • Richard F. West

Stanovich has contributed to several academic venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Thinking & Reasoning
  • Journal of Intelligence
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science

Their book publications include a work released by The MIT Press titled The Bias That Divides Us (2021).

Awards received by Stanovich include:

  • Fellow of the American Educational Research Association, 2013
  • E. L. Thorndike Award, American Psychological Association, 2012
  • Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), 1994

Best Publications

  • MATTHEW EFFECTS IN READING: SOME CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE ACQUISITION OF LITERACY

    Keith E. Stanovich;Keith E. Stanovich

  • Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?

    Keith E. Stanovich;Richard F. West

  • Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate

    Jonathan St. B. T. Evans;Keith E. Stanovich

  • TOWARD AN INTERACTIVE-COMPENSATORY MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF READING FLUENCY

    Keith E. Stanovich

  • Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later.

    Anne E. Cunningham;Keith E. Stanovich

  • Who Is Rational?: Studies of individual Differences in Reasoning

    Keith E. Stanovich

  • Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model.

    Keith E. Stanovich;Linda S. Siegel

  • Progress in Understanding Reading: Scientific Foundations and New Frontiers

    Keith E. Stanovich

  • Explaining the Differences Between the Dyslexic and the Garden-Variety Poor Reader The Phonological-Core Variable-Difference Model

    Keith E. Stanovich

  • What Reading Does for the Mind.

    Anne E. Cunningham;Keith E. Stanovich

  • Practitioner Review: Do performance-based measures and ratings of executive function assess the same construct?

    Maggie E. Toplak;Richard F. West;Keith E. Stanovich

  • Exposure to print and orthographic processing.

    Keith E Stanovich;Richard F. West

  • Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability

    Keith E Stanovich;Anne E Cunningham;Barbara B Cramer

  • Rationality and the Reflective Mind

    Keith E. Stanovich

  • The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks

    Maggie E. Toplak;Richard F. West;Keith E. Stanovich

  • On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability.

    Keith E. Stanovich;Richard F. West

  • Individual differences in rational thought.

    Keith E. Stanovich;Richard F. West

  • The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin

    Keith E. Stanovich

  • Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test

    Maggie E. Toplak;Richard F. West;Keith E. Stanovich

  • Speculations on the Causes and Consequences of Individual Differences in Early Reading Acquisition

    Keith E. Stanovich

  • Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?

    Keith E. Stanovich;Richard F. West

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard F. West
Richard F. West James Madison University
Maggie E. Toplak
Maggie E. Toplak York University
Linda S. Siegel
Linda S. Siegel University of British Columbia
Jonathan St. B. T. Evans
Jonathan St. B. T. Evans Plymouth University
Richard M. Sorrentino
Richard M. Sorrentino University of Western Ontario
Joachim I. Krueger
Joachim I. Krueger Brown University
Barry Schwartz
Barry Schwartz Swarthmore College
David R. Olson
David R. Olson University of Toronto
Mike Oaksford
Mike Oaksford Birkbeck, University of London
Andrew M. Colman
Andrew M. Colman University of Leicester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to a range of career options, including mental health counseling, school psychology, and clinical research. Many programs offer flexible online study, making it easier to balance coursework with other responsibilities.

If you're considering becoming a mental health counselor, it’s important to understand the various educational paths and requirements across different regions. For example, Glendale mental health counselor education requirements focus on graduate degrees, supervised clinical experience, and state licensure. Similarly, learn about how to become a mental health counselor in Greensboro to get insight into region-specific steps and qualifications.

Prospective counselors should also research Henderson mental health counselor education requirements, which emphasize accredited graduate programs and exam preparation. Those interested in Hawaii should review the Honolulu mental health counselor certification requirements to understand local licensure standards.

As you consider online degrees and pathways in psychology, make sure your chosen program aligns with the professional requirements in your intended area of practice.

Best Scientists Citing Keith E. Stanovich

Trending Scientists