World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
60
Citations
14544
World Ranking
3237
National Ranking
126

Leonid Sigal publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonid Sigal sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 211 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Leonid Sigal D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonid Sigal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Leonid Sigal is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, with a strong focus on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. They have contributed extensively to topics such as Multimodal Machine Learning Applications, Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning, Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques, Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis, Advanced Vision and Imaging, Human Pose and Action Recognition, and Video Analysis and Summarization.

Their work includes papers published in various venues, reflecting a multidisciplinary engagement with both conferences and journals. Recent publications include:

  • Light Field Neural Rendering, 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • Referring Transformer: A One-step Approach to Multi-task Visual Grounding, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • HyperSOR: Context-Aware Graph Hypernetwork for Salient Object Ranking, 2024, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • VLC-BERT: Visual Question Answering with Contextualized Commonsense Knowledge, 2023, 2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
  • Layout2image: Image Generation from Layout, 2020, International Journal of Computer Vision

Leonid Sigal has frequently published in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), SSRN Electronic Journal, Pattern Recognition, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, and the International Journal of Computer Vision. The arXiv platform hosts the majority of their work, with over 50 publications there.

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their research. Frequent co-authors include Raghav Goyal, Aditya Chinchure, James J. Little, Carlos Esteves, and Ameesh Makadia, with multiple joint publications indicating ongoing research partnerships.

Their body of work spans both theoretical and applied domains, focusing on advancing methods in visual understanding and synthesis through machine learning techniques. This includes adapting models to work efficiently with limited data and improving the interpretability and performance of vision-based AI systems across various tasks.

Best Publications

  • HumanEva: Synchronized Video and Motion Capture Dataset and Baseline Algorithm for Evaluation of Articulated Human Motion

    Leonid Sigal;Alexandru O. Balan;Michael J. Black

  • Tracking loose-limbed people

    L. Sigal;S. Bhatia;S. Roth;M.J. Black

  • HumanEva: Synchronized Video and Motion Capture Dataset for Evaluation of Articulated Human Motion

    Leonid Sigal;Michael J. Black

  • Implicit Probabilistic Models of Human Motion for Synthesis and Tracking

    Hedvig Sidenbladh;Michael J. Black;Leonid Sigal

  • Learning Activity Progression in LSTMs for Activity Detection and Early Detection

    Shugao Ma;Leonid Sigal;Stan Sclaroff

  • Multi-Level Semantic Feature Augmentation for One-Shot Learning

    Zitian Chen;Yanwei Fu;Yinda Zhang;Yu-Gang Jiang

  • Skin color-based video segmentation under time-varying illumination

    L. Sigal;S. Sclaroff;V. Athitsos

  • Detailed Human Shape and Pose from Images

    A.O. Balan;L. Sigal;M.J. Black;J.E. Davis

  • High-Dimensional Feature Selection by Feature-Wise Kernelized Lasso

    Makoto Yamada;Wittawat Jitkrittum;Leonid Sigal;Eric P. Xing

  • Measure Locally, Reason Globally: Occlusion-sensitive Articulated Pose Estimation

    L. Sigal;M.J. Black

  • Poselet Key-Framing: A Model for Human Activity Recognition

    Michalis Raptis;Leonid Sigal

  • Multilevel Language and Vision Integration for Text-to-Clip Retrieval

    Huijuan Xu;Kun He;Bryan A. Plummer;Leonid Sigal

  • 3D hand pose reconstruction using specialized mappings

    R. Rosales;V. Athitsos;L. Sigal;S. Sclaroff

  • Social roles in hierarchical models for human activity recognition

    Tian Lan;Leonid Sigal;Greg Mori

  • A Quantitative Evaluation of Video-based 3D Person Tracking

    A.O. Balan;L. Sigal;M.J. Black

  • Estimation and prediction of evolving color distributions for skin segmentation under varying illumination

    L. Sigal;S. Sclaroff;V. Athitsos

  • Combined discriminative and generative articulated pose and non-rigid shape estimation

    Leonid Sigal;Alexandru Balan;Michael J. Black

  • Motion capture from body-mounted cameras

    Takaaki Shiratori;Hyun Soo Park;Leonid Sigal;Yaser Sheikh

  • Image Generation From Layout

    Bo Zhao;Lili Meng;Weidong Yin;Leonid Sigal

  • Joint Summarization of Large-Scale Collections of Web Images and Videos for Storyline Reconstruction

    Gunhee Kim;Leonid Sigal;Eric P. Xing

  • Improved Few-Shot Visual Classification

    Peyman Bateni;Raghav Goyal;Vaden Masrani;Frank Wood

  • Visual Analysis of Humans

    Thomas B. Moeslund;Adrian Hilton;Volker Krüger;Leonid Sigal

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Black
Michael J. Black Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
Yanwei Fu
Yanwei Fu Fudan University
Stan Sclaroff
Stan Sclaroff Boston University
Greg Mori
Greg Mori Simon Fraser University
Sung Ju Hwang
Sung Ju Hwang Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Yu-Gang Jiang
Yu-Gang Jiang Fudan University
David J. Fleet
David J. Fleet University of Toronto
Jessica K. Hodgins
Jessica K. Hodgins Carnegie Mellon University
Xiangyang Xue
Xiangyang Xue Fudan University
Kate Saenko
Kate Saenko Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Computer Science opens multiple avenues, especially with the flexible study options now available online. Many students are looking for cheap online college classes to reduce education costs without sacrificing quality. These affordable options make a Computer Science education more accessible to a wider audience.

If your academic history includes a lower GPA, don’t let that discourage you. Several reputable online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa can still help you reach your goals and start your journey in tech fields.

For those interested in related fields, environmental science offers a multidisciplinary pathway. You might wonder what can you do with an environmental studies degree; the field leads to careers in sustainability, research, policy, and technology integration.

Looking to earn your degree sooner? There are also online computer science degree programs designed to help you graduate faster and enter the workforce quickly.

Best Scientists Citing Leonid Sigal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles