World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonathan St. B. T. Evans

Jonathan St. B. T. Evans

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
66
Citations
32419
World Ranking
2640
National Ranking
294

Jonathan St. B. T. Evans publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan St. B. T. Evans sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 209 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jonathan St. B. T. Evans D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan St. B. T. Evans sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan St. B. T. Evans is affiliated with Plymouth University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, particularly focusing on Medicine and Decision Sciences. The subfields of their work include Hepatology, General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research, Law, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's research encompasses a range of topics, primarily centered on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Hepatitis C virus research, Cognitive Science and Mapping, Complex Systems and Decision Making, Liver Disease and Transplantation, Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments, and Legal Education and Practice Innovations.

Jonathan St. B. T. Evans has authored several papers, with recent publications including:

  • The Rationality Debate in the Psychology of Reasoning: A Historical Review, 2021, The MIT Press eBooks
  • Locality, legitimacy and the limits of diversion: Reviewing youth justice in Jersey, 2022, CrimRxiv
  • New Directions for Research on Forgiveness in Organizations: Barriers and Boundary Conditions, 2022, Academy of Management Proceedings

They have also contributed to collaborative research involving other scientists in Medicine and Hepatology, as seen in publications such as Kidney transplant from hepatitis C positive donors to hepatitis C negative recipients: report on the first experience in the UK, 2020, Journal of Hepatology, and P20 A comparison of disease models in Hepatocellular carcinoma to study variations within Barcelona clinic liver cancer staging to refine prognosis and clinical decision, 2022, Abstracts.

Frequent co-authors in their work include Hsuan-Che Huang, Trevor Spoelma, David E. Over, Nicola J. Lambell, and Simon J. Handley.

Their work has appeared in various publication venues such as The MIT Press eBooks, Journal of Hepatology, CrimRxiv, Academy of Management Proceedings, and Abstracts.

Jonathan St. B. T. Evans also has a book publication with Cambridge University Press titled Human Reasoning, released in 2024.

Best Publications

  • Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition

    Jonathan St. B. T. Evans

  • Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate

    Jonathan St. B. T. Evans;Keith E. Stanovich

  • In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning

    Jonathan St.B.T. Evans

  • Bias in Human Reasoning: Causes and Consequences

    Jonathan St. B. T. Evans

  • In two minds: Dual processes and beyond.

    Jonathan St. B. T. Evans;Keith Frankish

  • Human Reasoning: The Psychology Of Deduction

    Jonathan St. B. T. Evans;Stephen E. Newstead;Ruth M. J. Byrne

  • The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: extension and evaluation.

    Jonathan St. B. T. Evans

  • Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning

    Jonathan St B. T. Evans

  • The psychology of deductive reasoning

    Jonathan St. B. T. Evans

  • Logic and human reasoning: an assessment of the deduction paradigm.

    Jonathan St B T Evans

  • Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning

    Jonathan St. B. T. Evans;Jodie Curtis-Holmes

  • Conditionals and conditional probability.

    Jonathan S t B T Evans;Simon J Handley;David E Over

  • On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning

    Jonathan St. B. T. Evans

  • Intuition and Reasoning: A Dual-Process Perspective

    Jonathan St B T Evans

  • Thinking Twice: Two minds in one brain

    Jonathan St. B. T. Evans

  • Dual-process theories of reasoning: Contemporary issues and developmental applications

    Jonathan St.B.T. Evans

  • How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many?

    Jonathan St. B. T. Evans

  • Hypothetical Thinking: Dual Processes in Reasoning and Judgement

    Jonathan St. B. T. Evans

  • The probability of causal conditionals.

    David E. Over;Constantinos Hadjichristidis;Jonathan St. B.T. Evans;Simon J. Handley

  • Thinking and reasoning : psychological approaches

    Jonathan St. B. T. Evans

  • Bias in human reasoning

    Jonathan St. B. T. Evans

Frequent Co-Authors

David E. Over
David E. Over Durham University
Simon J. Handley
Simon J. Handley Macquarie University
Valerie A. Thompson
Valerie A. Thompson University of Saskatchewan
Ruth M. J. Byrne
Ruth M. J. Byrne Trinity College Dublin
Steven A. Sloman
Steven A. Sloman Brown University
Linden J. Ball
Linden J. Ball University of Central Lancashire
Keith E. Stanovich
Keith E. Stanovich University of Toronto
Jonathan Scourfield
Jonathan Scourfield Cardiff University
Gordon Pennycook
Gordon Pennycook Cornell University
Mike Oaksford
Mike Oaksford Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of meaningful careers. Social work is a popular pathway for psychology graduates, especially with the growing demand for online degrees that offer flexibility and accessibility. Before choosing this direction, it’s essential to understand the varying educational and licensing requirements across states.

For example, if you’re interested in learning how to become a social worker in Massachusetts, you will need to meet specific academic and supervised practice mandates. Similarly, there are unique Michigan social work license requirements to fulfill if you wish to work there.

Other states like Minnesota also have their own procedures, which you can explore by reviewing how to become a social worker in Minnesota. Prospective students in the South should note the different Mississippi social work education requirements as well.

By considering such requirements as you progress in your studies, you can confidently navigate your way toward a fulfilling career in psychology, counseling, or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan St. B. T. Evans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles