World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonathan Scourfield

Jonathan Scourfield

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
44
Citations
7141
World Ranking
4185
National Ranking
710

Jonathan Scourfield publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Scourfield sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 234 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jonathan Scourfield D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Scourfield sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan Scourfield is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom and has a substantial body of research primarily focused on social sciences, psychology, and health professions. Their academic contributions span several subfields including clinical psychology, general health professions, sociology and political science, safety research, and education.

Their research topics mainly cover child abuse and trauma, child welfare and adoption, homelessness and social issues, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, social work education and practice, migration, health and trauma, and suicide and self-harm studies.

The following recent papers illustrate the scope of Jonathan Scourfield's research work:

  • Contacts with primary and secondary healthcare prior to suicide: case-control whole-population-based study using person-level linked routine data in Wales, UK, 2000-2017 (2020), published in The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • Untangling child welfare inequalities and the 'Inverse Intervention Law' in England (2020), published in Children and Youth Services Review
  • Intensive Family Preservation Services to prevent out-of-home placement of children: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020), published in Child Abuse & Neglect
  • Cuts both ways: Ethnicity, poverty, and the social gradient in child welfare interventions (2020), published in Children and Youth Services Review
  • Staff Wellbeing and Retention in Children's Social Work: Systematic Review of Interventions (2021), published in Research on Social Work Practice

Jonathan Scourfield has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Nell Warner, Ann John, Rebecca Cannings-John, Martin Elliott, and Rhiannon Evans.

Their work has appeared in multiple publication venues with recurring contributions in:

  • The British Journal of Social Work
  • Children and Youth Services Review
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal for Population Data Science
  • Child Abuse & Neglect

Jonathan Scourfield's research integrates various strands of social sciences and health-related disciplines with a particular emphasis on topics relating to child welfare, trauma, and social work practices. Their studies often address systemic issues in social care and health services, aiming to better understand factors affecting vulnerable populations across different contexts.

Best Publications

  • Avoiding shame: young LGBT people, homophobia and self‐destructive behaviours

    Elizabeth McDermott;Katrina Roen;Jonathan Scourfield

  • Gender and Child Protection

    Jonathan Bryn Scourfield

  • Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender young people's experiences of distress: resilience, ambivalence and self-destructive behaviour

    Jonathan Scourfield;Katrina Roen;Liz McDermott

  • Engaging fathers in child welfare services: a narrative review of recent research evidence

    Nina Maxwell;Jonathan Bryn Scourfield;Brid Featherstone;Sally Holland

  • Social work, poverty, and child welfare interventions

    Kate Morris;Will Mason;Paul Bywaters;Brid Featherstone

  • Comparison of suicidal ideation, suicide attempt and suicide in children and young people in care and non-care populations: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence

    Rhiannon Emily Evans;James White;Ruth Turley;Thomas Slater

  • Children, Place and Identity: Nation and Locality in Middle Childhood

    Jonathan Scourfield;Bella Dicks;Mark Drakeford;Andrew James Davies

  • Analysing the connectivity and communication of suicidal users on twitter

    Gualtiero B. Colombo;Pete Burnap;Andrei Hodorog;Jonathan Scourfield

  • When things fall apart: Gender and suicide across the life-course

    Michael Shiner;Jonathan Bryn Scourfield;Ben Fincham;Susanne Langer

  • Machine Classification and Analysis of Suicide-Related Communication on Twitter

    Pete Burnap;Walter Colombo;Jonathan Scourfield

  • Sociological autopsy: An integrated approach to the study of suicide in men

    Jonathan Bryn Scourfield;Ben Fincham;Susanne Langer;Michael Shiner

  • The challenge of engaging fathers in the child protection process

    Jonathan Bryn Scourfield

  • Exploring inequities in child welfare and child protection services: Explaining the ‘inverse intervention law’

    Paul Bywaters;Geraldine Brady;Tim Sparks;Elizabeth Bos

  • Inequalities in English child protection practice under austerity: A universal challenge?

    Paul Bywaters;Geraldine Brady;Lisa Bunting;Brigid Daniel

  • Working with Men in Health and Social Care

    Brid Featherstone;Mark Rivett;Jonathan Scourfield

  • Child welfare inequalities in the four nations of the UK

    Paul Bywaters;Jonathan Scourfield;Chantel Jones;Tim Sparks

  • Recency of Divorce, Depression, and Suicide Risk:

    Steven Stack;Jonathan Bryn Scourfield

  • Multi-class machine classification of suicide-related communication on Twitter.

    Peter Burnap;Gualtiero Colombo;Rosie Amery;Andrei Hodorog

  • Risk, Reflexivity and Social Control in Child Protection: New Times or same Old Story?

    Jonathan Bryn Scourfield;Ian Welsh

  • Constructing Men in Child Protection Work

    Jonathan Bryn Scourfield

Frequent Co-Authors

Brid Featherstone
Brid Featherstone University of Huddersfield
Simon Murphy
Simon Murphy Cardiff University
David Gunnell
David Gunnell University of Bristol
David R. Foxcroft
David R. Foxcroft Oxford Brookes University
Peter Burnap
Peter Burnap Cardiff University
Laurence Moore
Laurence Moore University of Glasgow
Kerenza Hood
Kerenza Hood Cardiff University
Tim H. Sparks
Tim H. Sparks University of Cambridge
Keith Hawton
Keith Hawton University of Oxford
Stavros Petrou
Stavros Petrou University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to many online degree options in the USA. Programs such as the most affordable msw programs online allow you to earn a master's in social work at a lower cost, making advanced education more accessible.

For those interested in behavioral analysis, aspiring professionals can pursue bcba certification programs online. These programs are designed to meet Board Certified Behavior Analyst requirements while fitting into your schedule and your budget.

If you want to complete your studies in a shorter period, there are also accelerated social work degree options that combine quality with flexibility, allowing you to start your career sooner.

Psychology remains a popular and versatile field. Consider an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree online to quickly build academic credentials and gain access to diverse roles in counseling, education, or research.

Whichever path you choose, these online programs provide flexible routes to fulfilling and meaningful careers in Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Scourfield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles