World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
114
Citations
47770
World Ranking
4736
National Ranking
2566

Jay P. Mohr publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay P. Mohr sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 479 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jay P. Mohr D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay P. Mohr sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jay P. Mohr is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a specialized concentration in Neurology and related subfields including Epidemiology, Rehabilitation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Surgery.

The main topics addressed in their research encompass:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
  • Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders

Mohr's recent scholarly output includes several publications with notable focus on stroke and vascular disorders. Significant papers include:

  • "Medical management with interventional therapy versus medical management alone for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): final follow-up of a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial" (2020) published in The Lancet Neurology
  • "Stroke Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: International Expert Panel Review" (2021) published in Cerebrovascular Diseases
  • "The Role of Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Upon Clinical Complications and Outcomes" (2020) published in Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
  • "Predictors of hemorrhagic transformation after acute ischemic stroke based on the experts' opinion" (2020) published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
  • "Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project Classification: A proposed automated algorithm" (2021) published in European Stroke Journal

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers in the field. Their most frequent coauthors include:

  • João Brainer Clares de Andrade
  • Fabrício Oliveira Lima
  • Gisele Sampaio Silva
  • L. de M. Barros
  • João José Freitas de Carvalho

Jay P. Mohr has contributed to multiple articles in key journals such as Stroke, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, Cerebrovascular Diseases, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, and Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, reflecting a consistent engagement with leading venues in neurological and cerebrovascular research.

Best Publications

  • The Harvard Cooperative Stroke Registry: a prospective registry.

    J. P. Mohr;Louis R. Caplan;John W. Melski;Robert J. Goldstein

  • A comparison of warfarin and aspirin for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke.

    J.P. Mohr;J.L.P. Thompson;Ronald M. Lazar;Bruce Levin

  • The Stroke Data Bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics.

    Mary A. Foulkes;Philip A. Wolf;Thomas R. Price;J. P. Mohr

  • Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute thrombotic and embolic stroke

    Gregory J. Del Zoppo;Klaus Poeck;Michael S. Pessin;Samuel M. Wolpert

  • Effect of Medical Treatment in Stroke Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Stroke Study

    Shunichi Homma;Ralph L. Sacco;Marco R. Di Tullio;Robert R. Sciacca

  • Carotid Endarterectomy and Prevention of Cerebral Ischemia in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

    M R Mayberg;S E Wilson;F Yatsu;D G Weiss

  • Infarcts of undetermined cause: the NINCDS Stroke Data Bank.

    R. L. Sacco;J. H. Ellenberg;J. P. Mohr;T. K. Tatemichi

  • Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trial

    J. P. Mohr;Michael K. Parides;Christian Stapf;Christian Stapf;Ellen Moquete

  • Predictors of hemorrhage in patients with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation

    C. Stapf;H. Mast;R. R. Sciacca;J. H. Choi

  • Patent Foramen Ovale as a Risk Factor for Cryptogenic Stroke

    Marco Di Tullio;Ralph L. Sacco;Aasha Gopal;J. P. Mohr

  • Morning increase in onset of ischemic stroke.

    J R Marler;T R Price;G L Clark;J E Muller

  • Warfarin and Aspirin in Patients with Heart Failure and Sinus Rhythm

    Shunichi Homma;John L.P. Thompson;Patrick M. Pullicino;Bruce Levin

  • Dementia after stroke Baseline frequency, risks, and clinical features in a hospitalized cohort

    T. K. Tatemichi;D. W. Desmond;R. Mayeux;M. Paik

  • Frequency and clinical determinants of dementia after ischemic stroke

    David W. Desmond;Joan T. Moroney;Myunghee C. Paik;Mary Sano

  • Antiphospholipid antibodies and subsequent thrombo-occlusive events in patients with ischemic stroke.

    Steven R Levine;Robin L Brey;Barbara C Tilley;J L P Thompson

  • Demographic, Morphological, and Clinical Characteristics of 1289 Patients With Brain Arteriovenous Malformation

    C. Hofmeister;C. Stapf;A. Hartmann;R. R. Sciacca

  • The pilot Stroke Data Bank: definition, design, and data.

    Selma C. Kunitz;Cynthia R. Gross;Albert Heyman;Carlos S. Kase

  • Determinants of early recurrence of cerebral infarction. The Stroke Data Bank.

    Ralph L Sacco;M. A. Foulkes;J. P. Mohr;P. A. Wolf

  • Characteristics of patent foramen ovale associated with cryptogenic stroke. A biplane transesophageal echocardiographic study.

    S Homma;M R Di Tullio;R L Sacco;D Mihalatos

  • Stroke recurrence within 2 years after ischemic infarction.

    D B Hier;M A Foulkes;M Swiontoniowski;R L Sacco

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph L. Sacco
Ralph L. Sacco University of Miami
Shunichi Homma
Shunichi Homma Columbia University
Robert R. Sciacca
Robert R. Sciacca Columbia University
Philip A. Wolf
Philip A. Wolf Boston University
John R. Teerlink
John R. Teerlink University of California, San Francisco
Thomas R. Price
Thomas R. Price University of Maryland, Baltimore
Carlos S. Kase
Carlos S. Kase Boston University
Louis R. Caplan
Louis R. Caplan Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Piotr Ponikowski
Piotr Ponikowski Wrocław Medical University
Gregory Y.H. Lip
Gregory Y.H. Lip University of Liverpool

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The path to a career in medicine is diverse, and many students explore alternative online degrees to complement or accelerate their journey. For registered nurses aiming to reach the highest level of clinical practice quickly, considering the quickest dnp program can be an effective way to advance. These programs are ideal for those seeking doctoral-level credentials without spending additional years in school.

Flexibility is also a key concern for working professionals. Choosing the easiest dnp program online allows students to balance career demands while furthering their education, making progress toward leadership roles in healthcare.

Those looking to jumpstart their nursing career quickly may benefit from an accelerated lpn program. These fast-track options help career changers and recent graduates enter the medical field in less time.

For those interested in mental health, the fastest post master's pmhnp programs provide a rapid pathway toward becoming a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. These varied online pathways support a range of medical career goals, making them valuable options for aspiring healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Jay P. Mohr

Trending Scientists