World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Switzerland
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 123 3340 3115 41 39 1006 58465

Bernhard Meier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bernhard Meier between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bernhard Meier published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 21.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2014. 7 of the 1,053 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2014. 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 8 publications 1984: 11 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 14 publications 1987: 22 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 21 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 24 publications 1993: 16 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 20 publications 1996: 29 publications 1997: 28 publications 1998: 45 publications 1999: 21 publications 2000: 22 publications 2001: 24 publications 2002: 31 publications 2003: 30 publications 2004: 27 publications 2005: 29 publications 2006: 29 publications 2007: 36 publications 2008: 42 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 39 publications 2011: 44 publications 2012: 56 publications 2013: 47 publications 2014: 57 publications 2015: 48 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 1 publication
1978 2025

1,053 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bernhard Meier: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 2
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 8
1984 11
1985 9
1986 14
1987 22
1988 10
1989 7
1990 21
1991 10
1992 24
1993 16
1994 14
1995 20
1996 29
1997 28
1998 45
1999 21
2000 22
2001 24
2002 31
2003 30
2004 27
2005 29
2006 29
2007 36
2008 42
2009 23
2010 39
2011 44
2012 56
2013 47
2014 57
2015 48
2016 30
2017 27
2018 23
2019 21
2020 28
2021 15
2022 3
2023 3
2024 6
2025 1
Total 1,053
Download as CSV

Bernhard Meier publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Meier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,001–1,020 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,006 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77 1,006
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Bernhard Meier D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Meier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 122–123 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 123 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255 123
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Switzerland Leader Award

Overview

Bernhard Meier is affiliated with the University Hospital of Bern in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery, and Neurology. The major topics covered in their work include Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications, Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes, Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances, Acute Ischemic Stroke Management, and Cardiac Tumors and Thrombi.

They have contributed to a range of scientific papers, notable examples include:

  • EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion - an update, 2020, EuroIntervention
  • Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in an Analysis of Pooled Individual Patient Data From Randomized Trials of Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale After Stroke, 2021, JAMA
  • Proposal for Updated Nomenclature and Classification of Potential Causative Mechanism in Patent Foramen Ovale-Associated Stroke, 2020, JAMA Neurology
  • Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Data on Thrombus Characteristics, Treatment Strategies, and Clinical Outcomes From the EUROC-DRT-Registry, 2021, Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Pooled Analysis of PFO Occluder Device Trials in Patients With PFO and Migraine, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Bernhard Meier regularly collaborates with several coauthors, including Fabian Nietlispach, Heinrich P. Mattle, Steffen Gloekler, Stephan Windecker, and David M. Kent. These frequent collaborators have contributed to advancing research in related cardiovascular and neurological fields.

Their scientific output is published mainly in journals such as EuroIntervention, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, JAMA Neurology, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, and Stroke. These venues reflect their engagement with both interventional cardiology and neurological aspects of cardiovascular diseases.

The research topics Meier covers demonstrate a multidisciplinary approach, focusing on complex cardiovascular issues including atrial fibrillation and its outcomes, cardiac arrhythmias, diagnostic imaging, and complications related to stroke and thrombotic events. Their work also involves studies into the treatment methods for patent foramen ovale and device closure technologies.

Overall, Bernhard Meier's research career comprises an integration of clinical investigation, interventional techniques, and epidemiological analysis within cardiovascular medicine and its neurological consequences.

Best Publications

  • Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study

    Joost Daemen;Peter Wenaweser;Keiichi Tsuchida;Linda Abrecht

  • Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis

    Christoph Stettler;Christoph Stettler;Simon Wandel;Sabin Allemann;Adnan Kastrati

  • Incomplete Stent Apposition and Very Late Stent Thrombosis After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

    Stéphane Cook;Peter Wenaweser;Mario Togni;Michael Billinger

  • Fluvastatin for prevention of cardiac events following successful first percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

    Patrick W. J. C. Serruys;Pim de Feyter;Carlos Macaya;Norbert Kokott

  • Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Embolism

    Bernhard Meier;Bindu Kalesan;Heinrich P. Mattle;Ahmed Aziz Khattab

  • Restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel disease.

    Pierre P. Leimgruber;Gary S. Roubin;Jay Hollman;George A. Cotsonis

  • Angiographic follow-up after placement of a self-expanding coronary-artery stent.

    Patrick W. Serruys;Bradley H. Strauss;Kevin J. Beatt;Michel E. Bertrand

  • Sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization.

    Stephan Windecker;Andrea Remondino;Franz R. Eberli;Peter Jüni

  • Biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus sirolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer for coronary revascularisation (LEADERS): a randomised non-inferiority trial

    Stephan Windecker;Patrick Serruys;Simon Wandel;Pawel Buszman

  • Decreased Rate of Coronary Restenosis after Lowering of Plasma Homocysteine Levels

    Guido Schnyder;Marco Roffi;Riccardo Pin;Yvonne Flammer

  • Relation of the site of acute myocardial infarction to the most severe coronary arterial stenosis at prior angiography

    Didier Giroud;Jian M. Li;Philip Urban;Bernhard Meier

  • Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing TAVR : A Meta-Analysis

    George C.M. Siontis;Peter Jüni;Thomas Pilgrim;Stefan Stortecky

  • Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion (PLAATO System) to Prevent Stroke in High-Risk Patients With Non-Rheumatic Atrial Fibrillation : Results From the International Multi-Center Feasibility Trials

    Stefan H. Ostermayer;Mark Reisman;Paul H. Kramer;Ray V. Matthews

  • TREATMENT OF RENOVASCULAR HYPERTENSION WITH PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DILATATION OF A RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS

    Andreas Grüntzig;Wilhelm Vetter;Bernhard Meier;Ulrich Kuhlmann

  • Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial.

    Marie Claude Morice;Antonio Colombo;Bernhard Meier;Patrick Serruys

  • Incidence and correlates of drug-eluting stent thrombosis in routine clinical practice. 4-year results from a large 2-institutional cohort study.

    Peter Wenaweser;Joost Daemen;Marcel Zwahlen;Ron van Domburg

  • Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Paradoxical Embolism Long-Term Risk of Recurrent Thromboembolic Events

    Stephan Windecker;Andreas Wahl;Tushar Chatterjee;Ali Garachemani

  • Left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer cardiac plug in atrial fibrillation: initial European experience.

    Jai‐Wun Park;Armando Bethencourt;Horst Sievert;Gennaro Santoro

  • Left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: multicentre experience with the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug.

    Apostolos Tzikas;Samera Shakir;Sameer Gafoor;Heyder Omran

  • Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Associated With Paradoxic Coronary Vasoconstriction

    Mario Togni;Stephan Windecker;Rosangela Cocchia;Peter Wenaweser

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephan Windecker
Stephan Windecker University of Bern
Peter Wenaweser
Peter Wenaweser University of Bern
Peter Jüni
Peter Jüni University of Oxford
Otto M. Hess
Otto M. Hess University of Bern
Heinrich Mattle
Heinrich Mattle University of Bern
Thierry Carrel
Thierry Carrel University of Bern
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Thomas F. Lüscher
Thomas F. Lüscher University of Zurich
Horst Sievert
Horst Sievert Cardiovascular Center Frankfurt
Ulf Landmesser
Ulf Landmesser Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA, several online degrees and career pathways can help jumpstart or complement your journey in healthcare. For those seeking a swift entry into the field, a 6 month lpn program online offers an accelerated option to become a Licensed Practical Nurse without a lengthy on-campus commitment.

Professionals interested in mental health can enhance their credentials with the fastest pmhnp program. These specialized online programs prepare you for advanced practice roles as a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner, often in less time than traditional tracks.

Not all medical careers require direct patient care. If you’re drawn to leadership and the business side of health, consider a healthcare administration degree online to gain foundational management skills. For advanced opportunities, an affordable mha online program can open doors to higher-level executive positions in hospitals, clinics, or public health organizations.

Whether your interests lie in clinical care or healthcare administration, these flexible online options make it possible to advance your medical career and adapt to an evolving healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Bernhard Meier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles