World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
90
Citations
34854
World Ranking
583
National Ranking
263

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
90
Citations
34851
World Ranking
2408
National Ranking
1278

Patricia M. Glibert publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia M. Glibert sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 251 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Patricia M. Glibert D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia M. Glibert sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Patricia M. Glibert is affiliated with the University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences in the United States. Their research primarily addresses topics within Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, focusing extensively on Oceanography, Ecology, and Environmental Chemistry. The scientist contributes to understanding marine and coastal ecosystems, microbial community ecology and physiology, and marine toxins and detection methods.

Their research spans multiple disciplines, including global and planetary change as well as coastal and marine management. They have a significant output concerning oceanographic and atmospheric processes and the effects of ocean acidification. The main topics of their work include:

  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Marine Toxins and Detection Methods
  • Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Coastal and Marine Management

Patricia M. Glibert has published articles in several frequent venues, including:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin
  • Limnology and Oceanography
  • Harmful Algae
  • Frontiers in Marine Science

Frequent coauthors in their work include Ming Li, Cynthia A. Heil, So Hyun Ahn, Yuren Chen, and Fan Zhang. Collaborations with these researchers have contributed to a broad and diverse research portfolio.

Some of the recent papers produced include:

  • Harmful Algal Blooms in Chinese Coastal Waters Will Persist Due to Perturbed Nutrient Ratios, 2021, Environmental Science & Technology Letters
  • From webs, loops, shunts, and pumps to microbial multitasking: Evolving concepts of marine microbial ecology, the mixoplankton paradigm, and implications for a future ocean, 2022, Limnology and Oceanography
  • From hogs to HABs: impacts of industrial farming in the US on nitrogen and phosphorus and greenhouse gas pollution, 2020, Biogeochemistry
  • Effects of Dual Fronts on the Spatial Pattern of Chlorophyll-a Concentrations in and off the Changjiang River Estuary, 2021, Estuaries and Coasts
  • Mixoplankton and mixotrophy: future research priorities, 2023, Journal of Plankton Research

In 2012, Patricia M. Glibert was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Best Publications

  • Harmful Algal Blooms and Eutrophication: Nutrient Sources, Composition, and Consequences

    Donald M. Anderson;Patricia M. Glibert;Joann M. Burkholder

  • Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: A scientific consensus

    J. Heisler;P.M. Glibert;J.M. Burkholder;D.M. Anderson

  • Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions

    W. M. Kemp;W. R. Boynton;J. E. Adolf;D. F. Boesch

  • Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Examining linkages from selected coastal regions of the United States

    Donald M. Anderson;Joann M. Burkholder;William P. Cochlan;Patricia M. Glibert

  • Escalating worldwide use of urea - a global change contributing to coastal eutrophication

    Patricia M. Glibert;John Harrison;Cynthia Heil;Sybil Seitzinger

  • Pluses and minuses of ammonium and nitrate uptake and assimilation by phytoplankton and implications for productivity and community composition, with emphasis on nitrogen-enriched conditions

    Patricia M. Glibert;Frances P. Wilkerson;Richard C. Dugdale;John A. Raven;John A. Raven

  • Eutrophication, harmful algae and biodiversity - Challenging paradigms in a world of complex nutrient changes.

    Unknown

  • The global, complex phenomena of harmful algal blooms

    Patricia M. Glibert;Donald M. Anderson;Patrick Gentien;Edna Graneli

  • Mixotrophy, a major mode of nutrition for harmful algal species in eutrophic waters

    JoAnn M. Burkholder;Patricia M. Glibert;Hayley M. Skelton

  • Nitrogen Uptake, Dissolved Organic Nitrogen Release, and New Production

    Deborah A. Bronk;Patricia M. Glibert;Bess B. Ward

  • Harmful algae at the complex nexus of eutrophication and climate change

    Patricia M. Glibert

  • The Role of Eutrophication in the Global Proliferation of Harmful Algal Blooms

    Patricia Glibert;Sybil Seitzinger;Cynthia Heil;JoAnn Burkholder

  • Misuse of the phytoplankton-zooplankton dichotomy : the need to assign organisms as mixotrophs within plankton functional types

    Kevin J. Flynn;Diane K. Stoecker;Aditee Mitra;John A. Raven

  • The role of mixotrophic protists in the biological carbon pump

    Aditee Mitra;Kevin J. Flynn;Joann M. Burkholder;Terje Berge

  • Defining Planktonic Protist Functional Groups on Mechanisms for Energy and Nutrient Acquisition: Incorporation of Diverse Mixotrophic Strategies

    Aditee Mitra;Kevin J. Flynn;Urban Tillmann;John A. Raven

  • COMPARISONS OF NITRATE UPTAKE, STORAGE, AND REDUCTION IN MARINE DIATOMS AND FLAGELLATES

    Michael W. Lomas;Patricia M. Glibert

  • Prorocentrum minimum (Pavillard) Schiller A review of a harmful algal bloom species of growing worldwide importance

    Cynthia A. Heil;Patricia M. Glibert;Chunlei Fan

  • Effect of irradiances up to 2000 μE m−2 s−1 on marine Synechococcus WH7803—I. Growth, pigmentation, and cell composition

    Todd M. Kana;Patricia M. Glibert

  • Temperature regulation of nitrate uptake: A novel hypothesis about nitrate uptake and reduction in cool-water diatoms

    Michael W. Lomas;Patricia M. Glibert

  • Scales of Nutrient-Limited Phytoplankton Productivity in Chesapeake Bay

    Thomas C. Malone;Daniel J. Conley;Thomas R. Fisher;Patricia M. Glibert

  • Harmful algal blooms in the Chesapeake and coastal bays of Maryland, USA: Comparison of 1997, 1998, and 1999 events

    Patricia M. Glibert;Robert Magnien;Michael W. Lomas;Jeffrey Alexander

Frequent Co-Authors

JoAnn M. Burkholder
JoAnn M. Burkholder North Carolina State University
Cynthia A. Heil
Cynthia A. Heil Bigelow Laboratory For Ocean Sciences
Diane K. Stoecker
Diane K. Stoecker University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Todd M. Kana
Todd M. Kana University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Kevin J. Flynn
Kevin J. Flynn Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Edna Granéli
Edna Granéli Linnaeus University
Alexander F. Bouwman
Alexander F. Bouwman Utrecht University
Michael W. Lomas
Michael W. Lomas Bigelow Laboratory For Ocean Sciences
Arthur H. W. Beusen
Arthur H. W. Beusen Utrecht University
Donald M. Anderson
Donald M. Anderson Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences opens doors to several related online degrees that can enhance your knowledge and career prospects. For those mindful of cost, selecting a budget friendly online general studies degree can provide a solid foundation while keeping expenses manageable.

If flexibility and ease of completion are priorities, considering options like the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help streamline your educational path without compromising the core skills needed in environmental fields.

Specialized programs such as an online geoscience degree perfectly complement environmental science studies, focusing on earth systems and natural processes critical for sustainability careers.

Additionally, a gis degree equips professionals with the technical expertise to analyze spatial data, an increasingly important skill in environmental management and policy making. These related degrees offer diverse pathways to enrich your knowledge and enhance your impact in environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Patricia M. Glibert

Trending Scientists