World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 37 8951 8589 3210 2984 88 4802

Jeremy M. Testa publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeremy M. Testa between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeremy M. Testa published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2020. 14 of the 115 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2020. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 2 publications
2002 2026

115 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeremy M. Testa: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 3
2009 2
2010 1
2011 2
2012 3
2013 2
2014 2
2015 2
2016 5
2017 6
2018 6
2019 11
2020 16
2021 6
2022 14
2023 10
2024 8
2025 12
2026 2
Total 115
Download as CSV

Jeremy M. Testa publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy M. Testa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 88 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361 88
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeremy M. Testa D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy M. Testa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267 37
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeremy M. Testa is affiliated with the University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences in the United States. Their research spans extensively across Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a particular focus on Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

Their work primarily addresses topics related to marine and coastal ecosystems, marine biology and ecology research, ocean acidification effects and responses, marine bivalve and aquaculture studies, oceanographic and atmospheric processes, marine and coastal plant biology, and marine and fisheries research.

Frequent coauthors contributing to their research include Ming Li, Wei-Jun Cai, Chunqi Shen, C. L. S. Hodgkins, and Jianzhong Su.

Jeremy M. Testa has contributed publications to several leading scientific venues. The most frequent publication outlets comprise Limnology and Oceanography, Estuaries and Coasts, Water Research, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, and Frontiers in Marine Science.

Their recent research publications include:

  • Natural and Anthropogenic Drivers of Acidification in Large Estuaries (2020) published in Annual Review of Marine Science
  • Chesapeake Bay acidification buffered by spatially decoupled carbonate mineral cycling (2020) published in Nature Geoscience
  • Discerning effects of warming, sea level rise and nutrient management on long-term hypoxia trends in Chesapeake Bay (2020) published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay: Development of an empirical approach for water-quality management (2020) published in Water Research
  • Stressing over the Complexities of Multiple Stressors in Marine and Estuarine Systems (2022) published in Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Research

Best Publications

  • Temporal responses of coastal hypoxia to nutrient loading and physical controls

    W. M. Kemp;J. M. Testa;Daniel Conley;D. Gilbert

  • Biogeochemical Controls on Coastal Hypoxia

    Katja Fennel;Jeremy M Testa

  • Long-term nutrient reductions lead to the unprecedented recovery of a temperate coastal region

    Jonathan S. Lefcheck;Jonathan S. Lefcheck;Robert J. Orth;William C. Dennison;David J. Wilcox

  • The metabolism of aquatic ecosystems: history, applications, and future challenges

    Peter A. Staehr;Jeremy M. Testa;W. Michael Kemp;Jon J. Cole

  • Redox reactions and weak buffering capacity lead to acidification in the Chesapeake Bay

    Wei-Jun Cai;Wei-Jen Huang;Wei-Jen Huang;George W. Luther;Denis Pierrot

  • Natural and Anthropogenic Drivers of Acidification in Large Estuaries.

    Wei-Jun Cai;Richard A Feely;Jeremy M Testa;Ming Li

  • Quantifying the effects of nutrient loading on dissolved O2 cycling and hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay using a coupled hydrodynamic–biogeochemical model

    Jeremy M. Testa;Yun Li;Yun Li;Younjoo J. Lee;Younjoo J. Lee;Ming Li

  • What drives interannual variability of hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay: Climate forcing versus nutrient loading?

    Ming Li;Younjoo J. Lee;Jeremy M. Testa;Yun Li

  • Sediment flux modeling: Simulating nitrogen, phosphorus, and silica cycles

    Jeremy M. Testa;Damian C. Brady;Dominic M. Di Toro;Walter R. Boynton

  • Top-down control of phytoplankton by oysters in Chesapeake Bay, USA: Comment on Pomeroy et al. (2006)

    Roger I. E. Newell;W. Michael Kemp;James D. Hagy;Carl F. Cerco

  • Progress and Challenges in Coupled Hydrodynamic-Ecological Estuarine Modeling

    Neil K. Ganju;Mark J. Brush;Brenda Rashleigh;Alfredo L. Aretxabaleta

  • Submersed Aquatic Vegetation in Chesapeake Bay: Sentinel Species in a Changing World

    Robert J. Orth;William C. Dennison;Jonathan S. Lefcheck;Cassie Gurbisz

  • Oxygen and Nutrient Exchanges at the Sediment-Water Interface: a Global Synthesis and Critique of Estuarine and Coastal Data

    W. R. Boynton;M. A. C. Ceballos;E. M. Bailey;C. L. S. Hodgkins

  • Challenges associated with modeling low-oxygen waters in Chesapeake Bay: a multiple model comparison

    Isaac D. Irby;Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs;Carl T. Friedrichs;Aaron J. Bever

  • Hypoxia-induced shifts in nitrogen and phosphorus cycling in Chesapeake Bay

    Jeremy Mark Testa;W. Michael Kemp

  • Chesapeake Bay acidification buffered by spatially decoupled carbonate mineral cycling

    Jianzhong Su;Jianzhong Su;Wei-Jun Cai;Jean Brodeur;Baoshan Chen

  • Long-Term Changes in Water Quality and Productivity in the Patuxent River Estuary: 1985 to 2003

    Jeremy M. Testa;W. Michael Kemp;Walter R. Boynton;James D. Hagy

  • Sediment flux modeling: Calibration and application for coastal systems

    Damian C. Brady;Jeremy M. Testa;Dominic M. Di Toro;Walter R. Boynton

  • Dissolved iron cycling in the subterranean estuary of a coastal bay: Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts.

    Jeremy M. Testa;Matthew A. Charette;Edward R. Sholkovitz;Matt C. Allen

  • Discerning effects of warming, sea level rise and nutrient management on long-term hypoxia trends in Chesapeake Bay.

    Wenfei Ni;Ming Li;Jeremy M. Testa

  • Nutrient- and Climate-Induced Shifts in the Phenology of Linked Biogeochemical Cycles in a Temperate Estuary

    Jeremy M. Testa;Rebecca R. Murphy;Damian C. Brady;William M. Kemp

Frequent Co-Authors

Ming Li
Ming Li University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Wei-Jun Cai
Wei-Jun Cai University of Delaware
Walter R. Boynton
Walter R. Boynton University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Jeffrey C. Cornwell
Jeffrey C. Cornwell University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Neil K. Ganju
Neil K. Ganju United States Geological Survey
Dominic M. Di Toro
Dominic M. Di Toro University of Delaware
Jonathan S. Lefcheck
Jonathan S. Lefcheck Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
William C. Dennison
William C. Dennison University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs
Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs Virginia Institute of Marine Science
Donald E. Weller
Donald E. Weller Smithsonian Environmental Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an Environmental Sciences degree opens doors to various related fields that complement and expand career opportunities. For those interested in earth systems and natural processes, online geology degrees provide essential knowledge about the planet’s composition and geological changes, which are critical for environmental assessment and conservation efforts.

Geospatial technologies also play a vital role in environmental studies. Programs recognized as the best GIS programs in the US equip students with skills to analyze spatial data, helping organizations manage natural resources and address environmental challenges more effectively.

In addition to science and technology, leadership and policy are important for driving environmental change. Many professionals turn to easiest online MPA programs to gain public administration expertise and manage sustainability projects within governmental or nonprofit organizations.

Lastly, understanding societal impacts is crucial. Accredited programs like the accredited online bachelors in sociology help students study human behavior and social systems, providing insight into how communities interact with the environment and adapt to change.

Best Scientists Citing Jeremy M. Testa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles