World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter A. Staehr

Peter A. Staehr

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
44
Citations
6927
World Ranking
5105
National Ranking
73

Peter A. Staehr publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Staehr sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 102 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Peter A. Staehr D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Staehr sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter A. Staehr is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark, where their research focuses primarily on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields including ecology, oceanography, global and planetary change, management, monitoring, policy and law, as well as molecular biology.

Their research topics emphasize marine and coastal ecosystems, coral and marine ecosystems studies, environmental DNA in biodiversity studies, marine and coastal plant biology, marine and fisheries research, marine ecology and invasive species, and marine biology and ecology research.

Peter A. Staehr has contributed to several publications across various scientific venues. Notable frequent publication venues include:

  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Diversity
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Great Lakes Research

Recent significant papers authored or co-authored by them are:

  • Status and Trends in the Rate of Introduction of Marine Non-Indigenous Species in European Seas, 2022, Diversity
  • A Marine Biodiversity Observation Network for Genetic Monitoring of Hard-Bottom Communities (ARMS-MBON), 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Marine invasive alien species in Europe: 9 years after the IAS Regulation, 2023, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Leveraging the blue economy to transform marine forest restoration, 2022, Journal of Phycology
  • Capturing of organic carbon and nitrogen in eelgrass sediments of southern Scandinavia, 2023, Limnology and Oceanography

The scientist frequently collaborates with a group of co-authors, with whom they have produced several publications. These frequent co-authors include Sanjina Upadhyay Stæhr, Borut Mavrič, Matthias Obst, Stiig Markager, and Hans Jakobsen.

Best Publications

  • Reconciling the temperature dependence of respiration across timescales and ecosystem types

    Gabriel Yvon-Durocher;Gabriel Yvon-Durocher;Jane M. Caffrey;Alessandro Cescatti;Matteo Dossena

  • Decreasing resilience of kelp beds along a latitudinal temperature gradient: potential implications for a warmer future

    Thomas Wernberg;Thomas Wernberg;Mads S. Thomsen;Mads S. Thomsen;Fernando Tuya;Gary A. Kendrick

  • Lake metabolism and the diel oxygen technique: State of the science

    Peter A. Staehr;Peter A. Staehr;Darren Bade;Matthew C. Van de Bogert;Gregory R. Koch

  • Lake‐size dependency of wind shear and convection as controls on gas exchange

    Jordan S. Read;David P. Hamilton;Ankur R. Desai;Kevin C. Rose;Kevin C. Rose

  • Ecosystem respiration: Drivers of daily variability and background respiration in lakes around the globe

    Christopher T. Solomon;Denise A. Bruesewitz;David C. Richardson;Kevin C. Rose

  • The metabolism of aquatic ecosystems: history, applications, and future challenges

    Peter A. Staehr;Jeremy M. Testa;W. Michael Kemp;Jon J. Cole

  • Recovery of Danish Coastal Ecosystems After Reductions in Nutrient Loading: A Holistic Ecosystem Approach

    Bo Riemann;Jacob Carstensen;Karsten Dahl;Henrik Fossing

  • Invasion of Sargassum muticum in Limfjorden (Denmark) and its possible impact on the indigenous macroalgal community

    Peter A. Stæhr;Morten Foldager Pedersen;Mads S. Thomsen;Thomas Wernberg

  • Effects of weather-related episodic events in lakes: an analysis based on high frequency data.

    Eleanor Jennings;Stuart E. Jones;Lauri Arvola;Peter A. Staehr

  • PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES OF ECKLONIA RADIATA (LAMINARIALES) TO A LATITUDINAL GRADIENT IN OCEAN TEMPERATURE 1

    Peter Anton Stæhr;Thomas Wernberg

  • Seasonal changes in temperature and nutrient control of photosynthesis, respiration and growth of natural phytoplankton communities

    Peter A. Staehr;Kaj Sand-Jensen

  • Automatic High Frequency Monitoring for Improved Lake and Reservoir Management

    Rafael Marcé;Glen George;Glen George;Paola Buscarinu;Melania Deidda

  • Temporal dynamics and regulation of lake metabolism

    Peter A. Staehr;Kaj Sand-Jensen

  • Lake metabolism scales with lake morphometry and catchment conditions

    Peter A. Staehr;Peter A. Staehr;Lars Baastrup-Spohr;Kaj Sand-Jensen;Colin Stedmon

  • Diel surface temperature range scales with lake size

    R. Iestyn Woolway;R. Iestyn Woolway;Ian D. Jones;Stephen C. Maberly;Jon R. French

  • Seasonal acclimation in metabolism reduces light requirements of eelgrass (Zostera marina)

    Peter A. Staehr;Jens Borum

  • Seasonal Dynamics of CO2 Flux Across the Surface of Shallow Temperate Lakes

    Dennis Trolle;Peter A. Staehr;Thomas A. Davidson;Rikke Bjerring

  • Epibiota communities of the introduced and indigenous macroalgal relatives Sargassum muticum and Halidrys siliquosa in Limfjorden (Denmark)

    Thomas Wernberg;Thomas Wernberg;Mads S. Thomsen;Mads S. Thomsen;Peter A. Staehr;Peter A. Staehr;Morten F. Pedersen

  • Ecosystem metabolism in a stratified lake

    Peter A. Staehr;Jesper P. A. Christensen;Ryan D. Batt;Jordan S. Read

  • Drivers of metabolism and net heterotrophy in contrasting lakes

    Peter A. Staehr;Kaj Sand-Jensen;Ane L. Raun;Bertel Nilsson

  • Biomass dynamics of exotic Sargassum muticum and native Halidrys siliquosa in Limfjorden, Denmark—Implications of species replacements on turnover rates

    Morten Foldager Pedersen;Peter Anton Stæhr;Thomas Wernberg;Mads Solgaard Thomsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Mads S. Thomsen
Mads S. Thomsen University of Canterbury
Thomas Wernberg
Thomas Wernberg University of Western Australia
Kaj Sand-Jensen
Kaj Sand-Jensen University of Copenhagen
Stiig Markager
Stiig Markager Aarhus University
Morten Foldager Pedersen
Morten Foldager Pedersen Roskilde University
Dorte Krause-Jensen
Dorte Krause-Jensen Aarhus University
Hans Henrik Jakobsen
Hans Henrik Jakobsen Aarhus University
Jacob Carstensen
Jacob Carstensen Aarhus University
Donald C. Pierson
Donald C. Pierson Uppsala University
R. Iestyn Woolway
R. Iestyn Woolway Bangor University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens diverse doors for future careers. Many students now look to flexible online programs to pursue related fields or broaden their expertise. For example, those with a healthcare or biological science background can consider bridge programs that allow for rapid career growth.

If you are considering a fast-track route in nursing, a 6-month rn to bsn program can help you quickly move from an RN to a Bachelor of Science in Nursing. For those with an Associate’s in Nursing interested in specialized roles, an asn to np bridge program offers a direct pathway to becoming a Nurse Practitioner.

Switching to healthcare from a non-nursing background? Online direct entry msn programs allow non-nurses with science degrees to efficiently transition into clinical practice. If you are evaluating flexible learning environments, it's crucial to compare programs for cost and value. The best value nursing education online wgu resource is a good starting point to evaluate different universities and formats.

These programs offer science graduates, including those in Ecology and Evolution, new career paths that combine scientific inquiry with applied practice and patient care.

Best Scientists Citing Peter A. Staehr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles