World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cayelan C. Carey

Cayelan C. Carey

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 48 5526 5299 2020 1870 180 9031

Cayelan C. Carey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cayelan C. Carey between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cayelan C. Carey published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 14.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2023. 35 of the 292 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2023. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 35 publications 2023: 37 publications 2024: 34 publications 2025: 34 publications 2026: 1 publication
2007 2026

292 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cayelan C. Carey: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 2
2009 2
2010 1
2011 3
2012 5
2013 2
2014 8
2015 12
2016 9
2017 14
2018 20
2019 22
2020 30
2021 20
2022 35
2023 37
2024 34
2025 34
2026 1
Total 292
Download as CSV

Cayelan C. Carey publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cayelan C. Carey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 180 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444 180
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Cayelan C. Carey D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cayelan C. Carey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272 48
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Cayelan C. Carey is affiliated with Virginia Tech in the United States. Their research focuses predominantly within the field of Environmental Science, with significant contributions across various subfields including Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Water Science and Technology, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their work addresses topics such as Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics, Marine and Coastal Ecosystems, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Hydrological Forecasting Using AI, Species Distribution and Climate Change, and Research Data Management Practices.

Among their recent publications are the following papers:

  • Storm impacts on phytoplankton community dynamics in lakes, 2020, Global Change Biology
  • Cyanobacterial blooms in oligotrophic lakes: Shifting the high-nutrient paradigm, 2021, Freshwater Biology
  • A system of metrics for the assessment and improvement of aquatic ecosystem models, 2020, Environmental Modelling & Software
  • Predicting lake surface water phosphorus dynamics using process-guided machine learning, 2020, Ecological Modelling
  • Lake thermal structure drives interannual variability in summer anoxia dynamics in a eutrophic lake over 37 years, 2021, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Carey frequently collaborates with a recurring group of coauthors, including R. Quinn Thomas, Mary E. Lofton, Whitney M. Woelmer, Kathleen C. Weathers, and Tadhg N. Moore. These collaborations contribute to a substantial body of work across multiple publications.

Their research output is often published in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, Ecological Applications, Global Change Biology, and Ecological Modelling.

Best Publications

  • Eco-physiological adaptations that favour freshwater cyanobacteria in a changing climate

    Cayelan C. Carey;Bastiaan Willem Ibelings;Emily P. Hoffmann;David P. Hamilton

  • The interaction between climate warming and eutrophication to promote cyanobacteria is dependent on trophic state and varies among taxa

    Anna Rigosi;Cayelan C Carey;Bastiaan Willem Ibelings;Justin D Brookes

  • Ecology under lake ice

    Stephanie E. Hampton;Aaron W.E. Galloway;Stephen M. Powers;Ted Ozersky

  • Resilience to Blooms

    Justin D. Brookes;Cayelan C. Carey

  • Storm impacts on phytoplankton community dynamics in lakes

    Jason D. Stockwell;Jonathan P. Doubek;Rita Adrian;Rita Adrian;Orlane Anneville

  • Cyanobacteria as biological drivers of lake nitrogen and phosphorus cycling

    Kathryn L. Cottingham;Holly A. Ewing;Meredith L. Greer;Cayelan C. Carey

  • A General Lake Model (GLM 3.0) for linking with high-frequency sensor data from the Global Lake Ecological Observatory Network (GLEON)

    Matthew R. Hipsey;Louise C. Bruce;Casper Boon;Brendan Busch

  • Temperature Effects Explain Continental Scale Distribution of Cyanobacterial Toxins

    Evanthia Mantzouki;Miquel Lürling;Jutta Fastner;Lisette de Senerpont Domis

  • The under-ice microbiome of seasonally frozen lakes

    Stefan Bertilsson;Amy Burgin;Cayelan C. Carey;Samuel B. Fey

  • Patterns and drivers of deep chlorophyll maxima structure in 100 lakes: the relative importance of light and thermal stratification.

    Taylor H. Leach;Beatrix E. Beisner;Cayelan C. Carey;Patricia Pernica

  • Cyanobacterial blooms in oligotrophic lakes: Shifting the high-nutrient paradigm

    Kaitlin L. Reinl;Justin D. Brookes;Cayelan C. Carey;Ted D. Harris

  • Lake trophic status can be determined by the depth distribution of sediment phosphorus

    Cayelan C. Carey;Emil Rydin

  • A system of metrics for the assessment and improvement of aquatic ecosystem models

    Matthew R. Hipsey;Gideon Gal;George B. Arhonditsis;Cayelan C. Carey

  • First report of the successful operation of a side stream supersaturation hypolimnetic oxygenation system in a eutrophic, shallow reservoir.

    Alexandra B. Gerling;Richard G. Browne;Paul A. Gantzer;Mark H. Mobley

  • A Global Lake Ecological Observatory Network (GLEON) for synthesising high–frequency sensor data for validation of deterministic ecological models

    David P. Hamilton;Cayelan C. Carey;Lauri Arvola;Peter Arzberger

  • Predicting the resilience and recovery of aquatic systems: A framework for model evolution within environmental observatories

    Matthew R. Hipsey;David P. Hamilton;Paul C. Hanson;Cayelan C. Carey

  • THE GLOBAL LAKE ECOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY NETWORK (GLEON): THE EVOLUTION OF GRASSROOTS NETWORK SCIENCE

    Kathleen C. Weathers;Paul C. Hanson;Peter Arzberger;Jennifer Brentrup

  • Lake thermal structure drives interannual variability in summer anoxia dynamics in a eutrophic lake over 37 years

    Robert Ladwig;Paul C. Hanson;Hilary A. Dugan;Cayelan C. Carey

  • Advancing the research agenda for improving understanding of cyanobacteria in a future of global change.

    M. A. Burford;C. C. Carey;D. P. Hamilton;J. Huisman

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul C. Hanson
Paul C. Hanson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Kathleen C. Weathers
Kathleen C. Weathers Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Kathryn L. Cottingham
Kathryn L. Cottingham Dartmouth College
Hans-Peter Grossart
Hans-Peter Grossart University of Potsdam
John C. Little
John C. Little Virginia Tech
Jordan S. Read
Jordan S. Read United States Geological Survey
David P. Hamilton
David P. Hamilton Griffith University
Justin D. Brookes
Justin D. Brookes University of Adelaide
James A. Rusak
James A. Rusak Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Donald C. Pierson
Donald C. Pierson Uppsala University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to several related fields that offer diverse career opportunities. For students exploring alternatives or complementary areas, selecting the easiest degree to get can provide a flexible pathway to build foundational skills before specializing further.

For those interested in earth studies, the best online geology degree programs combine environmental knowledge with geological expertise, preparing graduates for roles in natural resource management and environmental consulting.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) plays a critical role in environmental data analysis. Pursuing one of the best GIS programs equips students with skills in spatial data handling, which is highly valued in environmental planning and sustainability initiatives.

For professionals aiming to influence policy and administration, the best online MPA programs offer accelerated paths to management roles in environmental agencies and nonprofits, bridging science with public service.

Best Scientists Citing Cayelan C. Carey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles