World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 63 10160 9383 4441 3993 433 15044

Federico Innocenti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Federico Innocenti between 1964 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Federico Innocenti published across 63 years, from 1964 to 2026, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 122 publications in 2023. 23 of the 551 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 122. Peak 122 publications in 2023. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 33 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 122 publications 2024: 48 publications 2025: 22 publications 2026: 1 publication
1964 2026

551 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Federico Innocenti: publications per year, 1964 to 2026
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 4
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 2
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 3
2000 4
2001 2
2002 6
2003 12
2004 12
2005 11
2006 10
2007 15
2008 8
2009 11
2010 10
2011 11
2012 19
2013 11
2014 27
2015 14
2016 33
2017 25
2018 14
2019 29
2020 15
2021 26
2022 17
2023 122
2024 48
2025 22
2026 1
Total 551
Download as CSV

Federico Innocenti publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Federico Innocenti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 427–436 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 433 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132 433
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Federico Innocenti D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Federico Innocenti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130 63
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Federico Innocenti is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Oncology, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their scholarly contributions emphasize key topics including Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Genetic factors in colorectal cancer, Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms, Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, Lung Cancer Research Studies, and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes.

Significant recent publications illustrate the scope of Federico Innocenti's work. These include:

  • ctDNA applications and integration in colorectal cancer: an NCI Colon and Rectal-Anal Task Forces whitepaper (2020), Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
  • Liposomal irinotecan (Onivyde): Exemplifying the benefits of nanotherapeutic drugs (2022), Cancer Science
  • Effect of First-Line Chemotherapy Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab on Overall Survival in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2020), UNC Libraries
  • All You Need to Know About DPYD Genetic Testing for Patients Treated With Fluorouracil and Capecitabine: A Practitioner-Friendly Guide (2020), JCO Oncology Practice
  • Genetic effects on liver chromatin accessibility identify disease regulatory variants (2021), The American Journal of Human Genetics

The scientist frequently collaborates with the following coauthors:

  • Alan P. Venook
  • Heinz-Josef Lenz
  • Fang-Shu Ou
  • Amy S. Etheridge
  • Richard M. Goldberg

Their research has been published extensively in various venues, with a particular concentration in:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • The Pharmacogenomics Journal
  • Cancer Research
  • JCO Oncology Practice

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive and Integrative Genomic Characterization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Adrian Ally;Miruna Balasundaram;Rebecca Carlsen;Eric Chuah

  • Genetic variants in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene predict the risk of severe neutropenia of irinotecan.

    Federico Innocenti;Samir D. Undevia;Lalitha Iyer;Pei Xian Chen

  • Gemcitabine Plus Bevacizumab Compared With Gemcitabine Plus Placebo in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Phase III Trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 80303)

    Hedy Lee Kindler;Donna Niedzwiecki;Donna Hollis;Susan Sutherland

  • Effect of First-Line Chemotherapy Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab on Overall Survival in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Alan P. Venook;Donna Niedzwiecki;Heinz Josef Lenz;Federico Innocenti

  • CALGB/SWOG 80405: Phase III trial of irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5-FU/leucovorin (mFOLFOX6) with bevacizumab (BV) or cetuximab (CET) for patients (pts) with KRAS wild-type (wt) untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum (MCRC).

    Alan P. Venook;Donna Niedzwiecki;Heinz-Josef Lenz;Federico Innocenti

  • Impact of primary (1{o}) tumor location on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Analysis of CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance).

    Alan P. Venook;Donna Niedzwiecki;Federico Innocenti;Briant Fruth

  • ctDNA applications and integration in colorectal cancer: an NCI Colon and Rectal-Anal Task Forces whitepaper.

    Arvind Dasari;Van K. Morris;Carmen J. Allegra;Chloe Atreya

  • Genome-wide association study identifies multiple susceptibility loci for pancreatic cancer

    Brian M. Wolpin;Cosmeri Rizzato;Peter Kraft;Charles Kooperberg

  • Predictive Role of the UGT1A1, UGT1A7, and UGT1A9 Genetic Variants and Their Haplotypes on the Outcome of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan

    Erika Cecchin;Federico Innocenti;Mario D'Andrea;Giuseppe Corona

  • Comprehensive Pharmacogenetic Analysis of Irinotecan Neutropenia and Pharmacokinetics

    Federico Innocenti;Deanna L. Kroetz;Erin Schuetz;M. Eileen Dolan

  • Mutational Analysis of Patients With Colorectal Cancer in CALGB/SWOG 80405 Identifies New Roles of Microsatellite Instability and Tumor Mutational Burden for Patient Outcome

    Federico Innocenti;Fang Shu Ou;Xueping Qu;Tyler J. Zemla

  • Identification, Replication, and Functional Fine-Mapping of Expression Quantitative Trait Loci in Primary Human Liver Tissue

    Federico Innocenti;Gregory M. Cooper;Ian B. Stanaway;Eric R. Gamazon

  • Impact of Consensus Molecular Subtype on Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance).

    Heinz Josef Lenz;Fang Shu Ou;Alan P. Venook;Howard S. Hochster

  • Ethnic Differences and Functional Analysis of MET Mutations in Lung Cancer

    Soundararajan Krishnaswamy;Rajani Kanteti;Jonathan S. Duke-Cohan;Sivakumar Loganathan

  • A Functional Common Polymorphism in a Sp1 Recognition Site of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Promoter

    Wanqing Liu;Federico Innocenti;Michael H. Wu;Apurva A. Desai

  • Variation in the glucose transporter gene SLC2A2 is associated with glycemic response to metformin.

    Kaixin Zhou;Sook Wah Yee;Eric L Seiser;Nienke van Leeuwen

  • Effect of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677C-->T polymorphism on toxicity and homocysteine plasma level after chronic methotrexate treatment of ovarian cancer patients.

    Giuseppe Toffoli;Antonio Russo;Federico Innocenti;Giuseppe Corona

  • A pharmacogenetic study of uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 in patients receiving morphine.

    Michael B. Sawyer;Michael B. Sawyer;Federico Innocenti;Federico Innocenti;Soma Das;Soma Das;Cheng Cheng;Cheng Cheng

  • Haplotype structure of the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 promoter in different ethnic groups.

    Federico Innocenti;Carrie Grimsley;Soma Das;Jacqueline Ramírez

  • Genotype-Driven Phase I Study of Irinotecan Administered in Combination With Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

    Giuseppe Toffoli;Erika Cecchin;Giampiero Gasparini;Mario D'andrea

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark J. Ratain
Mark J. Ratain University of Chicago
Alan P. Venook
Alan P. Venook University of California, San Francisco
Donna Niedzwiecki
Donna Niedzwiecki Duke University
Heinz-Josef Lenz
Heinz-Josef Lenz University of Southern California
Charles D. Blanke
Charles D. Blanke Oregon Health & Science University
Richard M. Goldberg
Richard M. Goldberg West Virginia University
Robert J. Mayer
Robert J. Mayer Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Monica M. Bertagnolli
Monica M. Bertagnolli Brigham and Women's Hospital
Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt
Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt Harvard University
Soma Das
Soma Das University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse and rewarding careers. For those interested in allied health, fitness, or rehabilitation, pursuing the best online kinesiology degree can be a great next step. Kinesiology applies biological principles to human movement and exercise sciences.

Healthcare remains a top destination for biology graduates. Many professionals are seeking advanced credentials with flexible schedules. Options like the fastest post master's pmhnp and the shortest online nurse practitioner program offer efficient pathways for nurses to specialize and increase their earning potential.

Nutrition is another growing field for science graduates. Earning an online nutritionist degree is now more accessible and affordable than ever. These degrees prepare students for roles in health promotion, wellness coaching, and clinical nutrition.

Exploring these related programs can help you expand your skills, qualify for new roles, and adapt to the evolving landscape of science and healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Federico Innocenti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles