World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 97 483 430 52 49 436 31968

Richard W. Titball publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard W. Titball between 1981 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard W. Titball published across 44 years, from 1981 to 2024, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2007. 1 of the 441 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2007. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 20 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 20 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 23 publications 2004: 27 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 33 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1981 2024

441 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard W. Titball: publications per year, 1981 to 2024
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 2
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 2
1990 2
1991 3
1992 3
1993 10
1994 5
1995 9
1996 20
1997 8
1998 10
1999 10
2000 20
2001 16
2002 18
2003 23
2004 27
2005 20
2006 22
2007 33
2008 12
2009 18
2010 11
2011 25
2012 10
2013 16
2014 15
2015 11
2016 13
2017 11
2018 8
2019 13
2020 7
2021 4
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 441
Download as CSV

Richard W. Titball publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard W. Titball sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 435–444 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 436 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33 436
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Richard W. Titball D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard W. Titball sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22 97
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard W. Titball is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Epidemiology. The main topics of their work involve Burkholderia infections and melioidosis.

The scientist has published research in several journals, with recent works appearing in leading venues such as Scientific Reports and Frontiers in Microbiology.

  • Functional redundancy of Burkholderia pseudomallei phospholipase C enzymes and their role in virulence (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • Identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei Genes Induced During Infection of Macrophages by Differential Fluorescence Induction (2020, Frontiers in Microbiology)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Richard W. Titball include:

  • Patoo Withatanung
  • Joanne M. Stevens
  • Sunee Korbsrisate
  • Varintip Srinon
  • Somjit Chaiwattanarungruengpaisan

Their research contributions cover studies of Burkholderia pseudomallei, particularly focusing on its pathogenic mechanisms and genetic responses during macrophage infection, topics relevant to understanding virulence and host-pathogen interactions.

Best Publications

  • Genome sequence of Yersinia pestis , the causative agent of plague

    J. Parkhill;B. W. Wren;N. R. Thomson;R. W. Titball

  • Genomic plasticity of the causative agent of melioidosis, Burkholderia pseudomallei

    Matthew T. G. Holden;Richard W. Titball;Richard W. Titball;Sharon J. Peacock;Sharon J. Peacock;Ana M. Cerdeño-Tárraga

  • Tularaemia: bioterrorism defence renews interest in Francisella tularensis

    Petra C.F. Oyston;Anders Sjöstedt;Richard W. Titball

  • Vaccine delivery using nanoparticles

    Anthony E. Gregory;Richard Titball;Diane Williamson

  • Bacterial phospholipases C.

    R W Titball

  • The complete genome sequence of Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia.

    Pär Larsson;Petra C F Oyston;Patrick Chain;May C Chu

  • Lipoproteins of Bacterial Pathogens

    A. Kovacs-Simon;R. W. Titball;S. L. Michell

  • ATP-binding cassette transporters are targets for the development of antibacterial vaccines and therapies.

    Helen S. Garmory;Richard W. Titball;Richard W. Titball

  • Rethinking our understanding of the pathogenesis of necrotic enteritis in chickens.

    Filip Van Immerseel;Julian Ian Rood;Robert J Moore;Robert J Moore;Richard W Titball

  • Skewed genomic variability in strains of the toxigenic bacterial pathogen, Clostridium perfringens

    Garry S.A. Myers;David A. Rasko;David A. Rasko;Jackie K. Cheung;Jacques Ravel

  • The V-antigen of Yersinia is surface exposed before target cell contact and involved in virulence protein translocation :

    Jonas Pettersson;Anna Holmström;Jim Hill;Sophie Leary

  • Recombinant V antigen protects mice against pneumonic and bubonic plague caused by F1-capsule-positive and -negative strains of Yersinia pestis.

    G. W. Anderson;S. E. C. Leary;E. D. Williamson;R. W. Titball

  • A new improved sub-unit vaccine for plague: the basis of protection

    E. Diane Williamson;Stephen M. Eley;Kate F. Griffin;Michael Green

  • Occurrence of Clostridium perfringens β2-toxin amongst animals, determined using genotyping and subtyping PCR assays

    H. S. Garmory;N. Chanter;N. P. French;D. Bueschel

  • Genome-Wide DNA Microarray Analysis of Francisella tularensis Strains Demonstrates Extensive Genetic Conservation within the Species but Identifies Regions That Are Unique to the Highly Virulent F. tularensis subsp. tularensis

    Martien Broekhuijsen;Pär Larsson;Anders Johansson;Anders Johansson;Mona Byström

  • Active immunization with recombinant V antigen from Yersinia pestis protects mice against plague.

    S. E. C. Leary;E. D. Williamson;K. F. Griffin;P. Russell

  • The response regulator PhoP is important for survival under conditions of macrophage-induced stress and virulence in Yersinia pestis.

    Petra C. F. Oyston;Nick Dorrell;Kerstin Williams;Shu-Rui Li

  • A comparison of Plague vaccine, USP and EV76 vaccine induced protection against Yersinia pestis in a murine model.

    P. Russell;S.M. Eley;S.E. Hibbs;R.J. Manchee

  • Vaccination against bubonic and pneumonic plague.

    Richard W Titball;E.Diane Williamson

  • Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of the alpha-toxin (phospholipase C) of Clostridium perfringens.

    R. W. Titball;S. E. C. Hunter;K. L. Martin;B. C. Morris

Frequent Co-Authors

Petra C. F. Oyston
Petra C. F. Oyston Defence Science and Technology Laboratory
Brendan W. Wren
Brendan W. Wren London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Gregory J. Bancroft
Gregory J. Bancroft London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Anders Sjöstedt
Anders Sjöstedt Umeå University
James M. Hill
James M. Hill Louisiana State University
Philip L. Felgner
Philip L. Felgner University of California, Irvine
David J. Studholme
David J. Studholme University of Exeter
Andrey V. Karlyshev
Andrey V. Karlyshev Kingston University
Patrick Tan
Patrick Tan Duke NUS Graduate Medical School
Åke Forsberg
Åke Forsberg Umeå University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in microbiology, expanding skills into health information and coding can open additional career doors. Earning a professional coder certification offers a pathway to work in healthcare documentation and medical billing, with competitive salaries and growing demand.

Health information management also presents promising prospects. Understanding data management within clinical settings is key, and entry into this field often starts with knowledge of salary and job requirements. Exploring health information management salary entry-level data helps guide decisions on education and career planning.

Choosing the right program is critical. Prospective students should consider accredited options to ensure quality education and eligibility for certification exams. Programs like the best online cahiim accredited health information management degree programs provide reputable online learning tailored to these industries.

For those seeking quicker routes, fast online medical billing and coding certification programs offer accelerated education paths that can lead to immediate employment opportunities, making them attractive for students balancing multiple commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Richard W. Titball

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles