World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
111
Citations
42649
World Ranking
5356
National Ranking
25

Helmut Gadner publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helmut Gadner sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 549 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Helmut Gadner D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helmut Gadner sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Helmut Gadner is affiliated with St Anna Children's Hospital in Austria and has contributed to the field of medicine with a focus on physiology, surgery, and infectious diseases. Their scholarly work spans several topics, including histiocytic disorders and treatments, vascular malformations and hemangiomas, as well as Parvovirus B19 infection studies.

The researcher has published in notable venues such as The Journal of Pediatrics. One example of their recent work is the paper titled Additive Prognostic Impact of Gastrointestinal Involvement in Severe Multisystem Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis, published in 2021 in The Journal of Pediatrics.

Helmut Gadner regularly collaborates with several coauthors, including Milen Minkov, Ulrike Pötschger, Nirav Thacker, Itziar Astigarraga, and Jorge Braier. These collaborations reflect a multidisciplinary approach within their areas of study.

Their research contributions can be detailed as follows:

  • Main fields of study: Medicine
  • Subfields of study: Physiology, Surgery, Infectious Diseases
  • Main topics of work: Histiocytic Disorders and Treatments, Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas, Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies
  • Publication venues: The Journal of Pediatrics
  • Recent papers: "Additive Prognostic Impact of Gastrointestinal Involvement in Severe Multisystem Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis" (2021, The Journal of Pediatrics)
  • Frequent co-authors: Milen Minkov, Ulrike Pötschger, Nirav Thacker, Itziar Astigarraga, Jorge Braier

Best Publications

  • Prognostic value of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood

    Jacques Jm van Dongen;Taku Seriu;E Renate Panzer-Grümayer;Andrea Biondi

  • Treatment of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with HLH-94 immunochemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation.

    Jan-Inge Henter;AnnaCarin Samuelsson-Horne;Maurizio Aricò;R Maarten Egeler

  • Contemporary classification of histiocytic disorders

    Blaise E. Favara;Alfred C. Feller;Macro Pauli;Elaine S. Jaffe

  • Primary Metastatic Osteosarcoma: Presentation and Outcome of Patients Treated on Neoadjuvant Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group Protocols

    Leo Kager;Andreas Zoubek;Ulrike Pötschger;Ulrike Kastner

  • Improved outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia despite reduced use of anthracyclines and cranial radiotherapy: results of trial ALL-BFM 90. German-Austrian-Swiss ALL-BFM Study Group.

    Martin Schrappe;Alfred Reiter;Wolf-Dieter Ludwig;Jochen Harbott

  • MIC2 is a specific marker for Ewing's sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors. Evidence for a common histogenesis of Ewing's sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors from MIC2 expression and specific chromosome aberration.

    Inge M. Ambros;Peter F. Ambros;Sabine Strehl;Heinrich Kovar

  • Chemoimmunotherapy for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: long-term results of the HLH-94 treatment protocol.

    Helena Trottestam;AnnaCarin Horne;Maurizio Aricò;R. Maarten Egeler

  • Risk-adjusted therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia can decrease treatment burden and improve survival: treatment results of 2169 unselected pediatric and adolescent patients enrolled in the trial ALL-BFM 95

    Anja Möricke;Alfred Reiter;Martin Zimmermann;Helmut Gadner

  • Long-term results of four consecutive trials in childhood ALL performed by the ALL-BFM study group from 1981 to 1995. Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster.

    M Schrappe;A Reiter;M Zimmermann;J Harbott

  • Long-term results of five consecutive trials in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia performed by the ALL-BFM study group from 1981 to 2000

    A Möricke;M Zimmermann;A Reiter;G Henze

  • HLH‐94: A treatment protocol for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

    J I Henter;M Aricò;R M Egeler;G Elinder

  • A randomized trial of treatment for multisystem Langerhans' cell histiocytosis.

    Helmut Gadner;Nicole Grois;Maurizio Arico;Valerie Broadbent

  • Multidisciplinary treatment of primary Ewing's sarcoma of bone. A 6-year experience of a European Cooperative Trial.

    Herbert Jürgens;Ulrich Exner;Helmut Gadner;Dieter Harms

  • Late MRD response determines relapse risk overall and in subsets of childhood T-cell ALL: results of the AIEOP-BFM-ALL 2000 study

    Martin Schrappe;Maria Grazia Valsecchi;Claus R. Bartram;André Schrauder

  • Minimal residual disease-directed risk stratification using real-time quantitative PCR analysis of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements in the international multicenter trial AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    T Flohr;T Flohr;A Schrauder;G Cazzaniga;R Panzer-Grümayer

  • Localized Ewing Tumor of Bone: Final Results of the Cooperative Ewing’s Sarcoma Study CESS 86

    M. Paulussen;S. Ahrens;J. Dunst;W. Winkelmann

  • Therapy prolongation improves outcome in multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis

    Helmut Gadner;Milen Minkov;Nicole Grois;Ulrike Pötschger

  • Prednisone response is the strongest predictor of treatment outcome in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    Michael Dördelmann;Alfred Reiter;Arndt Borkhardt;Wolf-Dieter Ludwig

  • Intensive ALL-type therapy without local radiotherapy provides a 90% event-free survival for children with T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma: a BFM group report.

    Alfred Reiter;Martin Schrappe;Wolf-Dieter Ludwig;Markus Tiemann

  • Prognostic significance and modalities of flow cytometric minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Michael N. Dworzak;Gertraud Fröschl;Dieter Printz;Georg Mann

Frequent Co-Authors

Oskar A. Haas
Oskar A. Haas Medical University of Vienna
Peter F. Ambros
Peter F. Ambros St Anna Children's Hospital
Michael Dworzak
Michael Dworzak Medical University of Vienna
Gerhard Fritsch
Gerhard Fritsch Medical University of Vienna
Thomas Lion
Thomas Lion Medical University of Vienna
Heinrich Kovar
Heinrich Kovar St Anna Children's Hospital
Alfred Reiter
Alfred Reiter University of Giessen
Christoph Peters
Christoph Peters University of Freiburg
Martin Schrappe
Martin Schrappe Kiel University
Günter Henze
Günter Henze Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Medicine in the USA, you may want to explore related degrees and alternative career pathways that are available online. Many healthcare roles now offer flexible education options, making it easier than ever to start your journey or advance your career from home.

For those considering roles in pharmaceutical care, enrolling in accredited pharmacy school online can lead to rewarding positions in clinical or retail pharmacy settings. If you’re interested in healthcare data and digital records, health information technology programs online provide essential skills for managing medical information efficiently and securely.

Those looking at administrative roles may opt for a certification in medical coding and billing. Understanding the medical coding certification cost can help you plan a fast, affordable route into this important field. Aspiring advanced practice nurses should explore cheap online fnp programs to gain the credentials needed for specialized nursing roles.

These online degree and certification options offer more accessible pathways to a healthcare career, allowing for greater flexibility and affordability while you prepare to make an impact in the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Helmut Gadner

Trending Scientists