World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 111 5355 25 549 42649

Helmut Gadner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Helmut Gadner between 1974 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Helmut Gadner published across 44 years, from 1974 to 2017, averaging 12.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2001. 2 of the 558 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2001. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 5 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 11 publications 1987: 12 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 16 publications 1992: 21 publications 1993: 19 publications 1994: 30 publications 1995: 30 publications 1996: 26 publications 1997: 24 publications 1998: 19 publications 1999: 31 publications 2000: 24 publications 2001: 34 publications 2002: 24 publications 2003: 26 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 27 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 4 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication
1974 2017

558 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Helmut Gadner: publications per year, 1974 to 2017
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 5
1983 2
1984 3
1985 6
1986 11
1987 12
1988 5
1989 10
1990 12
1991 16
1992 21
1993 19
1994 30
1995 30
1996 26
1997 24
1998 19
1999 31
2000 24
2001 34
2002 24
2003 26
2004 21
2005 27
2006 19
2007 21
2008 21
2009 9
2010 11
2011 4
2012 10
2013 14
2014 1
2015 4
2016 1
2017 1
Total 558
Download as CSV

Helmut Gadner publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helmut Gadner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 549 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 549
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Helmut Gadner D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helmut Gadner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429 111
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Helmut Gadner is affiliated with St Anna Children's Hospital in Austria and has contributed to the field of medicine with a focus on physiology, surgery, and infectious diseases. Their scholarly work spans several topics, including histiocytic disorders and treatments, vascular malformations and hemangiomas, as well as Parvovirus B19 infection studies.

The researcher has published in notable venues such as The Journal of Pediatrics. One example of their recent work is the paper titled Additive Prognostic Impact of Gastrointestinal Involvement in Severe Multisystem Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis, published in 2021 in The Journal of Pediatrics.

Helmut Gadner regularly collaborates with several coauthors, including Milen Minkov, Ulrike Pötschger, Nirav Thacker, Itziar Astigarraga, and Jorge Braier. These collaborations reflect a multidisciplinary approach within their areas of study.

Their research contributions can be detailed as follows:

  • Main fields of study: Medicine
  • Subfields of study: Physiology, Surgery, Infectious Diseases
  • Main topics of work: Histiocytic Disorders and Treatments, Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas, Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies
  • Publication venues: The Journal of Pediatrics
  • Recent papers: "Additive Prognostic Impact of Gastrointestinal Involvement in Severe Multisystem Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis" (2021, The Journal of Pediatrics)
  • Frequent co-authors: Milen Minkov, Ulrike Pötschger, Nirav Thacker, Itziar Astigarraga, Jorge Braier

Best Publications

  • Prognostic value of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood

    Jacques Jm van Dongen;Taku Seriu;E Renate Panzer-Grümayer;Andrea Biondi

  • Treatment of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with HLH-94 immunochemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation.

    Jan-Inge Henter;AnnaCarin Samuelsson-Horne;Maurizio Aricò;R Maarten Egeler

  • Contemporary classification of histiocytic disorders

    Blaise E. Favara;Alfred C. Feller;Macro Pauli;Elaine S. Jaffe

  • Primary Metastatic Osteosarcoma: Presentation and Outcome of Patients Treated on Neoadjuvant Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group Protocols

    Leo Kager;Andreas Zoubek;Ulrike Pötschger;Ulrike Kastner

  • Improved outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia despite reduced use of anthracyclines and cranial radiotherapy: results of trial ALL-BFM 90. German-Austrian-Swiss ALL-BFM Study Group.

    Martin Schrappe;Alfred Reiter;Wolf-Dieter Ludwig;Jochen Harbott

  • MIC2 is a specific marker for Ewing's sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors. Evidence for a common histogenesis of Ewing's sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors from MIC2 expression and specific chromosome aberration.

    Inge M. Ambros;Peter F. Ambros;Sabine Strehl;Heinrich Kovar

  • Chemoimmunotherapy for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: long-term results of the HLH-94 treatment protocol.

    Helena Trottestam;AnnaCarin Horne;Maurizio Aricò;R. Maarten Egeler

  • Risk-adjusted therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia can decrease treatment burden and improve survival: treatment results of 2169 unselected pediatric and adolescent patients enrolled in the trial ALL-BFM 95

    Anja Möricke;Alfred Reiter;Martin Zimmermann;Helmut Gadner

  • Long-term results of four consecutive trials in childhood ALL performed by the ALL-BFM study group from 1981 to 1995. Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster.

    M Schrappe;A Reiter;M Zimmermann;J Harbott

  • Long-term results of five consecutive trials in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia performed by the ALL-BFM study group from 1981 to 2000

    A Möricke;M Zimmermann;A Reiter;G Henze

  • HLH‐94: A treatment protocol for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

    J I Henter;M Aricò;R M Egeler;G Elinder

  • A randomized trial of treatment for multisystem Langerhans' cell histiocytosis.

    Helmut Gadner;Nicole Grois;Maurizio Arico;Valerie Broadbent

  • Multidisciplinary treatment of primary Ewing's sarcoma of bone. A 6-year experience of a European Cooperative Trial.

    Herbert Jürgens;Ulrich Exner;Helmut Gadner;Dieter Harms

  • Late MRD response determines relapse risk overall and in subsets of childhood T-cell ALL: results of the AIEOP-BFM-ALL 2000 study

    Martin Schrappe;Maria Grazia Valsecchi;Claus R. Bartram;André Schrauder

  • Minimal residual disease-directed risk stratification using real-time quantitative PCR analysis of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements in the international multicenter trial AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    T Flohr;T Flohr;A Schrauder;G Cazzaniga;R Panzer-Grümayer

  • Localized Ewing Tumor of Bone: Final Results of the Cooperative Ewing’s Sarcoma Study CESS 86

    M. Paulussen;S. Ahrens;J. Dunst;W. Winkelmann

  • Therapy prolongation improves outcome in multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis

    Helmut Gadner;Milen Minkov;Nicole Grois;Ulrike Pötschger

  • Prednisone response is the strongest predictor of treatment outcome in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    Michael Dördelmann;Alfred Reiter;Arndt Borkhardt;Wolf-Dieter Ludwig

  • Intensive ALL-type therapy without local radiotherapy provides a 90% event-free survival for children with T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma: a BFM group report.

    Alfred Reiter;Martin Schrappe;Wolf-Dieter Ludwig;Markus Tiemann

  • Prognostic significance and modalities of flow cytometric minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Michael N. Dworzak;Gertraud Fröschl;Dieter Printz;Georg Mann

Frequent Co-Authors

Oskar A. Haas
Oskar A. Haas Medical University of Vienna
Peter F. Ambros
Peter F. Ambros St Anna Children's Hospital
Michael Dworzak
Michael Dworzak Medical University of Vienna
Gerhard Fritsch
Gerhard Fritsch Medical University of Vienna
Thomas Lion
Thomas Lion Medical University of Vienna
Heinrich Kovar
Heinrich Kovar St Anna Children's Hospital
Alfred Reiter
Alfred Reiter University of Giessen
Christoph Peters
Christoph Peters University of Freiburg
Martin Schrappe
Martin Schrappe Kiel University
Günter Henze
Günter Henze Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Medicine in the USA, you may want to explore related degrees and alternative career pathways that are available online. Many healthcare roles now offer flexible education options, making it easier than ever to start your journey or advance your career from home.

For those considering roles in pharmaceutical care, enrolling in accredited pharmacy school online can lead to rewarding positions in clinical or retail pharmacy settings. If you’re interested in healthcare data and digital records, health information technology programs online provide essential skills for managing medical information efficiently and securely.

Those looking at administrative roles may opt for a certification in medical coding and billing. Understanding the medical coding certification cost can help you plan a fast, affordable route into this important field. Aspiring advanced practice nurses should explore cheap online fnp programs to gain the credentials needed for specialized nursing roles.

These online degree and certification options offer more accessible pathways to a healthcare career, allowing for greater flexibility and affordability while you prepare to make an impact in the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Helmut Gadner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles