World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kjeld Schmiegelow

Kjeld Schmiegelow

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 87 13600 12798 149 141 630 29005

Kjeld Schmiegelow publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kjeld Schmiegelow between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kjeld Schmiegelow published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 20.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 81 publications in 2023. 119 of the 807 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 81. Peak 81 publications in 2023. 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 50 publications 2018: 39 publications 2019: 38 publications 2020: 50 publications 2021: 57 publications 2022: 58 publications 2023: 81 publications 2024: 77 publications 2025: 42 publications
1986 2025

807 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kjeld Schmiegelow: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 2
1987 0
1988 2
1989 3
1990 4
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 3
1995 4
1996 3
1997 4
1998 5
1999 5
2000 7
2001 11
2002 10
2003 17
2004 13
2005 10
2006 16
2007 8
2008 13
2009 19
2010 16
2011 26
2012 22
2013 21
2014 20
2015 19
2016 30
2017 50
2018 39
2019 38
2020 50
2021 57
2022 58
2023 81
2024 77
2025 42
Total 807
Download as CSV

Kjeld Schmiegelow publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kjeld Schmiegelow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 621–640 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 630 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386 630
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Kjeld Schmiegelow D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kjeld Schmiegelow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 87
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kjeld Schmiegelow is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly in the fields of pediatrics and hematology. Their research primarily spans the domain of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and broader pediatric cancer studies.

Their research output encompasses several key topics including:

  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research

Schmiegelow's work is situated within the main field of Medicine, with significant focus on subfields including Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, Molecular Biology, and Hematology.

The scientist has published in a variety of frequent venues such as:

  • Blood
  • Leukemia
  • Pediatric Blood & Cancer
  • British Journal of Haematology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Recent publications by Kjeld Schmiegelow include:

  • "Flash survey on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infections in paediatric patients on anticancer treatment," 2020, European Journal of Cancer
  • "Maintenance therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: basic science and clinical translations," 2022, Leukemia
  • "Nationwide germline whole genome sequencing of 198 consecutive pediatric cancer patients reveals a high incidence of cancer prone syndromes," 2020, PLoS Genetics
  • "Back to school with telepresence robot technology: A qualitative pilot study about how telepresence robots help school-aged children and adolescents with cancer to remain socially and academically connected with their school classes during treatment," 2020, Nursing Open
  • "Central nervous system involvement in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: challenges and solutions," 2022, Leukemia

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Mats Heyman
  • Birgitte Klug Albertsen
  • René Mathiasen
  • Karin Wadt
  • Ulrik Kristoffer Stoltze

Best Publications

  • Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Progress Through Collaboration

    Ching Hon Pui;Jun J. Yang;Stephen P. Hunger;Rob Pieters

  • Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for thiopurine methyltransferase genotype and thiopurine dosing.

    Relling Mv;Gardner Ee;Sandborn Wj;Schmiegelow K

  • Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guidelines for Thiopurine Methyltransferase Genotype and Thiopurine Dosing: 2013 Update

    M V Relling;E E Gardner;W J Sandborn;K Schmiegelow

  • Human thiopurine methyltransferase pharmacogenetics: Gene sequence polymorphisms

    Diane Otterness;Carol Szumlanski;Lynne Lennard;Bjørg Klemetsdal

  • Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for Thiopurine Dosing Based on TPMT and NUDT15 Genotypes: 2018 Update

    Mary V. Relling;Matthias Schwab;Matthias Schwab;Michelle Whirl-Carrillo;Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz

  • Reduced Ovarian Function in Long-Term Survivors of Radiation- and Chemotherapy-Treated Childhood Cancer

    Elisabeth C. Larsen;Jørn Müller;Kjeld Schmiegelow;Catherine Rechnitzer

  • Long-term results of NOPHO ALL-92 and ALL-2000 studies of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    K Schmiegelow;E Forestier;M Hellebostad;M Heyman

  • Distinct patterns of hematopoietic stem cell involvement in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Anders Castor;Lars Nilsson;Ingbritt Astrand-Grundström;Miranda Buitenhuis

  • Results of NOPHO ALL2008 treatment for patients aged 1-45 years with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    N. Toft;N. Toft;H. Birgens;J. Abrahamsson;L. Griskevicius

  • NUDT15 polymorphisms alter thiopurine metabolism and hematopoietic toxicity

    Takaya Moriyama;Takaya Moriyama;Rina Nishii;Rina Nishii;Virginia Perez-Andreu;Wenjian Yang

  • Standardized MRD quantification in European ALL trials: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on MRD assessment in Kiel, Germany, 18–20 September 2008

    M. Bruggemann;A. Schrauder;T. Raff;H. Pfeifer

  • Genome-wide signatures of differential DNA methylation in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Jessica Nordlund;Christofer L Bäcklin;Per Wahlberg;Stephan Busche

  • Improving outcome through two decades in childhood ALL in the Nordic countries: the impact of high-dose methotrexate in the reduction of CNS irradiation

    G Gustafsson;K Schmiegelow;E Forestier;N Clausen

  • Relation between age, immunophenotype and in vitro drug resistance in 395 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia--implications for treatment of infants.

    R. Pieters;M. L. Den Boer;M. Durian;G. Janka

  • Advances in individual prediction of methotrexate toxicity: a review

    Kjeld Schmiegelow

  • Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children with Down syndrome: a retrospective analysis from the Ponte di Legno study group

    Trudy D. Buitenkamp;Shai Izraeli;Martin Zimmermann;Erik Forestier

  • Birth Weight as a Risk Factor for Childhood Leukemia: A Meta-Analysis of 18 Epidemiologic Studies

    Lisa Lyngsie Hjalgrim;Tine Westergaard;Klaus Rostgaard;Kjeld Schmiegelow

  • Use of Azathioprine and the Risk of Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

    Björn Pasternak;Henrik Svanström;Kjeld Schmiegelow;Tine Jess

  • Cognitive deficits in long-term survivors of childhood brain tumors: Identification of predictive factors

    Tonny Solveig Reimers;Susanne Ehrenfels;Erik Lykke Mortensen;Marianne Schmiegelow

  • Consensus definitions of 14 severe acute toxic effects for childhood lymphoblastic leukaemia treatment: a Delphi consensus

    Kjeld Schmiegelow;Kjeld Schmiegelow;Andishe Attarbaschi;Andishe Attarbaschi;Shlomit Barzilai;Gabriele Escherich

Frequent Co-Authors

Henrik Hjalgrim
Henrik Hjalgrim Statens Serum Institut
Hans O. Madsen
Hans O. Madsen Copenhagen University Hospital
Christoffer Johansen
Christoffer Johansen Copenhagen University Hospital
Rob Pieters
Rob Pieters Princess Máxima Center
Henrik Hasle
Henrik Hasle Aarhus University Hospital
Martin Schrappe
Martin Schrappe Kiel University
Martin Stanulla
Martin Stanulla Hannover Medical School
Lars P. Ryder
Lars P. Ryder University of Copenhagen
Ching-Hon Pui
Ching-Hon Pui St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Stephen P. Hunger
Stephen P. Hunger University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Medicine in the USA opens up a variety of related fields that can be pursued through flexible online study. One popular option is the online master of health administration, which prepares graduates for leadership roles within healthcare organizations.

Looking for affordability and flexibility? A master's in healthcare administration online can offer an accessible pathway to healthcare management without putting your career on hold. These programs focus on essential business, policy, and operational skills needed in today's health systems.

For those aiming for advanced clinical roles, cheap online dnp programs provide a route to the highest level of nursing practice. Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degrees prepare nurses for leadership, advanced patient care, and specialized positions.

Pharmacy is another growing area. Accredited online pharmacy programs allow future pharmacists to gain crucial clinical knowledge and credentials with the convenience of distance education.

Each of these degrees supports different career goals within the wider healthcare sector, providing flexible education options for medical professionals or those seeking new directions within healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Kjeld Schmiegelow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles