World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
47
Citations
8203
World Ranking
3423
National Ranking
1646

Carl de Moor publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carl de Moor sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 90 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Carl de Moor D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carl de Moor sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carl de Moor is affiliated with Boston Children's Hospital in the United States and has contributed extensively to medical research, with a focus primarily on multiple sclerosis and related neurological conditions. Their work spans various subfields including pathology and forensic medicine, statistics and probability, neurology, psychiatry, and mental health.

De Moor's research is mostly concentrated within medicine, encompassing 82 identified publications. Their contributions are distributed across significant domains such as multiple sclerosis research studies, health systems and economic evaluations, polyomavirus and related diseases, dementia and cognitive impairment, causal inference techniques, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia research.

The scientist has published frequently in notable venues, including:

  • Neurology
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental Translational and Clinical
  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

Carl de Moor's recent papers illustrate ongoing research in multiple sclerosis and its clinical implications:

  • "COVID-19 in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Associations with Disease-Modifying Therapies" (2021, CNS Drugs)
  • "Harnessing Real-World Data to Inform Decision-Making: Multiple Sclerosis Partners Advancing Technology and Health Solutions (MS PATHS)" (2020, Frontiers in Neurology)
  • "Temporal profile of serum neurofilament light in multiple sclerosis: Implications for patient monitoring" (2020, Multiple Sclerosis Journal)
  • "Recommendations for the use of propensity score methods in multiple sclerosis research" (2022, Multiple Sclerosis Journal)
  • "Temporal Relationship Between Serum Neurofilament Light Chain and Radiologic Disease Activity in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis" (2024, Neurology)

Collaborations have played an important role in their research efforts. Frequent co-authors include James R. Williams, Elizabeth Fisher, Richard A. Rudick, Fabio Pellegrini, and Irene Koulinska.

Best Publications

  • Availability, Accessibility, and Preferences for Fruit, 100% Fruit Juice, and Vegetables Influence Children's Dietary Behavior

    Karen Weber Cullen;Tom Baranowski;Emiel Owens;Tara Marsh

  • Breaking Bad News About Cancer: Patients’ Preferences for Communication

    Patricia A. Parker;Walter F. Baile;Carl de Moor;Renato Lenzi

  • Depression, anxiety, and quality of life in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

    Diane Bodurka-Bevers;Karen Basen-Engquist;Cindy L. Carmack;Mary A. Fitzgerald

  • Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting—incidence and impact on patient quality of life at community oncology settings

    Lorenzo Cohen;Carl A. de Moor;Peter Eisenberg;Eileen E. Ming

  • The NIH MRI study of normal brain development: performance of a population based sample of healthy children aged 6 to 18 years on a neuropsychological battery.

    Deborah P Waber;Carl De Moor;Peter W Forbes;C Robert Almli

  • First year after head and neck cancer: quality of life.

    Ellen R. Gritz;Cindy L. Carmack;Carl de Moor;Anne Coscarelli

  • Children’s meal patterns have changed over a 21-year period: the Bogalusa heart study

    Theresa A. Nicklas;Miriam Morales;A. Linares;Su-Jau Yang

  • Effect of a la carte and snack bar foods at school on children's lunchtime intake of fruits and vegetables.

    Karen Weber Cullen;Jill Eagan;Tom Baranowski;Emiel Owens

  • Socioenvironmental influences on children's fruit, juice and vegetable consumption as reported by parents: reliability and validity of measures

    Karen Weber Cullen;Tom Baranowski;Latroy Rittenberry;Chris Cosart

  • Validation of the modified Fagerström tolerance questionnaire with salivary cotinine among adolescents.

    Alexander V Prokhorov;Carl De Moor;Unto E Pallonen;Karen Suchanek Hudmon

  • The food intake recording software system is valid among fourth-grade children.

    Tom Baranowski;Noemi Islam;Janice Baranowski;Karen W. Cullen

  • A pilot study of the effects of expressive writing on psychological and behavioral adjustment in patients enrolled in a Phase II trial of vaccine therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

    Carl de Moor;Janet Sterner;Martica Hall;Carla Warneke

  • Predictors of susceptibility to smoking and ever smoking: a longitudinal study in a triethnic sample of adolescents.

    Ellen R. Gritz;Alexander V. Prokhorov;Karen Suchanek Hudmon;Mary Mullin Jones

  • bcl-2 and apoptosis in lymph node positive breast carcinoma†

    Melora D. Berardo;Richard M. Elledge;Carl de Moor;Gary M. Clark

  • Differences in cancer-risk-related behaviors in Latino and Anglo adults.

    John P. Elder;Felipe G. Castro;Carl de Moor;Joni Mayer

  • Concomitant use of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco: prevalence, correlates, and predictors of tobacco cessation.

    David W. Wetter;Jennifer B. McClure;Carl de Moor;Ludmila Cofta-Gunn

  • Aerobic fitness and leisure physical activity as moderators of the stress-illness relation.

    Cindy Lynn Carmack;Edwin Boudreaux;Marta Amaral-Melendez;Phillip J. Brantley;Phillip J. Brantley

  • A Momentary Sampling Study of the Affective Experience Following Coital Events in Adolescents

    Lydia A. Shrier;Lydia A. Shrier;Mei-Chiung Shih;Mei-Chiung Shih;Laura Hacker;Carl de Moor;Carl de Moor

  • The association between treatment-specific optimism and depressive symptomatology in patients enrolled in a Phase I cancer clinical trial

    Lorenzo Cohen;Carl de Moor;J D O Robert Amato

  • Intake of soft drinks, fruit-flavored beverages, and fruits and vegetables by children in grades 4 through 6.

    Karen Weber Cullen;Danielle M. Ash;Carla Warneke;Carl de Moor

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander V. Prokhorov
Alexander V. Prokhorov The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Tom Baranowski
Tom Baranowski Baylor College of Medicine
Ellen R. Gritz
Ellen R. Gritz The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
David W. Wetter
David W. Wetter University of Utah
John P. Elder
John P. Elder San Diego State University
James F. Sallis
James F. Sallis University of California, San Diego
Karen M. Emmons
Karen M. Emmons Harvard University
Steven H. Kelder
Steven H. Kelder The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Melbourne F. Hovell
Melbourne F. Hovell San Diego State University
Phillip J. Brantley
Phillip J. Brantley Pennington Biomedical Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options in Social Sciences and Humanities can expand your career possibilities while providing the flexibility to balance work, family, and studies. Many students opt for masters in social work accelerated programs to quickly qualify for impactful roles in social work, counseling, or non-profit sectors. These programs typically offer faster timelines without sacrificing rigorous education standards.

Those interested in psychological services may consider the fastest psychology degree options, which help students graduate sooner and enter the workforce or pursue further study with less delay. Fast-tracked psychology degrees online often include the same coursework and practicum requirements as traditional formats.

Pursuing counseling careers can start with the best online cacrep counseling programs. CACREP-accredited programs ensure your qualifications are recognized nationally and can open doors in mental health, education, or rehabilitation settings.

For those aiming to work directly with couples and families, online marriage and family therapy graduate programs deliver affordable and quality training to become a licensed therapist. Graduates can look forward to careers in private practice, healthcare, or community agencies.

Best Scientists Citing Carl de Moor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles