World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
10935
World Ranking
4236
National Ranking
2362

Phillip J. Brantley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip J. Brantley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 144 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Phillip J. Brantley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip J. Brantley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Phillip J. Brantley is affiliated with the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in the United States. Their work is positioned primarily within the field of Medicine, with significant focus on several subfields including Physiology, Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, and Clinical Psychology.

The research topics covered by Brantley center primarily on obesity and related health practices. These include bariatric surgery and outcomes, diet and metabolism studies, obesity in relation to physical activity and diet, eating disorders and behaviors, as well as nutrition and health in aging.

Brantley's recent papers demonstrate a continuous engagement with issues surrounding weight loss, lifestyle interventions, and obesity-related metabolic profiling. Notable publications include:

  • Weight Loss in Underserved Patients - A Cluster-Randomized Trial, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Changes in mood and health-related quality of life in Look AHEAD 6 years after termination of the lifestyle intervention, 2021, Obesity
  • Comparison of weight loss data collected by research technicians versus electronic medical records: the PROPEL trial, 2022, International Journal of Obesity
  • Predictors of racial differences in weight loss: the PROPEL trial, 2023, Obesity
  • Longitudinal Profiling of Fasting Plasma Metabolome in Response to Weight-Loss Interventions in Patients with Morbid Obesity, 2024, Metabolites

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Brantley include Gang Hu, Peter T. Katzmarzyk, Corby K. Martin, Robert L. Newton, and John W. Apolzan. These collaborations have contributed to advancing research in obesity, weight loss interventions, and metabolic studies.

Brantley's work is published often in venues that include UNC Libraries, Obesity, International Journal of Obesity, Circulation, and New England Journal of Medicine. The distribution of publications indicates a consistent focus on journals relevant to obesity-related research and clinical practice.

In recognition of professional standing, Brantley was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 1994.

Best Publications

  • Comparison of strategies for sustaining weight loss: the weight loss maintenance randomized controlled trial.

    Laura P. Svetkey;Victor J. Stevens;Phillip J. Brantley;Lawrence J. Appel

  • Effects of Comprehensive Lifestyle Modification on Diet, Weight, Physical Fitness, and Blood Pressure Control: 18-Month Results of a Randomized Trial

    Patricia J. Elmer;Eva Obarzanek;William M. Vollmer;Denise Simons-Morton

  • A Daily Stress Inventory: development, reliability, and validity.

    Phillip J. Brantley;Craig D. Waggoner;Glenn N. Jones;Neil B. Rappaport

  • Weight loss during the intensive intervention phase of the weight-loss maintenance trial.

    Jack F. Hollis;Christina M. Gullion;Victor J. Stevens;Phillip J. Brantley

  • The DSM-IV field trial for mixed anxiety-depression.

    R E Zinbarg;D H Barlow;M Liebowitz;L Street

  • Postconcussion symptoms and daily stress in normal and head-injured college populations.

    William Drew Gouvier;Barbara Cubic;Glenn Jones;Phillip Brantley

  • The Utility of the Ces-D as a Depression Screening Measure among Low-Income Women Attending Primary Care Clinics

    Janet L. Thomas;Glenn N. Jones;Isabel C. Scarinci;Daniel J. Mehan

  • A descriptive and comparative study of the prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders in low-income adults with type 2 diabetes and other chronic illnesses.

    Janet L Thomas;Glenn Jones;Isabel Scarinci;Phillip Brantley

  • Validation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in a low-income African American sample of medical outpatients.

    Karen B. Grothe;Gareth R. Dutton;Glenn N. Jones;Jamie Bodenlos

  • Predictors of outpatient medical appointment attendance among persons with HIV.

    Sheryl L. Catz;J. B. McClure;G. N. Jones;P. J. Brantley

  • Self-efficacy as a predictor of weight change in African-American women.

    Pamela D. Martin;Gareth R. Dutton;Phillip J. Brantley

  • Convergence between the Daily Stress Inventory and endocrine measures of stress.

    Phillip J. Brantley;Linda S. Dietz;G. Tipton McKnight;Glenn N. Jones

  • The relation between daily stress and Crohn's disease.

    Garrett Vd;Brantley Pj;Jones Gn;McKnight Gt

  • Effects of PREMIER lifestyle modifications on participants with and without the metabolic syndrome.

    Lillian F. Lien;Ann J. Brown;Jamy D. Ard;Catherine Loria

  • Predicting Medical Regimen Adherence: The Interactions of Health Locus of Control Beliefs

    Erin L. O’hea;Karen B. Grothe;Jamie S. Bodenlos;Edwin D. Boudreaux

  • Design and Implementation of an Interactive Website to Support Long-Term Maintenance of Weight Loss

    Victor J. Stevens;Kristine L. Funk;Phillip J. Brantley;Thomas P. Erlinger

  • The interaction of locus of control, self-efficacy, and outcome expectancy in relation to HbA1c in medically underserved individuals with type 2 diabetes.

    Erin L. O'Hea;Simon Moon;Karen B. Grothe;Edwin D. Boudreaux

  • Stress, depression, and anxiety predict average symptom severity and daily symptom fluctuation in systemic lupus erythematosus.

    Serrhel G. Adams;Paul M. Dammers;Tara L. Saia;Phillip J. Brantley;Phillip J. Brantley

  • Aerobic fitness and leisure physical activity as moderators of the stress-illness relation.

    Cindy Lynn Carmack;Edwin Boudreaux;Marta Amaral-Melendez;Phillip J. Brantley;Phillip J. Brantley

  • Barriers to Physical Activity Among Predominantly Low-Income African- American Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

    Gareth R. Dutton;Jolene Johnson;Dori Whitehead;Jamie S. Bodenlos

  • Weight Loss in Underserved Patients — A Cluster-Randomized Trial

    Peter T. Katzmarzyk;Corby K. Martin;Robert L. Newton;John W. Apolzan

  • The relation between stress and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis

    Bradley T. Thomason;Phillip J. Brantley;Phillip J. Brantley;Glenn N. Jones;Herbert R. Dyer

  • Daily Stress and Stress-Related Disorders

    Phillip J. Brantley;Glenn N. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Laura P. Svetkey
Laura P. Svetkey Duke University
Lawrence J. Appel
Lawrence J. Appel Johns Hopkins University
Catherine M. Champagne
Catherine M. Champagne Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Isabel C. Scarinci
Isabel C. Scarinci University of Alabama at Birmingham
William M. Vollmer
William M. Vollmer Kaiser Permanente
Donna H. Ryan
Donna H. Ryan Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Shiriki K. Kumanyika
Shiriki K. Kumanyika Drexel University
Henry E. Adams
Henry E. Adams University of Georgia
David H. Barlow
David H. Barlow Boston University
Abby C. King
Abby C. King Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree opens a variety of career pathways, from counseling to clinical work. Many students opt for online degrees to balance flexibility with quality education, often leading to roles such as a marriage and family therapist (MFT). It’s important to know that requirements can vary greatly depending on your location and desired specialty.

For instance, the Buffalo mft education requirements set specific standards for coursework and supervised clinical experience. Similarly, those interested in Chandler must follow Chandler mft certification requirements for local licensing.

Preparing to practice in Charlotte involves meeting the Charlotte mft certification requirements, which may differ from other cities. Additionally, if you aim to work in Virginia, learning how to become a marriage and family therapist in Chesapeake will guide you through the necessary steps in that area.

Overall, researching local regulations and educational requirements is crucial for anyone planning a career in psychology or therapy, especially if you are considering online study options.

Best Scientists Citing Phillip J. Brantley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles