World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
6793
World Ranking
4788
National Ranking
2268

Alexander V. Prokhorov publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander V. Prokhorov sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 145 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Alexander V. Prokhorov D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander V. Prokhorov sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexander V. Prokhorov is a researcher affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their work primarily spans medicine, social sciences, and psychology, with notable contributions to the understanding of smoking behavior and cessation, behavioral health interventions, and media influence on health.

The researcher has authored publications focused on tobacco use prevention, health communication, and intervention implementation. The topics covered in their work include mobile health applications, child development with digital technology, health policy implementation science, and sociopolitical dynamics in Russia.

Alexander V. Prokhorov's recent papers include:

  • Friendship influence moderating the effect of a web-based smoking prevention program on intention to smoke and knowledge among adolescents, 2020, Addictive Behaviors Reports
  • Mobile Text Messaging for Tobacco Risk Communication Among Young Adult Community College Students: Randomized Trial of Project Debunk, 2021, JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • Implementing Brief Tobacco Cessation Interventions in Community Pharmacies: An Application of Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations Theory, 2022, Pharmacy
  • Internet discourse of modern socio-political movements as a way of self-representation (on the example of the yellow waistcoat movement), 2024, Vestnik of Student Scientific Society of Saint Petersburg University Social Sciences
  • A multilevel intervention in pediatric primary care for youth tobacco control: Outcomes of implementing an Ask, Advise, and Connect model, 2024, Translational Behavioral Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Alexander V. Prokhorov include:

  • Georges E. Khalil
  • Karen S. Calabro
  • Ashish Arya
  • Sophia Russell
  • Katarzyna Czerniak

Publishers and venues where Prokhorov's work has appeared include:

  • Addictive Behaviors Reports
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • Pharmacy
  • Vestnik of Student Scientific Society of Saint Petersburg University Social Sciences
  • Translational Behavioral Medicine

Alexander V. Prokhorov's research covers several subfields of study such as physiology, applied psychology, general health professions, literature and literary theory, and education, indicating a multidisciplinary approach.

Best Publications

  • Measuring nicotine dependence among high-risk adolescent smokers☆

    Alexander V. Prokhorov;Unto E. Pallonen;Joseph L. Fava;Lin Ding

  • Diabetes Self-Management: Self-reported recommendations and patterns in a large population

    Laurie Ruggiero;Russell E. Glasgow;Janet M. Dryfoos;Joseph S. Rossi

  • Stages of acquisition and cessation for adolescent smoking: an empirical integration

    Unto E. Pallonen;James O. Prochaska;Wayne F. Velicer;Alexander V. Prokhorov

  • Effects of nativity, age at migration, and acculturation on smoking among adult Houston residents of Mexican descent.

    Anna V. Wilkinson;Margaret R. Spitz;Sara S. Strom;Alexander V. Prokhorov

  • Validation of the modified Fagerström tolerance questionnaire with salivary cotinine among adolescents.

    Alexander V Prokhorov;Carl De Moor;Unto E Pallonen;Karen Suchanek Hudmon

  • Predictors of susceptibility to smoking and ever smoking: a longitudinal study in a triethnic sample of adolescents.

    Ellen R. Gritz;Alexander V. Prokhorov;Karen Suchanek Hudmon;Mary Mullin Jones

  • A Population-Based Survey of Physician Smoking Cessation Counseling Practices

    Michael G. Goldstein;Judith D. DePue;Alicia D. Monroe;Cynthia Willey Lessne

  • Methodological issues in measuring treatment outcome in adolescent smoking cessation studies.

    Robin Mermelstein;Suzanne M. Colby;Christi Patten;Alexandre V Prokhorov

  • Depression and Substance Use in Minority Middle-School Students

    Steven H. Kelder;Nancy G. Murray;Pamela Orpinas;Alexander Prokhorov

  • Youth Tobacco Use: A Global Perspective for Child Health Care Clinicians

    Alexander V. Prokhorov;Jonathan P. Winickoff;Jasjit S. Ahluwalia;Deborah Ossip-Klein

  • Transitions out of High School: Time of Increased Cancer Risk?☆☆☆

    Tom Baranowski;Karen Weber Cullen;Karen Basen-Engquist;David W. Wetter

  • Computer-based smoking cessation interventions in adolescents: Description, feasibility, and six-month follow-up findings

    Unto E. Pallonen;Wayne F. Velicer;James O. Prochaska;Joseph S. Rossi

  • Cigarette Smoking in a Multiethnic Population of Youth: Methods and Baseline Findings

    Ellen R. Gritz;Alexander V. Prokhorov;Karen Suchanek Hudmon;Robert M. Chamberlain

  • Effects of a statewide antismoking campaign on mass media messages and smoking beliefs.

    David M. Murray;Alexander V. Prokhorov;Kathleen C. Harty

  • Tobacco cessation counseling: pharmacists' opinions and practices.

    Karen Suchanek Hudmon;Alexander V. Prokhorov;Robin L. Corelli

  • Affecting Perceptions of Harm and Addiction among College Waterpipe Tobacco Smokers

    Isaac M. Lipkus;Thomas Eissenberg;Rochelle D. Schwartz-Bloom;Alexander V. Prokhorov

  • Development and implementation of a tobacco cessation training program for students in the health professions.

    Karen Suchanek Hudmon;Robin L. Corelli;Eunice Chung;Berit Gundersen

  • Calculation of the Effective Emissivities of Specular-Diffuse Cavities by the Monte Carlo Method

    V I Sapritsky;A V Prokhorov

  • Gender differences in the psychological determinants of cigarette smoking

    Jean François Etter;Alexander V. Prokhorov;Thomas V. Perneger

  • Self-reported health status, health vulnerability, and smoking behavior in college students: Implications for intervention

    Alexander V. Prokhorov;Carla Warneke;Carl de Moor;Karen M. Emmons

  • Smoking and diabetes: Readiness for change and provider advice

    Laurie Ruggiero;Joseph S Rossi;James O Prochaska;Russell E Glasgow

Frequent Co-Authors

Carl de Moor
Carl de Moor Boston Children's Hospital
Melissa L. Bondy
Melissa L. Bondy Stanford University
Steven H. Kelder
Steven H. Kelder The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Ellen R. Gritz
Ellen R. Gritz The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Margaret R. Spitz
Margaret R. Spitz Baylor College of Medicine
James O. Prochaska
James O. Prochaska University of Rhode Island
Cheryl L. Perry
Cheryl L. Perry The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Joseph S. Rossi
Joseph S. Rossi University of Rhode Island
Karen M. Emmons
Karen M. Emmons Harvard University
David W. Wetter
David W. Wetter University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring advanced education in Social Sciences and Humanities offers flexibility and a wide range of rewarding careers. With the rise of online learning, students can now access affordable and accredited programs from top institutions across the USA.

If you are interested in psychology, starting with the cheapest online degree in psychology can be an excellent first step. For those wishing to make a direct impact in community services, pursuing a masters in social work provides opportunities in a high-demand field and often has flexible admission requirements.

Those aiming for clinical practice or advanced research roles in psychology should consider the best psyd programs available online. Alternatively, professionals passionate about supporting family dynamics may opt for the best online mft programs to become licensed marriage and family therapists.

Each pathway offers unique career prospects and different learning formats, making it important to compare program lengths, admission criteria, and costs to find the right fit for your educational and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander V. Prokhorov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles