World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
14598
World Ranking
5569
National Ranking
3041

Colleen A. Redding publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colleen A. Redding sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Colleen A. Redding D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colleen A. Redding sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Colleen A. Redding is affiliated with the University of Rhode Island in the United States and contributes extensively to research in medicine and health professions. Their work spans several specialized subfields, including public health, environmental and occupational health, radiological and ultrasound technology, clinical psychology, general health professions, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The primary focus of Redding's research involves topics related to palliative care and end-of-life issues. Additional areas covered include family and patient care in intensive care units, childhood cancer survivors' quality of life, adolescent and pediatric healthcare, schizophrenia research and treatment, cancer survivorship and care, and aspects of grief, bereavement, and mental health.

Redding's recent scholarly output includes the following papers:

  • Understanding the Role of Knowledge in Advance Care Planning Engagement, 2021, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
  • Effect of Computer-Tailored Print Feedback, Motivational Interviewing, and Motivational Enhancement Therapy on Engagement in Advance Care Planning, 2022, JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Effect of the STAMP (Sharing and Talking About My Preferences) Intervention on Completing Multiple Advance Care Planning Activities in Ambulatory Care, 2021, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Implementing Coordinated Specialty Care in CMHC Youth and Young Adults with Severe Mental Illness: Preliminary Outcome Assessment, 2021, Community Mental Health Journal
  • Development and Implementation of a Psychological Service for Patients With Cancer, 2020, Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Andrea L. Paiva
  • Terri R. Fried
  • Joseph S. Rossi
  • Miryam Yusufov
  • James O. Prochaska

Redding's research findings have been published in venues such as Community Mental Health Journal, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, JAMA Internal Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. The number of publications per venue indicates a sustained contribution to community mental health and pain and symptom management fields.

Best Publications

  • Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors

    James O. Prochaska;Wayne F. Velicer;Joseph S. Rossi;Michael G. Goldstein

  • The transtheoretical model and stages of change.

    James O. Prochaska;Colleen A. Redding;Kerry E. Evers

  • The Transtheoretical Model of Change and HIV Prevention: A Review:

    James O. Prochaska;Colleen A. Redding;Lisa L. Harlow;Joseph S. Rossi

  • Stage-based expert systems to guide a population of primary care patients to quit smoking, eat healthier, prevent skin cancer, and receive regular mammograms.

    James O. Prochaska;Wayne F. Velicer;Colleen Redding;Joseph S. Rossi

  • SMOKING CESSATION AND STRESS MANAGEMENT : APPLICATIONS OF THE TRANSTHEORETICAL MODEL OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE

    Wayne F. Velicer;James O. Prochaska;Joseph L. Fava;Gregory J. Norman

  • Initial efficacy of MI, TTM tailoring and HRI’s with multiple behaviors for employee health promotion

    James O. Prochaska;Susan Butterworth;Colleen A. Redding;Verna Burden

  • Prevalence of body dissatisfaction among United States adults: review and recommendations for future research.

    Lauren Fiske;Elizabeth A. Fallon;Elizabeth A. Fallon;Bryan Blissmer;Colleen A. Redding

  • Multiple risk expert systems interventions: impact of simultaneous stage-matched expert system interventions for smoking, high-fat diet, and sun exposure in a population of parents.

    James O. Prochaska;Wayne F. Velicer;Joseph S. Rossi;Colleen A. Redding

  • Stage of change, decisional balance, and temptations for smoking: measurement and validation in a large, school-based population of adolescents.

    Brett A Plummer;Wayne F Velicer;Colleen A Redding;James O Prochaska

  • Treatment for cigarette smoking among depressed mental health outpatients: a randomized clinical trial.

    Sharon M. Hall;Janice Y. Tsoh;Judith J. Prochaska;Stuart Eisendrath

  • Stages of change for the component behaviors of advance care planning.

    Terri R. Fried;Colleen A. Redding;Mark L Robbins;Andrea L. Paiva

  • Stages of change for adherence with medication regimens for chronic disease: development and validation of a measure.

    Cynthia Willey;Colleen Redding;Julie Stafford;Frances Garfield

  • Teen Reach: Outcomes From a Randomized, Controlled Trial of a Tobacco Reduction Program for Teens Seen in Primary Medical Care

    Jack F. Hollis;Michael R. Polen;Evelyn P. Whitlock;Edward Lichtenstein

  • Integrating Norm Activation Model and Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Sustainable Transport Behavior: Evidence from China

    Yuwei Liu;Hong Sheng;Norbert Mundorf;Colleen Redding

  • Tailored communications for smoking cessation: past successes and future directions*

    Wayne F. Velicer;James O. Prochaska;Colleen A. Redding

  • A network-individual-resource model for HIV prevention.

    Blair T. Johnson;Colleen A. Redding;Ralph Joseph Diclemente;Brian S. Mustanski

  • Using the Transtheoretical Model for population-based approaches to health promotion and disease prevention.

    Wayne F. Velicer;James O. Prochaska;Joseph L. Fava;Joseph S. Rossi

  • A framework for incorporating dyads in models of HIV-prevention

    Benjamin R. Karney;Hyman Hops;Colleen A. Redding;Harry T. Reis

  • Preventing skin cancer through behavior change : implications for interventions

    Joseph S. Rossi;Linelle M. Blais;Colleen A. Redding;Martin A. Weinstock

  • Randomized controlled community trial of the efficacy of a multicomponent stage-matched intervention to increase sun protection among beachgoers.

    Martin A. Weinstock;Joseph S. Rossi;Colleen A. Redding;Jason E. Maddock

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph S. Rossi
Joseph S. Rossi University of Rhode Island
James O. Prochaska
James O. Prochaska University of Rhode Island
Wayne F. Velicer
Wayne F. Velicer University of Rhode Island
Jeffrey F. Peipert
Jeffrey F. Peipert Indiana University
Joseph L. Fava
Joseph L. Fava Brown University
Martin A. Weinstock
Martin A. Weinstock Brown University
Lisa L. Harlow
Lisa L. Harlow University of Rhode Island
Judith J. Prochaska
Judith J. Prochaska Stanford University
Sharon M. Hall
Sharon M. Hall University of California, San Francisco
Seth M. Noar
Seth M. Noar University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open doors to a range of online degrees and specialized career paths. One especially rewarding direction is speech-language pathology, which blends psychological principles with communication sciences. Working as a speech-language pathologist requires a graduate degree and state-specific certifications. Each state has its own requirements and licensure steps, so it’s important to plan ahead.

For example, those looking into Maryland speech pathologist certification requirements will find unique coursework and clinical hours essential for licensing. If Massachusetts is your destination, review Massachusetts speech pathologist certification requirements for their specific application processes and exam details.

Careers in other states, such as Michigan, require understanding Michigan slp certification requirements. Similarly, if you plan to practice in Minnesota, be sure to learn how to become a speech language pathologist in Minnesota, as their regulations and supervised practice expectations may differ.

Exploring online degrees in psychology or speech-language pathology prepares students for diverse roles in clinical, educational, or research settings—equipping them to create meaningful change in people’s lives.

Best Scientists Citing Colleen A. Redding

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles