World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip McCallion

Philip McCallion

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6984 6512 3785 3442 238 7698

Philip McCallion publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip McCallion between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip McCallion published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2010. 34 of the 313 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2010. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 17 publications
1993 2025

313 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip McCallion: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 2
1995 3
1996 1
1997 4
1998 1
1999 3
2000 4
2001 2
2002 5
2003 2
2004 5
2005 8
2006 4
2007 4
2008 5
2009 3
2010 30
2011 3
2012 3
2013 12
2014 10
2015 6
2016 18
2017 17
2018 20
2019 19
2020 17
2021 29
2022 21
2023 17
2024 17
2025 17
Total 313
Download as CSV

Philip McCallion publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip McCallion sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 238 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 238
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip McCallion D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip McCallion sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip McCallion is affiliated with Temple University in the United States and has an extensive body of research focused primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work explores several key subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Epidemiology, General Health Professions, and Genetics. This multidisciplinary approach informs much of their research activity.

Their scholarly output includes investigations into topics such as Down syndrome and intellectual disability research, frailty in older adults, chronic disease management strategies, genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, health disparities and outcomes, family and disability support research, and healthcare innovation and challenges.

Recent publications by Philip McCallion center largely on intellectual disability and ageing populations. Notable papers include:

  • "The impact of COVID-19 on the social inclusion of older adults with an intellectual disability during the first wave of the pandemic in Ireland," 2021, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
  • "The potential for person-centred planning to support the community participation of adults with an intellectual disability," 2021, Journal of Intellectual Disabilities
  • "An exploration of the consequences of, and coping with loneliness in an ageing intellectual disability population," 2022, HRB Open Research
  • "Approaches to and outcomes of future planning for family carers of adults with an intellectual disability: A systematic review," 2020, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
  • "The nature and quality of friendship for older adults with an intellectual disability in Ireland," 2020, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

Philip McCallion frequently publishes in several academic journals, particularly:

  • HRB Open Research
  • Journal of Intellectual Disabilities
  • Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
  • Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
  • British Journal of Learning Disabilities

Their research collaborations include partnerships with several frequent co-authors such as Mary McCarron, Éilish Burke, Máire O'Dwyer, Fintan Sheerin, and Martin Henman, indicating ongoing teamwork within this research community.

Best Publications

  • Social Inclusion and Community Participation of Individuals with Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities

    Angela Novak Amado;Roger J. Stancliffe;Mary McCarron;Philip McCallion

  • Health characteristics and health services utilization in older adults with intellectual disability living in community residences.

    M. P. Janicki;M. P. Janicki;P. W. Davidson;C. M. Henderson;P. McCallion

  • A problem solving intervention for caregivers of cancer patients.

    Ronald W. Toseland;Christina G. Blanchard;Philip McCallion

  • Educating Nursing Assistants to Communicate More Effectively With Nursing Home Residents With Dementia

    Philip McCallion;Ronald W. Toseland;Debra Lacey;Steve Banks

  • A prospective 20-year longitudinal follow-up of dementia in persons with Down syndrome.

    M McCarron;P McCallion;E Reilly;P Dunne

  • Predictors of health and human services use by persons with dementia and their family caregivers.

    Ronald W Toseland;Philip McCallion;Todd Gerber;Steve Banks

  • Factors associated with polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy in older people with intellectual disability differ from the general population: a cross-sectional observational nationwide study

    Máire O'Dwyer;Jure Peklar;Philip McCallion;Mary McCarron

  • A prospective 14‐year longitudinal follow‐up of dementia in persons with Down syndrome

    M. McCarron;P. McCallion;E. Reilly;N. Mulryan

  • Patterns of multimorbidity in an older population of persons with an intellectual disability: results from the intellectual disability supplement to the Irish longitudinal study on aging (IDS-TILDA).

    Mary McCarron;Janet Swinburne;Eilish Burke;Eimear McGlinchey

  • The Impact of Validation Group Therapy on Nursing Home Residents With Dementia

    Ronald W. Toseland;Manfred Diehl;Kurt Freeman;Theresa Manzanares

  • An evaluation of a family visit education program.

    Philip McCallion;Ronald W. Toseland;Kurt Freeman

  • Mortality of People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities from Select US State Disability Service Systems and Medical Claims Data.

    Emily Lauer;Philip McCallion

  • Health co-morbidities in ageing persons with Down syndrome and Alzheimer's dementia.

    M. McCarron;M. Gill;P. McCallion;C. Begley

  • The Effects of a Problem-Solving Intervention with Spouses of Cancer Patients

    Christina G. Blanchard;Ronald W. Toseland;Philip McCallion

  • Use of Health and Human Services by Community-Residing People with Dementia

    Ronald W. Toseland;Philip McCallion;Todd Gerber;Caroline Dawson

  • Mortality Rates in the General Irish Population Compared to those with an Intellectual Disability from 2003 to 2012.

    Mary McCarron;Rachael Carroll;Caraiosa Kelly;Philip McCallion

  • Grandparent caregivers I: Characteristics of the grandparents and the children with disabilities for whom they care.

    Matthew P. Janicki;Philip McCallion;Lucinda Grant-Griffin;Stacey R. Kolomer

  • Grandparent Carers II: Service Needs and Service Provision Issues

    Philip McCallion;Matthew P. Janicki;Lucinda Grant-Griffin;Stacey Kolomer

  • Effect of deinstitutionalisation on quality of life for adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review

    Mary McCarron;Richard Lombard-Vance;Esther Murphy;Peter May

  • Depression and caregiver mastery in grandfathers caring for their grandchildren.

    Stacey R. Kolomer;Philip McCallion

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger J. Stancliffe
Roger J. Stancliffe University of Sydney
Charles Normand
Charles Normand Trinity College Dublin
Juan Fortea
Juan Fortea Hospital de Sant Pau
Valerie J. Smith
Valerie J. Smith Trinity College Dublin
Michael Gill
Michael Gill Trinity College Dublin
Manfred Diehl
Manfred Diehl Colorado State University
Hasheem Mannan
Hasheem Mannan University College Dublin
Kevin P. Haggerty
Kevin P. Haggerty University of Washington
Karl G. Hill
Karl G. Hill University of Colorado Boulder
Rose Anne Kenny
Rose Anne Kenny Trinity College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to many rewarding careers. Mental health fields like substance abuse counseling and behavioral analysis are in high demand, and online programs can offer flexible paths to these roles.

For those interested in addiction treatment, understanding the Wichita substance abuse counselor certification requirements is essential. In contrast, requirements may vary based on location, as seen in the Winston Salem substance abuse counselors education requirements.

Many psychology graduates also pursue applied behavioral analysis. Becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) requires specific coursework and supervised fieldwork. You can find resources about becoming a bcba in Albuquerque as well as bcba certification requirements in Anaheim to better understand these educational pathways.

Online psychology degrees can help students meet prerequisites for certification and licensure in these specialized areas, creating flexible opportunities to advance your career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Philip McCallion

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles