World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5648 5246 3071 2783 145 10448

Manfred Diehl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Manfred Diehl between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Manfred Diehl published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2021. 14 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2021. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 7 publications
1991 2025

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Manfred Diehl: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 3
1995 3
1996 1
1997 2
1998 3
1999 2
2000 2
2001 1
2002 0
2003 3
2004 3
2005 1
2006 4
2007 3
2008 2
2009 1
2010 3
2011 5
2012 2
2013 4
2014 16
2015 6
2016 4
2017 10
2018 5
2019 5
2020 19
2021 20
2022 11
2023 12
2024 7
2025 7
Total 172
Download as CSV

Manfred Diehl publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manfred Diehl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 145 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 145
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Manfred Diehl D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manfred Diehl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Manfred Diehl is affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their research work primarily focuses on aging and gerontology, exploring psychological well-being, health disparities, and behavioral health interventions related to aging populations.

The scientist has published over 100 works, addressing topics in aging and psychological health. Their subfields of study include neuropsychology and physiological psychology, social psychology, applied psychology, health, and demography.

Notable frequent co-authors collaborating with Manfred Diehl include:

  • Hans-Werner Wahl
  • Abigail Nehrkorn-Bailey
  • Allyson Brothers
  • Serena Sabatini
  • Roman Kaspar

Their research has appeared frequently in the following publication venues:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • Psychology and Aging
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • The Gerontologist
  • American Psychologist

Prominent papers authored or co-authored by Manfred Diehl include:

  • Optimizing aging: A call for a new narrative, 2020, American Psychologist
  • Age-related change in self-perceptions of aging: Longitudinal trajectories and predictors of change, 2021, Psychology and Aging

Other influential papers in the broader scope of aging research that relate closely to topics Manfred Diehl investigates include:

  • Aging in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding Ageism and Fostering Intergenerational Solidarity, 2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Longitudinal effects of subjective aging on health and longevity: An updated meta-analysis, 2023, Psychology and Aging
  • The Effects of Age Stereotypes on Physical and Mental Health Are Mediated by Self-perceptions of Aging, 2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series B

Manfred Diehl has authored books such as "The psychology of later life: A contextual perspective," published in 2020 by the American Psychological Association.

Main topics covered in their research include:

  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Physical Activity and Health

In recognition of contributions to psychology, Manfred Diehl was awarded the title Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2006.

Best Publications

  • Age and sex differences in strategies of coping and defense across the life span

    Manfred Diehl;Nathan Coyle;Gisela Labouvie-Vief

  • Empathy across the adult lifespan: Longitudinal and experience-sampling findings.

    Daniel Grühn;Kristine Rebucal;Manfred Diehl;Mark Lumley

  • Adult attachment styles: their relations to family context and personality.

    Manfred Diehl;Alexandra B. Elnick;Linda S. Bourbeau;Gisela Labouvie-Vief

  • The influence of subjective aging on health and longevity: a meta-analysis of longitudinal data.

    Gerben J. Westerhof;Martina Miche;Anne E. Barrett

  • Awareness of Aging: Theoretical Considerations on an Emerging Concept.

    Manfred Diehl;Hans-Werner Wahl;Anne E. Barrett

  • Everyday problem solving in older adults: observational assessment and cognitive correlates.

    M Diehl;S L Willis;K W Schaie

  • Risk and Resilience Factors in Coping with Daily Stress in Adulthood: The Role of Age, Self-Concept Incoherence, and Personal Control.

    Manfred Diehl;Elizabeth L. Hay

  • Awareness of Age-Related Change: Examination of a (Mostly) Unexplored Concept

    Manfred K. Diehl;Hans-Werner Wahl

  • How do views on aging affect health outcomes in adulthood and late life? Explanations for an established connection.

    Susanne Wurm;Manfred Diehl;Anna Elena Kornadt;Gerben J. Westerhof

  • Agency and communion attributes in adults’ spontaneous self-representations

    Manfred Diehl;Stephanie K. Owen;Lise M. Youngblade

  • Measuring one component of dispositional self-regulation: attention control in goal pursuit

    Aleksandra Luszczynska;Manfred Diehl;Benicio Gutiérrez-Doña;Patrik Kuusinen

  • Assessing attention control in goal pursuit: a component of dispositional self-regulation.

    Manfred Diehl;Angelenia B. Semegon;Ralf Schwarzer

  • Representations of self across the life span.

    Gisela Labouvie-Vief;Lisa M. Chiodo;Lori A. Goguen;Manfred Diehl

  • Measuring Future Time Perspective across Adulthood: Development and Evaluation of a Brief Multidimensional Questionnaire

    Helena Chui;Manfred Diehl

  • Change in coping and defense mechanisms across adulthood: Longitudinal findings in a European American sample.

    Manfred Diehl;Helena Chui;Elizabeth L. Hay;Mark A. Lumley

  • Longitudinal Change and Prediction of Everyday Task Competence in the Elderly.

    Sherry L. Willis;Gina M. Jay;Manfred Diehl;Michael Marsiske

  • The Revised Observed Tasks of Daily Living: A Performance-Based Assessment of Everyday Problem Solving in Older Adults.

    Manfred Diehl;Michael Marsiske;Ann L. Horgas;Adrienne Rosenberg

  • Everyday Competence in Later Life: Current Status and Future Directions

    Manfred Diehl

  • Self-concept differentiation across the adult life span.

    Manfred Diehl;Catherine T. Hastings;James M. Stanton

  • Handbook of Intraindividual Variability Across the Life Span

    Manfred Diehl;Karen Hooker;Martin J. Sliwinski

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans-Werner Wahl
Hans-Werner Wahl Heidelberg University
Gisela Labouvie-Vief
Gisela Labouvie-Vief University of Geneva
Helena C. Chui
Helena C. Chui University of Southern California
Linda Clare
Linda Clare University of Exeter
Obioha C. Ukoumunne
Obioha C. Ukoumunne University of Exeter
Clive Ballard
Clive Ballard University of Exeter
Ralf Schwarzer
Ralf Schwarzer Freie Universität Berlin
Karen Hooker
Karen Hooker Oregon State University
Michael A. Smyer
Michael A. Smyer Bucknell University
Kaarin J. Anstey
Kaarin J. Anstey University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying psychology in the USA, exploring online degrees and specialized career pathways is essential. Many students pursue advanced training to become licensed professionals, such as Marriage and Family Therapists (MFTs). These careers require not only a degree in psychology or a related field, but also in-depth knowledge of state-specific licensing requirements.

For instance, understanding Mesa mft certification requirements can help guide students residing in Arizona. In Florida, students should review Miami mft education requirements to ensure they meet all guidelines for clinical practice. Similarly, those interested in working in the Midwest can look into the process of how to become an mft in Milwaukee, or in the Twin Cities by researching Minneapolis mft education requirements.

With many universities now offering online psychology programs, there's flexibility to pursue your preferred path while meeting licensure standards in your state. Exploring these degree options and career requirements can set you on the right track toward a rewarding profession in psychology or family therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Manfred Diehl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles