World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
15158
World Ranking
3675
National Ranking
23

Liat Ayalon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liat Ayalon sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 362 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Liat Ayalon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liat Ayalon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Liat Ayalon is affiliated with Bar-Ilan University in Israel and conducts research primarily in the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology. Their work spans several subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Demography, Health, and General Health Professions.

The researcher has contributed to multiple topics within aging and gerontology research such as:

  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies

Liat Ayalon's recent papers include:

  • "Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis" (2020) published in Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • "Aging in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding Ageism and Fostering Intergenerational Solidarity" (2020) published in The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • "There is nothing new under the sun: ageism and intergenerational tension in the age of the COVID-19 outbreak" (2020) published in International Psychogeriatrics

Liat Ayalon has collaborated frequently with several researchers including Kiran Rabheru, Alastair J. Flint, Dilip V. Jeste, Helen Lavretsky, and Ramat Gan.

Their research is also prominently published in venues such as:

  • International Psychogeriatrics
  • Innovation in Aging
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • The Gerontologist

Ayalon has authored books as well, with one publication through Oxford University Press titled Successful Aging (2021).

Best Publications

  • Aging in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding Ageism and Fostering Intergenerational Solidarity.

    Liat Ayalon;Alison Chasteen;Manfred Diehl;Becca R. Levy

  • The neural basis of the psychomotor vigilance task.

    Sean P. A. Drummond;Amanda Bischoff-Grethe;Amanda Bischoff-Grethe;David F. Dinges;Liat Ayalon;Liat Ayalon

  • Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Ying Sun;Chen He;Yin Wu;Yin Wu

  • Contemporary Perspectives on Ageism

    Liat Ayalon;Clemens Tesch-Römer

  • Situational versus chronic loneliness as risk factors for all-cause mortality.

    Sharon Shiovitz-Ezra;Liat Ayalon

  • Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

    Yin Wu;Brooke Levis;Kira E. Riehm;Nazanin Saadat

  • Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions for the management of neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with dementia: a systematic review.

    Liat Ayalon;Amber M Gum;Leilani Feliciano;Patricia A Areán

  • Knowledge of Alzheimer's disease in four ethnic groups of older adults.

    Liat Ayalon;Patricia A. Areán

  • Diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders in older adults.

    Sonia Ancoli-Israel;Liat Ayalon

  • Improving depression care for older, minority patients in primary care.

    Patricia A. Areán;Liat Ayalon;Enid Hunkeler;Elizabeth H B Lin

  • There is nothing new under the sun: ageism and intergenerational tension in the age of the COVID-19 outbreak.

    Liat Ayalon

  • Traumatic brain injury and sleep disturbance: a review of current research.

    Henry J. Orff;Liat Ayalon;Sean P. A. Drummond

  • Sustained Use of CPAP Slows Deterioration of Cognition, Sleep, and Mood in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Preliminary Study

    Jana R. Cooke;Liat Ayalon;Barton W. Palmer;Jose S. Loredo

  • The relationships between major lifetime discrimination, everyday discrimination, and mental health in three racial and ethnic groups of older adults

    Liat Ayalon;Amber M Gum

  • Ageism among physicians, nurses, and social workers: findings from a qualitative study.

    Aya Ben-Harush;Sharon Shiovitz-Ezra;Israel Doron;Sara Alon

  • Sleep in the Elderly: Normal Variations and Common Sleep Disorders

    Sonia Ancoli-Israel;Liat Ayalon;Carl Salzman

  • Use of Direct Versus Indirect Approaches to Measure Loneliness in Later Life

    Sharon Shiovitz-Ezra;Liat Ayalon

  • Racial group differences in help-seeking behaviors

    Liat Ayalon;Michael A Young

  • Taking a closer look at ageism: self- and other-directed ageist attitudes and discrimination

    Liat Ayalon;Clemens Tesch-Römer

  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Andrea Benedetti;John P.A. Ioannidis;Ying Sun

  • Relationship Between Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity and Brain Activation During a Sustained Attention Task

    Liat Ayalon;Liat Ayalon;Sonia Ancoli-Israel;Sonia Ancoli-Israel;Allison A Aka;Benjamin S McKenna;Benjamin S McKenna

  • A systematic review of existing ageism scales

    Liat Ayalon;Pnina Dolberg;Sarmitė Mikulionienė;Jolanta Perek-Białas

  • Introduction to the Section: Ageism—Concept and Origins

    Liat Ayalon;Clemens Tesch-Römer

Frequent Co-Authors

Patricia A. Areán
Patricia A. Areán University of Washington
Yuval Palgi
Yuval Palgi University of Haifa
Hans-Werner Wahl
Hans-Werner Wahl Heidelberg University
Angelo Picardi
Angelo Picardi Istituto Superiore di Sanità
Bernd Löwe
Bernd Löwe Universität Hamburg
Brian J. Hall
Brian J. Hall New York University Shanghai
Flávia de Lima Osório
Flávia de Lima Osório Universidade de São Paulo
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Femke Lamers
Femke Lamers Amsterdam UMC
Juliana C.N. Chan
Juliana C.N. Chan Chinese University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a range of specialized fields and career pathways. One popular route is becoming a marriage and family therapist (MFT). To practice as an MFT, you typically need a master’s degree, clinical experience, and state licensure. Requirements can vary based on location, so it's important to understand the specific steps involved.

For example, if you want to learn how to become a marriage and family therapist in Cincinnati or are interested in how to become a marriage and family therapist in Cleveland, each city has unique educational and licensing requirements.

Those considering a move to Colorado can also research how to become a marriage and family therapist in Colorado Springs. Similarly, understanding Columbus mft certification requirements will help you plan your journey in Ohio.

Many universities offer accredited online psychology degrees that provide a flexible and accessible path to these fulfilling roles. By researching state-specific requirements, you can be confident in choosing the best program and career pathway in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Liat Ayalon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles