World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 83 1261 1114 766 659 378 28562

Sara J. Czaja publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sara J. Czaja between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sara J. Czaja published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 59 publications in 2024. 82 of the 567 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 59. Peak 59 publications in 2024. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 7 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 6 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 40 publications 2020: 33 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 31 publications 2024: 59 publications 2025: 23 publications
1975 2025

567 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sara J. Czaja: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 1
1977 0
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 3
1982 2
1983 2
1984 0
1985 2
1986 2
1987 6
1988 1
1989 7
1990 4
1991 3
1992 0
1993 5
1994 3
1995 2
1996 1
1997 6
1998 6
1999 5
2000 5
2001 4
2002 16
2003 11
2004 14
2005 7
2006 18
2007 12
2008 16
2009 23
2010 9
2011 5
2012 23
2013 14
2014 15
2015 16
2016 14
2017 30
2018 22
2019 40
2020 33
2021 20
2022 24
2023 31
2024 59
2025 23
Total 567
Download as CSV

Sara J. Czaja publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sara J. Czaja sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 371–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 378 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63 378
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sara J. Czaja D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sara J. Czaja sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112 83
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Sara J. Czaja is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within social sciences and medicine. The subfields of study connected to their work include demography, psychiatry and mental health, general health professions, sociology and political science, and health.

The main topics explored in their research involve dementia and cognitive impairment, technology use by older adults, aging and gerontology, elder abuse and neglect, health disparities and outcomes, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, and geriatric care and nursing homes.

Several frequent publication venues reflect the distribution of their work:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Journal of Applied Gerontology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Gerontologist

Collaborations have been a significant part of their academic output. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Walter R. Boot
  • Neil Charness
  • Jerad Moxley
  • Peter Kallestrup
  • Wendy A. Rogers

Their recent significant papers include:

  • Social Support, Isolation, Loneliness, and Health Among Older Adults in the PRISM Randomized Controlled Trial, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis, 2022, American Psychologist
  • Family Caregiving for Older Adults, 2020, Annual Review of Psychology
  • Effects of the COVID-19 Outbreak on Elder Mistreatment and Response in New York City: Initial Lessons, 2020, Journal of Applied Gerontology
  • Family Matters: Cross-Cultural Differences in Familism and Caregiving Outcomes, 2021, The Journals of Gerontology Series B

In addition to articles, the scientist has contributed to scholarly books, including a publication under the series "Synthesis lectures on technology and health" titled Extended Reality Solutions to Support Older Adults in 2024.

The scientist was recognized with the designation Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 1997.

Best Publications

  • Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: Findings From the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE)

    Sara J. Czaja;Neil Charness;Arthur D. Fisk;Christopher Hertzog

  • Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches

    Arthur D. Fisk;Wendy A. Rogers;Neil Charness;Sara J. Czaja

  • Designing for Older Adults : Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, Second Edition

    Arthur Fisk;Wendy Rogers;Neil Charness;Sara Czaja

  • Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes

    Tracy L. Mitzner;Julie B. Boron;Cara Bailey Fausset;Anne E. Adams

  • Enhancing the Quality of Life of Dementia Caregivers from Different Ethnic or Racial Groups: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Steven H. Belle;Louis Burgio;Robert Burns;David Coon

  • Family Caregiving for Older Adults.

    Richard Schulz;Scott R. Beach;Sara J. Czaja;Lynn M. Martire

  • Dementia Caregiver Intervention Research In Search of Clinical Significance

    Richard Schulz;Alison O'Brien;Sara Czaja;Marcia Ory

  • The impact of aging on access to technology

    Sara J. Czaja;Chin Chin Lee

  • Long-term Care Placement of Dementia Patients and Caregiver Health and Well-being

    Richard Schulz;Steven H. Belle;Sara J. Czaja;Kathleen A. McGinnis

  • Effect of Multicomponent Interventions on Caregiver Burden and Depression: The REACH Multisite Initiative at 6-Month Follow-Up

    Laura N. Gitlin;Louis D. Burgio;Diane Mahoney;Robert Burns

  • Age Differences in Attitudes Toward Computers

    Sara J. Czaja;Joseph Sharit

  • Advancing the Aging and Technology Agenda in Gerontology

    Richard Schulz;Hans Werner Wahl;Judith T. Matthews;Annette De Vito Dabbs

  • Improving Social Support for Older Adults Through Technology: Findings From the PRISM Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Sara J Czaja;Walter R Boot;Neil Charness;Wendy A Rogers

  • The Effect of a Family Therapy and Technology-Based Intervention on Caregiver Depression

    Carl Eisdorfer;Sara J. Czaja;David A. Loewenstein;Mark P. Rubert

  • Social Network Analysis for Program Implementation

    Thomas W. Valente;Lawrence A. Palinkas;Sara Czaja;Kar Hai Chu

  • Aging, Motor Control, and the Performance of Computer Mouse Tasks

    Michael W. Smith;Joseph Sharit;Sara J. Czaja

  • Factors Predicting Decisions About Technology Adoption Among Older Adults.

    Ronald W Berkowsky;Joseph Sharit;Sara J Czaja

  • Cognitive rehabilitation of mildly impaired Alzheimer disease patients on cholinesterase inhibitors

    David A. Loewenstein;David A. Loewenstein;Amarilis Acevedo;Amarilis Acevedo;Sara J. Czaja;Ranjan Duara

  • Age differences in the performance of computer-based work.

    Sara J. Czaja;Joseph Sharit

  • Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore User Experience, Intent to Use, and Use Behavior of a Patient Portal Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Descriptive Qualitative Study

    Jennifer Dickman Portz;Jennifer Dickman Portz;Elizabeth A Bayliss;Elizabeth A Bayliss;Sheana Bull;Rebecca S Boxer

  • Enhancing the Quality of Life of Dementia Caregivers from Different Ethnic or Racial Groups

    Steven H. Belle;Louis Burgio;Robert Burns;David Coon

  • The impact of aging on access to technology

    Sara J. Czaja

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph Sharit
Joseph Sharit University of Miami
Neil Charness
Neil Charness Florida State University
Richard Schulz
Richard Schulz University of Pittsburgh
Walter R. Boot
Walter R. Boot Florida State University
Arthur D. Fisk
Arthur D. Fisk Georgia Institute of Technology
David A. Loewenstein
David A. Loewenstein University of Miami
Philip D. Harvey
Philip D. Harvey University of Miami
Colin G. Drury
Colin G. Drury University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Steven H. Belle
Steven H. Belle University of Pittsburgh
Michael H. Antoni
Michael H. Antoni University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens various online learning and career opportunities. Many aspiring professionals pursue counseling and mental health roles, where education and licensing requirements can differ based on region and specialization.

If you are interested in becoming a counselor, start by researching local requirements. For example, Huntsville mental health counselor education requirements emphasize graduate studies and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, find out how to become a mental health counselor in Indianapolis, as counselors there may need specific state testing and credentials.

In other regions, steps might vary. For those wondering how to become a mental health counselor in Irvine, key areas include accredited degree programs and internship experience. Likewise, the process for how to become a mental health counselor in Irving focuses on local certification and continuing education.

With many universities offering online psychology degrees, students can customize their learning for specialties such as counseling, clinical psychology, and more—no matter where they reside, the pathway begins with a strong educational foundation.

Best Scientists Citing Sara J. Czaja

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles