World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
13754
World Ranking
7101
National Ranking
3838

Joseph Sharit publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph Sharit sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 162 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joseph Sharit D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph Sharit sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph Sharit is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States and primarily conducts research within the social sciences. Their work spans several subfields including demography, neuropsychology and physiological psychology, health, psychiatry and mental health, and general health professions.

The central focus of their research concerns technology use by older adults, with a detailed exploration of aging and gerontology, retirement, disability, and employment. Other areas addressed in their published work include health disparities and outcomes, dementia and cognitive impairment research, economic and environmental valuation, and artificial intelligence in service interactions.

Their recent publications reflect this focus, including the following papers:

  • The Factors Influencing Older Adults' Decisions Surrounding Adoption of Technology: Quantitative Experimental Study (2022, JMIR Aging)
  • The Benefits of Technology for Engaging Aging Adults: Findings From the PRISM 2.0 Trial (2024, Innovation in Aging)
  • Investigating Older Adults' Willingness to Invest Time to Acquire Technology Skills Using a Discounting Approach (2021, Innovation in Aging)
  • Beyond the Digital Divide: Factors Associated With Adoption of Technologies Related to Aging in Place (2025, Journal of Applied Gerontology)
  • Exploring artificial intelligence-powered virtual assistants to understand their potential to support older adults' search needs (2025, Human Factors in Healthcare)

Joseph Sharit frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Notable coauthors include:

  • Sara J. Czaja
  • Jerad Moxley
  • Neil Charness
  • Wendy A. Rogers
  • Walter R. Boot

The scientist's work has appeared in a range of publication venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • JMIR Aging
  • Journal of Applied Gerontology
  • Human Factors in Healthcare
  • Gerontechnology

Best Publications

  • Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: Findings From the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE)

    Sara J. Czaja;Neil Charness;Arthur D. Fisk;Christopher Hertzog

  • Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches

    Arthur D. Fisk;Wendy A. Rogers;Neil Charness;Sara J. Czaja

  • Designing for Older Adults : Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, Second Edition

    Arthur Fisk;Wendy Rogers;Neil Charness;Sara Czaja

  • Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes

    Tracy L. Mitzner;Julie B. Boron;Cara Bailey Fausset;Anne E. Adams

  • Age Differences in Attitudes Toward Computers

    Sara J. Czaja;Joseph Sharit

  • Improving Social Support for Older Adults Through Technology: Findings From the PRISM Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Sara J Czaja;Walter R Boot;Neil Charness;Wendy A Rogers

  • Aging, Motor Control, and the Performance of Computer Mouse Tasks

    Michael W. Smith;Joseph Sharit;Sara J. Czaja

  • Factors Predicting Decisions About Technology Adoption Among Older Adults.

    Ronald W Berkowsky;Joseph Sharit;Sara J Czaja

  • Age differences in the performance of computer-based work.

    Sara J. Czaja;Joseph Sharit

  • Technology Adoption by Older Adults: Findings From the PRISM Trial.

    Tracy L Mitzner;Jyoti Savla;Walter R Boot;Joseph Sharit

  • Examining age differences in performance of a complex information search and retrieval task.

    Sara J. Czaja;Joseph Sharit;Raymond Ownby;David L. Roth

  • Computer Proficiency Questionnaire: Assessing Low and High Computer Proficient Seniors

    Walter R. Boot;Neil Charness;Sara J. Czaja;Joseph Sharit

  • Occupational Stress: Review and Reappraisal

    Joseph Sharit;Gavriel Salvendy

  • Investigating the Roles of Knowledge and Cognitive Abilities in Older Adult Information Seeking on the Web

    Joseph Sharit;Mario A. Hernández;Sara J. Czaja;Peter Pirolli

  • Factors influencing use of an e-health website in a community sample of older adults

    Sara J Czaja;Joseph Sharit;Chin Chin Lee;Sankaran N Nair

  • Use of and Satisfaction With Sources of Health Information Among Older Internet Users and Nonusers

    Jessica Taha;Joseph Sharit;Sara Czaja

  • Designing for Older Adults

    Dan Fisk;Neil Charness;Sara J. Czaja;Wendy A. Rogers

  • Factors affecting usage of a personal health record (PHR) to manage health.

    Jessica Taha;Sara J. Czaja;Joseph Sharit;Daniel G. Morrow

  • Designing Training and Instructional Programs for Older Adults

    Sara J. Czaja;Joseph Sharit

  • Ability-performance relationships as a function of age and task experience for a data entry task

    Sara J. Czaja;Joseph Sharit

Frequent Co-Authors

Sara J. Czaja
Sara J. Czaja Cornell University
Neil Charness
Neil Charness Florida State University
Arthur D. Fisk
Arthur D. Fisk Georgia Institute of Technology
Walter R. Boot
Walter R. Boot Florida State University
Colin G. Drury
Colin G. Drury University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Gavriel Salvendy
Gavriel Salvendy University of Central Florida
David L. Weimer
David L. Weimer University of Wisconsin–Madison
Rocio Garcia-Retamero
Rocio Garcia-Retamero University of Granada
Eleftherios Iakovou
Eleftherios Iakovou Texas A&M University
Peter Pirolli
Peter Pirolli Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of rewarding online degrees and career pathways. Many students pursue roles in counseling, therapy, or specialized communication fields like speech-language pathology. Online programs offer flexibility, making them an appealing choice for working professionals or those seeking a career change.

Each state in the US has distinct licensure requirements for psychology-related professions. For those interested in counseling, it's important to understand how to get an lpc license in Wyoming as an example of the steps needed in this discipline.

Speech-language pathology is another popular pathway, and certification requirements can differ across states. Students can review slp requirements in Alabama, along with slp requirements in Alaska and Arizona speech pathologist certification requirements to better understand local expectations.

Thorough research of each state's licensure and program requirements can help students choose the best educational and professional pathway. With the rise of accredited online programs, pursuing a specialized psychology career is more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph Sharit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles