World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
52
Citations
14714
World Ranking
2395
National Ranking
1164

Shelia R. Cotten publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shelia R. Cotten sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 214 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Shelia R. Cotten D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shelia R. Cotten sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shelia R. Cotten is affiliated with Clemson University in the United States and specializes primarily in the social sciences with a significant focus on sociology and political science. Their research portfolio encompasses a range of interdisciplinary topics that revolve around technology use and its impacts on various population groups, particularly older adults.

The main fields of study that Cotten contributes to include social sciences, sociology and political science, demography, general health professions, automotive engineering, and marketing. These fields intersect with their research interests, spanning issues from digital technology to health outcomes and mobility innovations.

Key topics covered in Cotten's work are:

  • Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Sharing Economy and Platforms
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment

Cotten's publication record includes research in a variety of academic venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • American Behavioral Scientist
  • Educational Gerontology
  • First Monday
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth

Recent papers highlight Cotten's focus on digital inequality and social impacts of technology, particularly among older adults. Selected recent works include:

  • Social media use and well-being among older adults, 2021, Current Opinion in Psychology
  • A Double Burden of Exclusion? Digital and Social Exclusion of Older Adults in Times of COVID-19, 2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Digital inequalities 2.0: Legacy inequalities in the information age, 2020, First Monday
  • Digital inequalities in time of pandemic: COVID-19 exposure risk profiles and new forms of vulnerability, 2020, First Monday
  • Digital inequalities 3.0: Emergent inequalities in the information age, 2020, First Monday

Cotten frequently collaborates with other researchers, with notable coauthors being:

  • Amy M. Schuster
  • Jenna A. Van Fossen
  • Elizabeth A. Mack
  • Chu-Hsiang Chang
  • Shubham Agrawal

Best Publications

  • Digital inequalities and why they matter

    Laura Robinson;Shelia R. Cotten;Hiroshi Ono;Anabel Quan-Haase

  • Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them

    Shelia R Cotten;Sipi S Gupta

  • No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance

    Reynol Junco;Shelia R. Cotten

  • Impact of internet use on loneliness and contact with others among older adults: cross-sectional analysis.

    Shelia R Cotten;William A Anderson;Brandi M McCullough

  • Student–faculty Interactions: Dynamics and Determinants

    Shelia R. Cotten;Bonnie Wilson

  • A Double Burden of Exclusion?Digital and Social Exclusion of Older Adults in Times of COVID-19.

    Alexander Seifert;Shelia R Cotten;Bo Xie

  • The relationship between internet activities and depressive symptoms in a sample of college freshmen.

    Charlie Morgan;Shelia R. Cotten

  • Internet Use and Depression Among Retired Older Adults in the United States: A Longitudinal Analysis

    Shelia R. Cotten;George Ford;Sherry Ford;Timothy M. Hale

  • Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use

    Reynol Junco;Shelia R. Cotten

  • Internet use and depression among older adults

    Shelia R. Cotten;George Ford;Sherry Ford;Timothy M. Hale

  • Understanding online safety behaviors

    Hsin-yi Sandy Tsai;Mengtian Jiang;Saleem Alhabash;Robert LaRose

  • Social Support and Playing Around: An Examination of How Older Adults Acquire Digital Literacy with Tablet Computers

    Hsin Yi Sandy Tsai;Ruth Shillair;Shelia R. Cotten

  • Getting Grandma Online: Are Tablets the Answer for Increasing Digital Inclusion for Older Adults in the U.S.?

    Hsin yi Sandy Tsai;Ruth Shillair;Shelia R. Cotten;Vicki Winstead

  • Rural-Urban Differences in General and Health-Related Internet Use

    Timothy M. Hale;Shelia R. Cotten;Patricia Drentea;Melinda Goldner

  • The Use of Wearable Activity Trackers Among Older Adults: Focus Group Study of Tracker Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers in the Maintenance Stage of Behavior Change

    Anastasia Kononova;Lin Li;Kendra Kamp;Marie Bowen

  • Marital Status and Mental Health Revisited: Examining the Importance of Risk Factors and Resources

    Shelia R. Cotten

  • Balancing the One-to-One Equation: Equity and Access in Three Laptop Programs.

    Mark Warschauer;Binbin Zheng;Melissa Niiya;Shelia Cotten

  • Students' Technology Use and the Impacts on Well-Being.

    Shelia R. Cotten

  • You Can Teach an Old Dog New Tricks A Qualitative Analysis of How Residents of Senior Living Communities May Use the Web to Overcome Spatial and Social Barriers

    Vicki Winstead;William A. Anderson;Elizabeth A. Yost;Shelia R. Cotten

  • Digital inequalities 2.0: Legacy inequalities in the information age

    Laura Robinson;Jeremy Schulz;Grant Blank;Massimo Ragnedda

  • Online safety begins with you and me

    Ruth Shillair;Shelia R. Cotten;Hsin-Yi Sandy Tsai;Saleem Alhabash

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert LaRose
Robert LaRose Michigan State University
Wei Peng
Wei Peng Michigan State University
Anabel Quan-Haase
Anabel Quan-Haase University of Western Ontario
Barry Wellman
Barry Wellman University of Toronto
Gustavo S. Mesch
Gustavo S. Mesch University of Haifa
William J. Chopik
William J. Chopik Michigan State University
Judith E. Arnetz
Judith E. Arnetz Michigan State University
Mark Warschauer
Mark Warschauer University of California, Irvine
George Farkas
George Farkas University of California, Irvine
Lisa M. Sullivan
Lisa M. Sullivan Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to rewarding and flexible career paths. Many prospective students look for the cheapest msw programs to earn a Master of Social Work and launch careers in counseling or community services. Budget-friendly options make it easier to advance your education without heavy financial burdens.

For those interested in behavioral analysis, accredited bcba masters programs online can help you become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst. This credential is in high demand in clinics, schools, and private practice.

Students seeking to fast-track their careers can consider accelerated programs. There are rigorous 1 year msw programs online for those who want to begin working quicker in social work.

Psychology remains a versatile option, and the fastest online psychology degree programs allow you to complete your studies in less time, preparing you for diverse roles in research, counseling, or human resources.

Best Scientists Citing Shelia R. Cotten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles