World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Haglund

Peter Haglund

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
58
Citations
13089
World Ranking
3243
National Ranking
59

Chemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
13442
World Ranking
9658
National Ranking
136

Peter Haglund publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Haglund sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 205 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter Haglund D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Haglund sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Haglund is a researcher affiliated with Umeå University in Sweden, specializing in environmental science with a focus on toxicology, pollution, and analytical chemistry. They have contributed extensively to the study of chemical pollutants and their environmental impact, employing advanced mass spectrometry techniques to identify and assess emerging contaminants.

Their recent research papers span several topics in environmental monitoring, pollution, and contaminant characterization. Notable publications include:

  • "NORMAN guidance on suspect and non-target screening in environmental monitoring" (2023) published in Environmental Sciences Europe
  • "The NORMAN Suspect List Exchange (NORMAN-SLE): facilitating European and worldwide collaboration on suspect screening in high resolution mass spectrometry" (2022) published in Environmental Sciences Europe
  • "Bacterial communities as indicators of environmental pollution by POPs in marine sediments" (2020) published in Environmental Pollution
  • "Non-target and suspect characterisation of organic contaminants in Arctic air - Part 2: Application of a new tool for identification and prioritisation of chemicals of emerging Arctic concern in air" (2020) published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Non-targeted screening workflows for gas chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis and identification of biomagnifying contaminants in biota samples" (2020) published in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

Peter Haglund frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Regular coauthors include:

  • Nikiforos Alygizakis
  • Juliane Hollender
  • Emma Schymanski
  • Pablo Gago-Ferrero
  • Paweł Rostkowski

The main publication venues for their work feature journals related to environmental science and pollution, notably:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Sciences Europe
  • Research Square
  • Environmental Pollution
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Their scholarly output is predominantly concentrated in the domain of environmental science, with specific subfields including:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Pollution
  • Ecology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Spectroscopy

Key topics explored in their research include:

  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies

Best Publications

  • EU-wide monitoring survey on emerging polar organic contaminants in wastewater treatment plant effluents.

    Robert Loos;Raquel Carvalho;Diana C. António;Sara Comero

  • Non-target screening with high-resolution mass spectrometry: critical review using a collaborative trial on water analysis

    Emma L. Schymanski;Heinz P. Singer;Jaroslav Slobodnik;Ildiko M. Ipolyi

  • Screening of organophosphorus compounds and their distribution in various indoor environments

    Anneli Marklund;Barbro Andersson;Peter Haglund

  • Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in marine and fresh water biota and in human milk

    Anneli Marklund Sundkvist;Ulrika Olofsson;Peter Haglund

  • Sources, Fate, and Toxic Hazards of Oxygenated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) at PAH- contaminated Sites

    Staffan Lundstedt;Paul A. White;Christine L. Lemieux;Krista D. Lynes

  • Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in Swedish sewage treatment plants.

    Anneli Marklund;Barbro Andersson;Peter Haglund

  • Identification and Quantification of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers and Methoxy-Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers in Baltic Biota

    Peter S. Haglund;Douglas R. Zook;Hans-Rudolf Buser;Jiwei Hu

  • Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in air from various indoor environments

    Anneli Marklund;Barbro Andersson;Peter Haglund

  • Traffic as a source of organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in snow.

    Anneli Marklund;Barbro Andersson;Peter Haglund

  • Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in contaminated soils by Fenton's reagent : A multivariate evaluation of the importance of soil characteristics and PAH properties

    Sofia Jonsson;Ylva Persson;Sofia Frankki;Bert van Bavel

  • A Robust Thermal Modulator for Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography

    John B. Phillips;Richard B. Gaines;Jan Blomberg;Frans W.M. Van Der Wielen

  • Contribution of precursor compounds to the release of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) from waste water treatment plants (WWTPs)

    Ulrika Eriksson;Peter Haglund;Anna Kärrman

  • Degradation and formation of polycyclic aromatic compounds during bioslurry treatment of an aged gasworks soil.

    Staffan Lundstedt;Peter Haglund;Lars Öberg

  • Projected future climate change and Baltic Sea ecosystem management.

    Agneta Andersson;H. E. Markus Meier;Matyas Ripszam;Owen Rowe

  • Characterisation and determination of profiles of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a traffic tunnel in Gothenburg, Sweden

    Håkan Wingfors;Åke Sjödin;Peter Haglund;Eva Brorström-Lundén

  • Comments Concerning the National Swedish Contaminant Monitoring Programme in Marine Biota, 2008

    Anders Bignert;Sara Danielsson;Alma Strandmark;Elisabeth Nyberg

  • Maternal transfer of brominated flame retardants in zebrafish (Danio rerio).

    Jenny Rattfelt Nyholm;Anna Norman;Leif Norrgren;Peter Haglund

  • The NORMAN Suspect List Exchange (NORMAN-SLE): facilitating European and worldwide collaboration on suspect screening in high resolution mass spectrometry

    Unknown

  • Non-target screening and prioritization of potentially persistent, bioaccumulating and toxic domestic wastewater contaminants and their removal in on-site and large-scale sewage treatment plants.

    Kristin M. Blum;Patrik L. Andersson;Gunno Renman;Lutz Ahrens

  • Polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated naphthalenes in Swedish sediment and biota: levels, patterns, and time trends

    Ulf Jaernberg;Lillemor Asplund;Cynthia de Wit;Anna Karin Grafstroem

  • Trace analysis of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans and WHO polychlorinated biphenyls in food using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with electron-capture detection

    Conny Danielsson;Karin Wiberg;Peter Korytár;Sture Bergek

Frequent Co-Authors

Karin Wiberg
Karin Wiberg Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Mats Tysklind
Mats Tysklind Umeå University
Anders Bignert
Anders Bignert Swedish Museum of Natural History
Lillemor Asplund
Lillemor Asplund Stockholm University
Agneta Andersson
Agneta Andersson Umeå University
Urs Berger
Urs Berger Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Christoffer Rappe
Christoffer Rappe Umeå University
Terry F. Bidleman
Terry F. Bidleman Umeå University
Cynthia A. de Wit
Cynthia A. de Wit Stockholm University
Gerard Cornelissen
Gerard Cornelissen Norwegian University of Life Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their educational journey beyond Environmental Sciences, there are a variety of online degree options available that can complement or diversify career goals. For example, advanced education opportunities such as an edd without dissertation provide a flexible path for educators seeking leadership roles without the traditional dissertation hurdle.

Similarly, many professionals look into the best online eds to edd programs for a seamless transition from master's to doctoral degrees, enhancing their expertise and credentials in education.

For those considering social impact careers, affordable options like dsw programs online offer specialized training in social work, a profession that increasingly intersects with environmental justice and community health.

Additionally, broadening one’s academic foundation through best affordable online general studies degree programs can provide versatile skills useful in various environmental science roles, from policy to research.

These varied degree pathways highlight the adaptability and interdisciplinary nature of environmental science careers in today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Haglund

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles