World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Haglund

Peter Haglund

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 60 9658 8737 136 125 196 13442
Environmental Sciences 58 3246 3105 58 57 205 13089

Peter Haglund publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Haglund between 1987 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Haglund published across 38 years, from 1987 to 2024, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2005. 9 of the 232 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2005. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications
1987 2024

232 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Haglund: publications per year, 1987 to 2024
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 3
1991 0
1992 1
1993 2
1994 3
1995 2
1996 4
1997 4
1998 4
1999 3
2000 6
2001 3
2002 7
2003 17
2004 5
2005 18
2006 11
2007 13
2008 7
2009 6
2010 14
2011 2
2012 12
2013 11
2014 7
2015 11
2016 3
2017 9
2018 6
2019 9
2020 6
2021 3
2022 9
2023 5
2024 4
Total 232
Download as CSV

Peter Haglund publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Haglund sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 205 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318 205
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Haglund D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Haglund sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166 58
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Haglund is a researcher affiliated with Umeå University in Sweden, specializing in environmental science with a focus on toxicology, pollution, and analytical chemistry. They have contributed extensively to the study of chemical pollutants and their environmental impact, employing advanced mass spectrometry techniques to identify and assess emerging contaminants.

Their recent research papers span several topics in environmental monitoring, pollution, and contaminant characterization. Notable publications include:

  • "NORMAN guidance on suspect and non-target screening in environmental monitoring" (2023) published in Environmental Sciences Europe
  • "The NORMAN Suspect List Exchange (NORMAN-SLE): facilitating European and worldwide collaboration on suspect screening in high resolution mass spectrometry" (2022) published in Environmental Sciences Europe
  • "Bacterial communities as indicators of environmental pollution by POPs in marine sediments" (2020) published in Environmental Pollution
  • "Non-target and suspect characterisation of organic contaminants in Arctic air - Part 2: Application of a new tool for identification and prioritisation of chemicals of emerging Arctic concern in air" (2020) published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Non-targeted screening workflows for gas chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis and identification of biomagnifying contaminants in biota samples" (2020) published in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

Peter Haglund frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Regular coauthors include:

  • Nikiforos Alygizakis
  • Juliane Hollender
  • Emma Schymanski
  • Pablo Gago-Ferrero
  • Paweł Rostkowski

The main publication venues for their work feature journals related to environmental science and pollution, notably:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Sciences Europe
  • Research Square
  • Environmental Pollution
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Their scholarly output is predominantly concentrated in the domain of environmental science, with specific subfields including:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Pollution
  • Ecology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Spectroscopy

Key topics explored in their research include:

  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies

Best Publications

  • EU-wide monitoring survey on emerging polar organic contaminants in wastewater treatment plant effluents.

    Robert Loos;Raquel Carvalho;Diana C. António;Sara Comero

  • Non-target screening with high-resolution mass spectrometry: critical review using a collaborative trial on water analysis

    Emma L. Schymanski;Heinz P. Singer;Jaroslav Slobodnik;Ildiko M. Ipolyi

  • Screening of organophosphorus compounds and their distribution in various indoor environments

    Anneli Marklund;Barbro Andersson;Peter Haglund

  • Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in marine and fresh water biota and in human milk

    Anneli Marklund Sundkvist;Ulrika Olofsson;Peter Haglund

  • Sources, Fate, and Toxic Hazards of Oxygenated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) at PAH- contaminated Sites

    Staffan Lundstedt;Paul A. White;Christine L. Lemieux;Krista D. Lynes

  • Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in Swedish sewage treatment plants.

    Anneli Marklund;Barbro Andersson;Peter Haglund

  • Identification and Quantification of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers and Methoxy-Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers in Baltic Biota

    Peter S. Haglund;Douglas R. Zook;Hans-Rudolf Buser;Jiwei Hu

  • Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in air from various indoor environments

    Anneli Marklund;Barbro Andersson;Peter Haglund

  • Traffic as a source of organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in snow.

    Anneli Marklund;Barbro Andersson;Peter Haglund

  • Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in contaminated soils by Fenton's reagent : A multivariate evaluation of the importance of soil characteristics and PAH properties

    Sofia Jonsson;Ylva Persson;Sofia Frankki;Bert van Bavel

  • A Robust Thermal Modulator for Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography

    John B. Phillips;Richard B. Gaines;Jan Blomberg;Frans W.M. Van Der Wielen

  • Contribution of precursor compounds to the release of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) from waste water treatment plants (WWTPs)

    Ulrika Eriksson;Peter Haglund;Anna Kärrman

  • Degradation and formation of polycyclic aromatic compounds during bioslurry treatment of an aged gasworks soil.

    Staffan Lundstedt;Peter Haglund;Lars Öberg

  • Projected future climate change and Baltic Sea ecosystem management.

    Agneta Andersson;H. E. Markus Meier;Matyas Ripszam;Owen Rowe

  • Characterisation and determination of profiles of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a traffic tunnel in Gothenburg, Sweden

    Håkan Wingfors;Åke Sjödin;Peter Haglund;Eva Brorström-Lundén

  • Comments Concerning the National Swedish Contaminant Monitoring Programme in Marine Biota, 2008

    Anders Bignert;Sara Danielsson;Alma Strandmark;Elisabeth Nyberg

  • Maternal transfer of brominated flame retardants in zebrafish (Danio rerio).

    Jenny Rattfelt Nyholm;Anna Norman;Leif Norrgren;Peter Haglund

  • Non-target screening and prioritization of potentially persistent, bioaccumulating and toxic domestic wastewater contaminants and their removal in on-site and large-scale sewage treatment plants.

    Kristin M. Blum;Patrik L. Andersson;Gunno Renman;Lutz Ahrens

  • Polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated naphthalenes in Swedish sediment and biota: levels, patterns, and time trends

    Ulf Jaernberg;Lillemor Asplund;Cynthia de Wit;Anna Karin Grafstroem

  • Trace analysis of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans and WHO polychlorinated biphenyls in food using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with electron-capture detection

    Conny Danielsson;Karin Wiberg;Peter Korytár;Sture Bergek

Frequent Co-Authors

Karin Wiberg
Karin Wiberg Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Mats Tysklind
Mats Tysklind Umeå University
Anders Bignert
Anders Bignert Swedish Museum of Natural History
Lillemor Asplund
Lillemor Asplund Stockholm University
Agneta Andersson
Agneta Andersson Umeå University
Urs Berger
Urs Berger Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Christoffer Rappe
Christoffer Rappe Umeå University
Terry F. Bidleman
Terry F. Bidleman Umeå University
Cynthia A. de Wit
Cynthia A. de Wit Stockholm University
Gerard Cornelissen
Gerard Cornelissen Norwegian University of Life Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their educational journey beyond Environmental Sciences, there are a variety of online degree options available that can complement or diversify career goals. For example, advanced education opportunities such as an edd without dissertation provide a flexible path for educators seeking leadership roles without the traditional dissertation hurdle.

Similarly, many professionals look into the best online eds to edd programs for a seamless transition from master's to doctoral degrees, enhancing their expertise and credentials in education.

For those considering social impact careers, affordable options like dsw programs online offer specialized training in social work, a profession that increasingly intersects with environmental justice and community health.

Additionally, broadening one’s academic foundation through best affordable online general studies degree programs can provide versatile skills useful in various environmental science roles, from policy to research.

These varied degree pathways highlight the adaptability and interdisciplinary nature of environmental science careers in today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Haglund

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles